Three-dimensional versus four-dimensional dose calculation for breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy

被引:4
|
作者
Chung, Joo-Hyun [1 ]
Chun, Minsoo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Jung-In [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Park, Jong Min [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Shin, Kyung Hwan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Biomed Res Inst, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Inst Radiat Med, Med Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Adv Inst Convergence Technol, Robot Res Lab Extreme Environm, Suwon, South Korea
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2020年 / 93卷 / 1110期
关键词
MONTE-CARLO; DOSIMETRIC IMPACT; BREATHING MOTION; HOLD TECHNIQUES; HEART-DISEASE; RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER; RESPIRATION; IRRADIATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20200047
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the effect of intra- and interfractional motion during breast intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) by calculating dose distribution based on four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). Methods: 20 patients diagnosed with left breast cancer were enrolled. Three-dimensional CT (3DCT) along with 10 phases of 4DCT were collected for each patient, with target volumes independently delineated on both 3DCT and all phases of 4DCT. IMRT plans were generated based on 3DCT (43.2Gy in 16 fractions). The plan parameters for each segment were split into phases based on time duration estimates for each respiratory phase, with phase-specific dose distributions calculated and summated (4D-calculated dose). The procedure is repeated for 16 fractionations by randomly allocating starting phase using random-number generation to simulate interfractional discrepancy caused by different starting phase. Comparisons of plan quality between the original and 4D-calculated doses were analyzed. Results: There was a significant distortion in 4D-calculated dose induced by respiratory motion in terms of conformity and homogeneity index compared to those of the original 3D plan. Mean doses of the heart and the ipsilateral lung were significantly higher in the 4D-calculated doses compared to those of the original 3D plan (0.34 Gy, p = 0.010 and 0.59Gy, p < 0.001), respectively). The mean internal mammary lymph node (IMN) dose was significantly greater in the 4D-calculated plan, compared to the original 3D plan (1.42Gy, p < 0.001). Conclusions: IMN doses should be optimized during the dose-calculation for the free-breathing left breast IMRT. Advances in knowledge: The interplay effect between respiratory motion and multileaf collimator modulation caused discrepancies in dose distribution, particularly in IMN.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dosimetric comparison of three dimensional conformal radiation therapy versus intensity modulated radiation therapy in accelerated partial breast irradiation
    Moorthy, S.
    Elhateer, H. S.
    Majumdar, S. K. D.
    Mohammed, S.
    Patnaik, R.
    Narayanamurty
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 53 (01) : 147 - 151
  • [42] Geometric and Dosimetric Verification of Four-dimensional Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy
    Niu, Y.
    Han-Oh, S.
    Parke, W. C.
    Yi, B.
    Yu, C. X.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S894 - S894
  • [43] THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIATION THERAPY AND INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY COMBINED WITH TRANSCATHETER ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: AN IRRADIATION DOSE ESCALATION STUDY
    Ren, Zhi-Gang
    Zhao, Jian-Dong
    Gu, Ke
    Chen, Zhen
    Lin, Jun-Hua
    Xu, Zhi-Yong
    Hu, Wei-Gang
    Zhou, Zhen-Hua
    Liu, Lu-Ming
    Jiang, Guo-Liang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (02): : 496 - 502
  • [44] Use of benchmark dose-volume histograms for selection of the optimal technique between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in prostate cancer
    Luo, Chunhui
    Yang, Claus Chunli
    Narayan, Samir
    Stern, Robin L.
    Perks, Julian
    Goldberg, Zelanna
    Ryu, Janice
    Purdy, James A.
    Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (04): : 1253 - 1262
  • [45] Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Treatment Outcomes and Late Toxicities
    Chen, J.
    Huang, Y.
    Kuo, S.
    Hong, R.
    Ko, J.
    Wang, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (02): : 477 - 477
  • [46] Intensity modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for the treatment of high grade glioma: a dosimetric comparison
    MacDonald, Shannon M.
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    Kachris, Stefanos
    Vogds, Betty J.
    DeRouen, Melissa
    Gitttleman, Alicia E.
    DeWyngaert, Keith
    Vlachaki, Maria T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 8 (02): : 47 - 60
  • [47] Conformal radiation therapy: conventional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of cancer of maxillary sinus
    Santoro, M.
    Scalzo, G.
    Pingitore, D.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2007, 183 : 107 - 108
  • [48] The Effectiveness of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy versus Three-Dimensional Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of the Literatures
    Yu, Ting
    Zhang, Qiongwen
    Zheng, Tianying
    Shi, Huashan
    Liu, Yang
    Feng, Shijian
    Hao, Meiqin
    Ye, Lei
    Wu, Xueqian
    Yang, Cheng
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (05):
  • [49] Integral Dose Variation in Three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy, Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy, and Helical Tomotherapy
    Yang, R.
    Xu, S.
    Jiang, W.
    Zhou, G.
    Wang, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S713 - S713
  • [50] Four Dimensional Inverse Planning for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Ma, Y.
    Lee, K.
    Xing, L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)