Differentiating solitary brain metastases from high-grade gliomas with MR: comparing qualitative versus quantitative diagnostic strategies

被引:9
|
作者
Voicu, Ioan Paul [1 ]
Pravata, Emanuele [2 ]
Panara, Valentina [3 ,4 ]
Navarra, Riccardo [3 ]
Mattei, Peter A. [3 ]
Caulo, Massimo [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] G Mazzini Hosp, Dept Imaging, I-64100 Teramo, Italy
[2] Osped Reg Lugano, Neuroradiol Dept, Neuroctr Southern Switzerland, Via Tesserete 46, CH-6901 Lugano, Switzerland
[3] Univ G DAnnunzio, ITAB Inst Adv Biomed Technol, Dept Neurosci & Imaging, Chieti, Italy
[4] Univ G dAnnunzio Chieti, Dept Radiol, Chieti, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2022年 / 127卷 / 08期
关键词
Brain neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Glioma; Neoplasm metastasis; Perfusion; Area under curve; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; GLIOBLASTOMA-MULTIFORME; PERITUMORAL EDEMA; SIGNAL INTENSITY; PERFUSION; SINGLE; RECOMMENDATIONS; PERMEABILITY; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-022-01516-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of MRI diagnostic algorithms with an ascending automatization, in distinguishing between high-grade glioma (HGG) and solitary brain metastases (SBM). Methods 36 patients with histologically proven HGG (n = 18) or SBM (n = 18), matched by size and location were enrolled from a database containing 655 patients. Four different diagnostic algorithms were performed serially to mimic the clinical setting where a radiologist would typically seek out further findings to reach a decision: pure qualitative, analytic qualitative (based on standardized evaluation of tumor features), semi-quantitative (based on perfusion and diffusion cutoffs included in the literature) and a quantitative data-driven algorithm of the perfusion and diffusion parameters. The diagnostic yields of the four algorithms were tested with ROC analysis and Kendall coefficient of concordance. Results Qualitative algorithm yielded sensitivity of 72.2%, specificity of 78.8%, and AUC of 0.75. Analytic qualitative algorithm distinguished HGG from SBM with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 77.7%, and an AUC of 0.889. The semi-quantitative algorithm yielded sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 83.3%, and AUC = 0.889. The data-driven algorithm yielded sensitivity = 94.4%, specificity = 100%, and AUC = 0.948. The concordance analysis between the four algorithms and the histologic findings showed moderate concordance for the first algorithm, (k = 0.501, P < 0.01), good concordance for the second (k = 0.798, P < 0.01), and third (k = 0.783, P < 0.01), and excellent concordance for fourth (k = 0.901, p < 0.0001). Conclusion When differentiating HGG from SBM, an analytical qualitative algorithm outperformed qualitative algorithm, and obtained similar results compared to the semi-quantitative approach. However, the use of data-driven quantitative algorithm yielded an excellent differentiation.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 898
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate high-grade gliomas and brain metastases
    Mouthuy, Nathalie
    Cosnard, Guy
    Abarca-Quinones, Jorge
    Michoux, Nicolas
    JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2012, 39 (05) : 301 - 307
  • [22] Usefulness of quantitative peritumoural perfusion and proton spectroscopic magnetic resonance imaging evaluation in differentiating brain gliomas from solitary brain metastases
    Sparacia, Gianvincenzo
    Gadde, Judith A.
    Iaia, Alberto
    Sparacia, Benedetta
    Midiri, Massimo
    NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 29 (03): : 160 - 167
  • [23] Solitary metastases and high-grade gliomas: radiological differentiation by morphometric analysis and perfusion-weighted MRI
    Hakyemez, B.
    Erdogan, C.
    Gokalp, G.
    Dusak, A.
    Parlak, M.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 65 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [24] Role of magnetic resonance spectroscopy to differentiate high-grade gliomas from metastases
    Wang, Qun
    Zhang, JiaShu
    Xu, WeiLin
    Chen, XiaoLei
    Zhang, JianMin
    Xu, BaiNan
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2017, 39 (06)
  • [25] A glutamatergic biomarker panel enables differentiating Grade 4 gliomas/astrocytomas from brain metastases
    Lange, Falko
    Gade, Richard
    Einsle, Anne
    Porath, Katrin
    Reichart, Gesine
    Maletzki, Claudia
    Schneider, Bjoern
    Henker, Christian
    Dubinski, Daniel
    Linnebacher, Michael
    Koehling, Ruediger
    Freiman, Thomas M.
    Kirschstein, Timo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [26] Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation
    Abrigo, Jill M.
    Fountain, Daniel M.
    Provenzale, James M.
    Law, Eric K.
    Kwong, Joey S. W.
    Hart, Michael G.
    Tam, Wilson Wai San
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (01):
  • [27] Assessment of diffusion tensor imaging metrics in differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas
    El-Serougy, Lamiaa
    Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel
    Ezzat, Amani
    Eldawoody, Hany
    El-Morsy, Ahmad
    NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 29 (05): : 400 - 407
  • [28] Radiomic features on multiparametric MRI for differentiating pseudoprogression from recurrence in high-grade gliomas
    Lin, Jie
    Su, Chun-Qiu
    Tang, Wen-Tian
    Xia, Zhi-Wei
    Lu, Shan-Shan
    Hong, Xun-Ning
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2024, 65 (11) : 1390 - 1400
  • [29] Role of MRSI Major Metabolite Ratios in Differentiating Between Intracerebral Ring-Enhancing Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Lesions, High-Grade Gliomas and Metastases, and High-Grade and Low-Grade Gliomas
    Ankush, Ankush
    Sardessai, Sanjay
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [30] Solitary Cerebral Metastases vs. High-grade Gliomas: Usefulness of Two MRI Signs in the Differential Diagnosis
    Muccio, Carmine Franco
    Tedeschi, Enrico
    Ugga, Lorenzo
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Esposito, Gennaro
    Caranci, Ferdinando
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (09) : 4905 - 4909