Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review

被引:18
|
作者
Sharma, Garima [1 ]
Chiva-Razavi, Sima [2 ]
Viriato, Daniel [2 ]
Naujoks, Christel [2 ]
Patalano, Francesco [2 ]
Bentley, Sarah [3 ]
Findley, Amy [3 ]
Johnson, Chloe [3 ]
Arbuckle, Rob [3 ]
Wolffsohn, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Healthcare, Hyderabad, India
[2] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Adelphi Values Patient Ctr Outcomes, Bollington, England
[4] Aston Univ, Optometry, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2020年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; VISION IMPAIRMENT; REFRACTIVE STATUS; RASCH; LENS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Presbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals with phakic presbyopia. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Embase up until October 2017. Specific search terms were used to identify presbyopia studies that included a PROM. All clinical trials with PROM-supported endpoints in presbyopia were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further searches were conducted to retrieve articles documenting the development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMs identified. A total of 703 records were identified; 120 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one clinical trials employed PROMs to support a primary or secondary endpoint. In total, 13 PROMs were identified; a further 23 publications pertaining to the development and validation of these measures were retrieved. Most PROMs were developed prior to release of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009 patient-reported outcome guidance and did not satisfy regulatory standards. The Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) was identified as the most appropriate for assessing near-vision functioning in presbyopia. While the NAVQ was developed in line with the FDA guidance, the items do not reflect changes in technology that have occurred since the questionnaire was developed in 2008 (eg, the increase in smartphone use), and the measure was not validated in a purely phakic presbyopia sample. Further research is ongoing to refine the NAVQ to support trial endpoints related to changes in near-vision functioning associated with phakic presbyopia.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Angioedema: A Literature Review
    Brix, Anna Trier Heiberg
    Boysen, Henrik Balle
    Weller, Karsten
    Caballero, Teresa
    Bygum, Anette
    [J]. ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [2] UNDERSTANDING THE PATIENT EXPERIENCE OF PRESBYOPIA AND IDENTIFICATION OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS: A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Sharma, G.
    Viriato, D.
    Naujoks, C.
    Patalano, F.
    Kilgariff, S.
    Wolffsohn, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S434 - S434
  • [3] Understanding the patient experience of presbyopia and identification of patient-reported outcome assessments: a literature review
    Sharma, Garima
    Viriato, Daniel
    Naujoks, Christel
    Patalano, Francesco
    Kilgariff, Sarah
    Wolffsohn, James S.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 : S182 - S182
  • [4] Patient involvement in the development of Patient-reported Outcome Measures: A literature review
    Wiering, Bianca
    De Boer, Dolf
    Delnoij, Diana
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 : 53 - 54
  • [5] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neurosurgery: A Review of the Current Literature
    Harbaugh, Robert E.
    Papadopoulos, Stephen M.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 83 (04) : 630 - 630
  • [6] The rheumatoid foot: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures
    Steven Walmsley
    Anita E Williams
    Mike Ravey
    Andrea Graham
    [J]. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 3
  • [7] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Review of the Literature
    Taimeh, Dina
    Ni Riordain, Richeal
    Fedele, Stefano
    Leeson, Rachel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL & FACIAL PAIN AND HEADACHE, 2023, 37 (02) : 113 - 129
  • [8] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOR MEDICAL DEVICES IN ASIA: A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Nakahara, N.
    Dunlop, S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S100 - S100
  • [9] Patient-reported outcome measures in burning mouth syndrome - a review of the literature
    Riordain, R. Ni
    McCreary, C.
    [J]. ORAL DISEASES, 2013, 19 (03) : 230 - 235
  • [10] In Reply: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neurosurgery: A Review of the Current Literature
    Hasegawa, Harutomo
    Ghimire, Prajwal
    Ashkan, Keyoumars
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 83 (01) : E56 - E56