Electronic patient-reported outcome measures using mobile health technology in rheumatology: A scoping review

被引:9
|
作者
Shelton, Jaclyn [1 ]
Casey, Sierra [1 ]
Puhl, Nathan [1 ]
Buckingham, Jeanette [1 ]
Yacyshyn, Elaine [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 07期
关键词
TREAT-TO-TARGET; UNITED-STATES; ARTHRITIS; RECOMMENDATIONS; PREVALENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0253615
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective This scoping review aims to characterize the current literature on electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in rheumatology and assess the feasibility and utility of ePROMs and mobile health technology in the management of rheumatic disease. Introduction Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used in rheumatology as they are important markers of disease activity and overall function, encourage shared decision-making, and are associated with high rates of patient satisfaction. With the widespread use of mobile devices, there is increasing interest in the use of mobile health technology to collect electronic PROMs (ePROM). Inclusion criteria All primary studies that involve the collection of ePROMs using mobile devices by individuals with a rheumatic disease were included. Articles were excluded if ePROMs were measured during clinic appointments. Methods A scoping review was performed using Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL with index terms and key words related to "patient-reported outcome measures", "rheumatic diseases", and "mobile health technology". Results A total of 462 records were identified after duplicates were removed. Of the 70 studies selected for review, 43% were conference proceedings and 57% were journal articles, with the majority published in 2016 or later. Inflammatory arthritis was the most common rheumatic disease studied. Generic ePROMs were used over three times more often than disease-specific ePROMs. A total of 39 (56%) studies directly evaluated the feasibility of ePROMs in clinical practice, 19 (27%) were clinical trials that used ePROMs as study endpoints, 9 (13%) were focus groups or surveys on smartphone application development, and 3 (4%) did not fit into one defined category. Conclusion The use of ePROMs in rheumatology is a growing area of research and shows significant utility in clinical practice, particularly in inflammatory arthritis. Further research is needed to better characterize the feasibility of ePROMs in rheumatology and their impact on patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A review of patient-reported outcome measures used in uveitis
    Senthil, Mallika Prem
    Simon, Sumu
    Constable, Paul A.
    [J]. SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 68 (02) : 225 - 240
  • [42] Individualised patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review
    Gangannagaripalli, Jaheeda
    Porter, Ian
    Bradley, Daniela G.
    Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
    Valderas, Jose M.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (01) : 68 - 69
  • [43] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Dermatology: A Systematic Review
    Pattinson, Rachael L.
    Trialonis-Suthakharan, Nirohshah
    Gupta, Sunnia
    Henry, Alasdair L.
    Lavallee, Jacqueline F.
    Otten, Marina
    Pickles, Timothy
    Courtier, Nick
    Austin, Jennifer
    Janus, Christine
    Augustin, Matthias
    Bundy, Chris
    [J]. ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [44] Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
    Sharma, Garima
    Chiva-Razavi, Sima
    Viriato, Daniel
    Naujoks, Christel
    Patalano, Francesco
    Bentley, Sarah
    Findley, Amy
    Johnson, Chloe
    Arbuckle, Rob
    Wolffsohn, James
    [J]. BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 5 (01):
  • [45] Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review
    Worth, Allison
    Hammersley, Victoria
    Knibb, Rebecca
    Flokstra-de-Blok, Bertine
    DunnGalvin, Audrey
    Walker, Samantha
    Dubois, Anthony E. J.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    [J]. NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 24
  • [46] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Psychosocial Quality of Life in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
    Silver, Jennifer A.
    Schwartz, Russell
    Roy, Catherine F.
    Sadeghi, Nader
    Henry, Melissa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (06)
  • [47] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in High-Risk Medical Device Registries: A Scoping Review
    Merenda, Michelle
    Earnest, Arul
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Tse, Wai Chung
    Elder, Elisabeth
    Hopper, Ingrid
    Ahern, Susannah
    [J]. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL OPEN FORUM, 2024, 6
  • [48] Patient-reported outcome measures for life engagement in mental health: a systematic review
    McIntyre, Roger S.
    Ismail, Zahinoor
    Watling, Christopher P.
    Weiss, Catherine
    Meehan, Stine R.
    Musingarimi, Primrose
    Thase, Michael E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [49] Comparing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pain in Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Scoping Review
    Hoque, Sheymonti S.
    Ahern, Susannah
    O'Connell, Helen E.
    Romero, Lorena
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 25 (06):
  • [50] Evaluation of Domains of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Recovery After Childbirth A Scoping and Systematic Review
    Sultan, Pervez
    Sadana, Nishant
    Sharawi, Nadir
    Blake, Lindsay
    El-Boghdadly, Kariem
    Falvo, Andrea
    Ciechanowicz, Sarah
    Athar, Waseem
    Shah, Raj
    Guo, Nan
    Jensen, Sally
    El-Sayed, Yasser
    Cella, David
    Carvalho, Brendan
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (05)