Use of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a follow-up study

被引:7
|
作者
Baird, Aisling Susan [1 ]
Trussell, James [2 ]
Webb, Anne [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Community Hlth, Abacus Community Sexual Hlth Serv, Sexual & Reprod Hlth, Liverpool L1 4AP, Merseyside, England
[2] Princeton Univ, Off Populat Res, Econ & Publ Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
COST-EFFECTIVENESS;
D O I
10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100733
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objectives Previously we showed that increasing the choice of emergency contraception (EC) guided by medical eligibility did not result in wholesale large-scale usage of ulipristal acetate (UPA). This further 12-month study aimed to answer three questions. (1) Does offering choice of EC lead to change in methods used? (2) Are women who choose UPA more likely than those who choose levonorgestrel (LNG) to continue using condoms for subsequent contraception or to decline any ongoing contraception? (3) Do more women choosing LNG 'quick start' hormonal contraception? Methods A retrospective study of EC episodes (1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013) by quarters. Among women offered all three methods of EC (49.1%) we noted the method chosen, and decisions on ongoing contraception among those choosing either LNG or UPA. Differences were tested for statistical significance. Results In 6110 episodes of EC, LNG was issued in 69.2%, UPA in 26.0%, and a copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) was fitted in 4.8%. Quarter by quarter, the data show a small decline in LNG use, suggesting plateauing by the last quarter, and a significant increase in UPA use between the first and the other three quarters (p<0.001). Use of the Cu-IUD remained static. The percentage of women offered three methods rose to 54.2%. In women offered full choice (3000; 49.1%) we saw a significant increase in choice of UPA, from 39.3% to 48.6% (p<0.001). Women who chose LNG were more likely to quick start (p=0.02) or be continuing contraception already used (p<0.001). Overall, those choosing UPA were more likely to use condoms (p<0.001) but were no more likely to decline ongoing contraception (p=0.13). Conclusions There was a significant increase in women using UPA for EC compared with our previous study, particularly among those wishing to use condoms for continuing contraception. Women choosing LNG were more likely to quick start pills or to continue current hormonal contraception. Detailed attention to continuing contraception following EC may be an important factor in the prevention of unwanted pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 121
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ulipristal Acetate: Review of the Efficacy and Safety of a Newly Approved Agent for Emergency Contraception
    Richardson, Ashley R.
    Maltz, Fraidy N.
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 34 (01) : 24 - 36
  • [42] Ulipristal Acetate: Critical Review About Endometrial and Ovulatory Effects in Emergency Contraception
    Bruno Mozzanega
    Salvatore Gizzo
    Stefania Di Gangi
    Erich Cosmi
    Giovanni Battista Nardelli
    [J]. Reproductive Sciences, 2014, 21 : 678 - 685
  • [43] Levonorgestrel emergency contraception:: results of a sociodemographic study
    Martínez-Zamora, MA
    Bellart, J
    Coll, O
    Balasch, J
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 2005, 125 (02): : 75 - 76
  • [44] Ulipristal Acetate: Critical Review About Endometrial and Ovulatory Effects in Emergency Contraception
    Mozzanega, Bruno
    Gizzo, Salvatore
    Di Gangi, Stefania
    Cosmi, Erich
    Nardelli, Giovanni Battista
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 21 (06) : 678 - 685
  • [45] Ulipristal acetate prevents ovulation more effectively than levonorgestrel: analysis of pooled data from three randomized trials of emergency contraception regimens
    Brache, Vivian
    Cochon, Leila
    Deniaud, Maeva
    Croxatto, Horacio B.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 88 (05) : 611 - 618
  • [46] Emergency contraception for individuals weighing 80 kg or greater: A randomized trial of 30 mg ulipristal acetate and 1.5 mg or 3.0 mg levonorgestrel
    Edelman, Alison
    Jensen, Jeffrey T.
    Brown, Jill
    Thomas, Michael
    Archer, David F.
    Schreiber, Courtney A.
    Teal, Stephanie
    Westhoff, Carolyn
    Dart, Clint
    Blithe, Diana L.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 137
  • [47] Availability of ulipristal acetate: A secret shopper survey of pharmacies in a metropolitan area on emergency contraception
    French, Valerie A.
    Mattingly, Tateum L.
    Rangel, Ariana V.
    Shelton, Annie U.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2019, 59 (06) : 832 - 835
  • [48] Emergency contraception in a country with restricted access to contraceptives and termination of pregnancy, a prospective follow-up study
    Lech, Medard M.
    Ostrowska, Lucyna
    Swiatek, Ewa
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (10) : 1183 - 1187
  • [49] Can We Identify Women at Risk of Pregnancy Despite Using Emergency Contraception? Data From Randomized Trials of Ulipristal Acetate and Levonorgestrel EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Glasier, Anna
    Cameron, Sharon T.
    Blithe, Diana
    Scherrer, Bruno
    Mathe, Henri
    Levy, Delphine
    Gainer, Erin
    Ulmann, Andre
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2013, 68 (03) : 208 - 210
  • [50] Ulipristal Acetate Taken 48-120 Hours After Intercourse for Emergency Contraception
    Fine, Paul
    Mathe, Henri
    Ginde, Savita
    Cullins, Vanessa
    Morfesis, Johanna
    Gainer, Erin
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (02): : 257 - 263