Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating between high-grade gliomas and brain metastases

被引:55
|
作者
Caravan, Ionut [1 ]
Ciortea, Cristiana Augusta [2 ]
Contis, Alexandra [1 ]
Lebovici, Andrei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Iuliu Hatieganu Univ Med & Pharm, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[2] Emergency Cty Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cluj Napoca, Romania
关键词
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); high-grade glioma; brain metastasis; peritumoral edema; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-SPECTROSCOPY; GLIOBLASTOMA-MULTIFORME; PERFUSION METRICS; TUMOR; DISTINCTION; REGIONS; MRI;
D O I
10.1177/0284185117727787
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) and brain metastases (BMs) can display similar imaging characteristics on conventional MRI. In HGGs, the peritumoral edema may be infiltrated by the malignant cells, which was not observed in BMs. Purpose: To determine whether the apparent diffusion coefficient values could differentiate HGGs from BMs. Material and Methods: Fifty-seven patients underwent conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) before treatment. The minimum and mean ADC in the enhancing tumor (ADC(min), ADC(mean)) and the minimum ADC in the peritumoral region (ADC(edema)) were measured from ADC maps. To determine whether there was a statistical difference between groups, ADC values were compared. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the cutoff ADC value for distinguishing between HGGs and BMs. Results: The mean ADC(min) values in the intratumoral regions of HGGs were significantly higher than those in BMs. No differences were observed between groups regarding ADC(mean) values. The mean ADC(min) values in the peritumoral edema of HGGs were significantly lower than those in BMs. According to ROC curve analysis, a cutoff value of 1.332x10(-3) mm(2)/s for the ADC(edema) generated the best combination of sensitivity (95%) and specificity (84%) for distinguishing between HGGs and BMs. The same value showed a sensitivity of 95.6% and a specificity of 100% for distinguishing between GBMs and BMs. Conclusion: ADC values from DWI were found to distinguish between HGGs and solitary BMs. The peritumoral ADC values are better than the intratumoral ADC values in predicting the tumor type.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:599 / 605
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic role of apparent diffusion coefficient combined with intratumoral susceptibility signals in differentiating high-grade gliomas from brain metastases
    Bozdag, Mustafa
    Er, Ali
    Cinkooglu, Akin
    Ekmekci, Sumeyye
    NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 34 (03): : 169 - 179
  • [2] The Value of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Differentiating High-Grade Gliomas from Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jiang, Rui
    Du, Fei-Zhou
    He, Ci
    Gu, Ming
    Ke, Zhen-Wu
    Li, Jian-Hao
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):
  • [3] Differentiating solitary brain metastases from high-grade gliomas with MR: comparing qualitative versus quantitative diagnostic strategies
    Voicu, Ioan Paul
    Pravata, Emanuele
    Panara, Valentina
    Navarra, Riccardo
    Mattei, Peter A.
    Caulo, Massimo
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2022, 127 (08): : 891 - 898
  • [4] Differentiating solitary brain metastases from high-grade gliomas with MR: comparing qualitative versus quantitative diagnostic strategies
    Ioan Paul Voicu
    Emanuele Pravatà
    Valentina Panara
    Riccardo Navarra
    Peter A. Mattei
    Massimo Caulo
    La radiologia medica, 2022, 127 : 891 - 898
  • [5] Apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of high-grade cerebral gliomas
    Castillo, M
    Smith, JK
    Kwock, L
    Wilber, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2001, 22 (01) : 60 - 64
  • [6] Diffusion weighted imaging in high-grade gliomas: A histogram-based analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient profile
    Gihr, Georg
    Horvath-Rizea, Diana
    Hekeler, Elena
    Ganslandt, Oliver
    Henkes, Hans
    Hoffmann, Karl-Titus
    Scherlach, Cordula
    Schob, Stefan
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):
  • [7] Apparent diffusion coefficient; is it an effective index for differentiating between types of lung cancer brain metastases?
    Aybar, Mustafa
    Turna, Onder
    WEST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (02) : 84 - 90
  • [8] Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients and MR Spectroscopy Findings in High-Grade Gliomas
    Gadda, Davide
    Mazzoni, Lorenzo Nicola
    Pasquini, Luca
    Busoni, Simone
    Simonelli, Paolo
    Giordano, Gian Paolo
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2017, 27 (01) : 128 - 134
  • [9] Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients and Distributed Diffusion Coefficients in High-Grade Gliomas
    Kwee, Thomas C.
    Galban, Craig J.
    Tsien, Christina
    Junck, Larry
    Sundgren, Pia C.
    Ivancevic, Marko K.
    Johnson, Timothy D.
    Meyer, Charles R.
    Reherntulla, Alnawaz
    Ross, Brian D.
    Chenevert, Thomas L.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 31 (03) : 531 - 537
  • [10] Magnetic resonance imaging of pilocytic astrocytomas: Usefulness of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value for differentiation from high-grade gliomas
    Murakami, R.
    Hirai, T.
    Kitajima, M.
    Fukuoka, H.
    Toya, R.
    Nakamura, H.
    Kuratsu, J.
    Yamashita, Y.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2008, 49 (04) : 462 - 467