Differentiating solitary brain metastases from high-grade gliomas with MR: comparing qualitative versus quantitative diagnostic strategies

被引:9
|
作者
Voicu, Ioan Paul [1 ]
Pravata, Emanuele [2 ]
Panara, Valentina [3 ,4 ]
Navarra, Riccardo [3 ]
Mattei, Peter A. [3 ]
Caulo, Massimo [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] G Mazzini Hosp, Dept Imaging, I-64100 Teramo, Italy
[2] Osped Reg Lugano, Neuroradiol Dept, Neuroctr Southern Switzerland, Via Tesserete 46, CH-6901 Lugano, Switzerland
[3] Univ G DAnnunzio, ITAB Inst Adv Biomed Technol, Dept Neurosci & Imaging, Chieti, Italy
[4] Univ G dAnnunzio Chieti, Dept Radiol, Chieti, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2022年 / 127卷 / 08期
关键词
Brain neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Glioma; Neoplasm metastasis; Perfusion; Area under curve; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; GLIOBLASTOMA-MULTIFORME; PERITUMORAL EDEMA; SIGNAL INTENSITY; PERFUSION; SINGLE; RECOMMENDATIONS; PERMEABILITY; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-022-01516-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of MRI diagnostic algorithms with an ascending automatization, in distinguishing between high-grade glioma (HGG) and solitary brain metastases (SBM). Methods 36 patients with histologically proven HGG (n = 18) or SBM (n = 18), matched by size and location were enrolled from a database containing 655 patients. Four different diagnostic algorithms were performed serially to mimic the clinical setting where a radiologist would typically seek out further findings to reach a decision: pure qualitative, analytic qualitative (based on standardized evaluation of tumor features), semi-quantitative (based on perfusion and diffusion cutoffs included in the literature) and a quantitative data-driven algorithm of the perfusion and diffusion parameters. The diagnostic yields of the four algorithms were tested with ROC analysis and Kendall coefficient of concordance. Results Qualitative algorithm yielded sensitivity of 72.2%, specificity of 78.8%, and AUC of 0.75. Analytic qualitative algorithm distinguished HGG from SBM with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 77.7%, and an AUC of 0.889. The semi-quantitative algorithm yielded sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 83.3%, and AUC = 0.889. The data-driven algorithm yielded sensitivity = 94.4%, specificity = 100%, and AUC = 0.948. The concordance analysis between the four algorithms and the histologic findings showed moderate concordance for the first algorithm, (k = 0.501, P < 0.01), good concordance for the second (k = 0.798, P < 0.01), and third (k = 0.783, P < 0.01), and excellent concordance for fourth (k = 0.901, p < 0.0001). Conclusion When differentiating HGG from SBM, an analytical qualitative algorithm outperformed qualitative algorithm, and obtained similar results compared to the semi-quantitative approach. However, the use of data-driven quantitative algorithm yielded an excellent differentiation.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 898
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Differentiating solitary brain metastases from high-grade gliomas with MR: comparing qualitative versus quantitative diagnostic strategies
    Ioan Paul Voicu
    Emanuele Pravatà
    Valentina Panara
    Riccardo Navarra
    Peter A. Mattei
    Massimo Caulo
    La radiologia medica, 2022, 127 : 891 - 898
  • [2] Proton MR spectroscopy in the differentiation of high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases
    Fan, G
    Wu, Z
    Guo, Q
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 666 - 666
  • [3] Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating between high-grade gliomas and brain metastases
    Caravan, Ionut
    Ciortea, Cristiana Augusta
    Contis, Alexandra
    Lebovici, Andrei
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (05) : 599 - 605
  • [4] Diagnostic role of apparent diffusion coefficient combined with intratumoral susceptibility signals in differentiating high-grade gliomas from brain metastases
    Bozdag, Mustafa
    Er, Ali
    Cinkooglu, Akin
    Ekmekci, Sumeyye
    NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 34 (03): : 169 - 179
  • [5] Differentiation between high-grade gliomas and solitary brain metastases based on multidiffusion MRI model quantitative analysis
    He, Libing
    Chen, Meining
    Li, Hongjian
    Shi, Xiran
    Qiu, Zhiqiang
    Xu, Xiaoxue
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [6] High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases: Differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR Imaging
    Law, M
    Cha, S
    Knopp, EA
    Johnson, G
    Arnett, J
    Litt, AW
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (03) : 715 - 721
  • [7] THE MR CHARACTERISTICS OF LOW VERSUS HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS
    FOBBEN, ES
    HACKNEY, DB
    ZIMMERMAN, RA
    GOLDBERG, HI
    GROSSMAN, RI
    BILANIUK, LT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 1988, 9 (05) : 1039 - 1039
  • [8] Differentiating High-Grade Gliomas from Brain Metastases at Magnetic Resonance: The Role of Texture Analysis of the Peritumoral Zone
    Csutak, Csaba
    Stefan, Paul-Andrei
    Lenghel, Lavinia Manuela
    Morosanu, Cezar Octavian
    Lupean, Roxana-Adelina
    Simonca, Larisa
    Mihu, Carmen Mihaela
    Lebovici, Andrei
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (09) : 1 - 17
  • [9] In vivo single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy in the differentiation of high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases
    Fan, G
    Sun, B
    Wu, Z
    Guo, Q
    Guo,Y
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 59 (01) : 77 - 85
  • [10] Bi-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating high-grade gliomas from solitary brain metastases: a VOI-based histogram analysis
    Su, Yifei
    Wang, Junhao
    Guo, Jinxia
    Liu, Xuanchen
    Yang, Xiaoxiong
    Cheng, Rui
    Wang, Chunhong
    Xu, Cheng
    He, Yexin
    Ji, Hongming
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):