Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review

被引:18
|
作者
Sharma, Garima [1 ]
Chiva-Razavi, Sima [2 ]
Viriato, Daniel [2 ]
Naujoks, Christel [2 ]
Patalano, Francesco [2 ]
Bentley, Sarah [3 ]
Findley, Amy [3 ]
Johnson, Chloe [3 ]
Arbuckle, Rob [3 ]
Wolffsohn, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Healthcare, Hyderabad, India
[2] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Adelphi Values Patient Ctr Outcomes, Bollington, England
[4] Aston Univ, Optometry, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2020年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; VISION IMPAIRMENT; REFRACTIVE STATUS; RASCH; LENS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Presbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals with phakic presbyopia. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Embase up until October 2017. Specific search terms were used to identify presbyopia studies that included a PROM. All clinical trials with PROM-supported endpoints in presbyopia were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further searches were conducted to retrieve articles documenting the development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMs identified. A total of 703 records were identified; 120 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one clinical trials employed PROMs to support a primary or secondary endpoint. In total, 13 PROMs were identified; a further 23 publications pertaining to the development and validation of these measures were retrieved. Most PROMs were developed prior to release of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009 patient-reported outcome guidance and did not satisfy regulatory standards. The Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) was identified as the most appropriate for assessing near-vision functioning in presbyopia. While the NAVQ was developed in line with the FDA guidance, the items do not reflect changes in technology that have occurred since the questionnaire was developed in 2008 (eg, the increase in smartphone use), and the measure was not validated in a purely phakic presbyopia sample. Further research is ongoing to refine the NAVQ to support trial endpoints related to changes in near-vision functioning associated with phakic presbyopia.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient engagement in multimorbidity: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures
    Barello, Serena
    Anderson, Gloria
    Bosio, Caterina
    Lane, Deirdre A.
    Leo, Donato G.
    Lobban, Trudie C. A.
    Trevisan, Caterina
    Graffigna, Guendalina
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [42] Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in melanoma clinical quality registries: a systematic review
    Blood, Zachary
    Anh Tran
    Caleo, Lauren
    Saw, Robyn
    Dieng, Mbathio
    Shackleton, Mark
    Soyer, H. Peter
    Arnold, Chris
    Mann, Graham J.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [43] Patient-Reported Outcomes (Pros) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Proms)
    Weldring, Theresa
    Smith, Sheree M. S.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2013, 6 : 61 - 68
  • [44] Patient-reported outcome measures and orthodontics
    Ryan, Fiona S.
    Cunningham, Susan J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 45 (02) : 63 - 64
  • [45] Collecting patient-reported outcome measures
    Ahern, Susannah
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Ackerman, Ilana N.
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2017, 47 (12) : 1454 - 1457
  • [46] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOR NOCTURIA
    Bower, W.
    Rose, G.
    Denys, M.
    Kumps, C.
    Whishaw, M.
    Khan, F.
    Everaert, K.
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2017, 36 : S415 - S416
  • [47] Patient-reported outcome measures in depression
    a Steig, David Husdal
    Reinholt, Nina
    Christensen, Anne Bryde
    Hvenegaard Pedersen, Morten
    Arnfred, Sidse Marie
    [J]. NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 77 (02) : 212 - 219
  • [48] Patient-reported outcome measures in urology
    Narang, Gopal L.
    Pannell, Stephanie C.
    Laviana, Aaron A.
    Huen, Kathy H. Y.
    Izard, Jason
    Smith, Angela B.
    Bergman, Jonathan
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (04) : 366 - 374
  • [49] Patient-reported outcome measures for patellofemoral disorders: a systematic review
    Sergio Barroso Rosa
    Andrea Grant
    Peter McEwen
    [J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 3919 - 3927
  • [50] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in paediatric endocrinology
    Richard G. McGee
    Edward Y. B. Zhang
    Jennifer J. G. Tan
    Aiden C. K. Cheung
    Matthew P. Garvey
    [J]. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 22