Emergency contraception for individuals weighing 80 kg or greater: A randomized trial of 30 mg ulipristal acetate and 1.5 mg or 3.0 mg levonorgestrel

被引:0
|
作者
Edelman, Alison [1 ]
Jensen, Jeffrey T. [1 ]
Brown, Jill [2 ]
Thomas, Michael [3 ]
Archer, David F. [4 ]
Schreiber, Courtney A. [5 ]
Teal, Stephanie [6 ]
Westhoff, Carolyn [7 ]
Dart, Clint [8 ]
Blithe, Diana L. [9 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept OB GYN, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept OB GYN, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Dept OB GYN, Cincinnati, OH USA
[4] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Clin Res Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Norfolk, VA USA
[5] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Univ Hosp, Dept OB GYN, Cleveland, OH USA
[7] Columbia Univ, Dept OB GYN, New York, NY USA
[8] Hlth Decis, Div Premier Res, Durham, NC USA
[9] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Huma, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
BMI; Emergency contraception; Levonorgestrel; Obesity; Ulipristal acetate; PREGNANCY RATES; PHARMACOKINETICS; OVULATION; OBESITY; SINGLE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110474
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of emergency contraception (EC) regimens used within 72 hours of unprotected intercourse in individuals weighing >= 80 kg. Study design: We enrolled reproductive-aged healthy women in a multicenter, single-blind, randomized study of levonorgestrel 1.5 mg (LNG1X) and 3.0 mg (LNG2X) and ulipristal acetate 30 mg (UPA) (enrollment goal 1200). Key eligibility requirements included regular cycles, weight > /= 80kg, unprotected intercourse within 72 hours, no recent use of hormonal contraception, a negative urine pregnancy test (UPT), and willingness to abstain from intercourse until next menses. To assess our primary outcome of incidence of pregnancy, participants completed home UPTs; if no menses by 2-weeks post-treatment, or a positive UPT, they returned for an in-person visit with quantitative serum human chorionic gonadotropin and ultrasound. Results: We enrolled and randomized 532; 44 were not dosed or not evaluable for primary end point, leaving an analyzable sample of 488 (173 LNG1X, 158 LNG2X, 157 UPA) with similar demographics between groups (mean age 29.6 years [5.74], body mass index 37.09 kg/m(2 ) [6.95]). Five pregnancies occurred (LNG1X n = 1, LNG2X n = 1, UPA n = 3); none occurred during the highest at-risk window (day of ovulation and the 3 days prior). We closed the study before achieving our enrollment goal because the low pregnancy rate in all groups established futility based on an interim blinded analysis. Conclusions: Although slow enrollment limited our study power, we found no differences in pregnancy rates between EC regimens among women weighing 80 kg or more. Our results are not able to refute or support differences between the treatment arms.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] A Randomized trial of mifepristone (10 mg) and levonorgestrel for emergency contraception
    Hamoda, H
    Ashok, PW
    Stalder, C
    Flett, GMM
    Kennedy, E
    Templeton, A
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 104 (06): : 1307 - 1313
  • [2] Is it worth paying more for emergency hormonal contraception? The cost-effectiveness of ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel 1.5 mg
    Thomas, Christine M.
    Schmid, Ramona
    Cameron, Sharon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2010, 36 (04): : 197 - 201
  • [3] Single dose of 1.5 mg Levonorgestrel for emergency contraception
    Okewole, IA
    Arowojolu, AO
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 89 (01) : 57 - 58
  • [4] Levonorgestrel pharmacokinetics in plasma and milk of lactating women who take 1.5 mg for emergency contraception
    Gainer, E.
    Massai, R.
    Lillo, S.
    Reyes, V.
    Forcelledo, M. L.
    Caviedes, R.
    Villarroel, C.
    Bouyer, J.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (06) : 1578 - 1584
  • [5] Mifepristone 5 mg versus 10 mg for emergency contraception: double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Lluis Carbonell, Josep
    Garcia, Ramon
    Gonzalez, Adriana
    Breto, Andres
    Sanchez, Carlos
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2015, 7 : 95 - 102
  • [6] A randomized controlled pilot study of ulipristal acetate for abnormal bleeding among women using the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system
    Fava, Mariana
    Peloggia, Alessandra
    Baccaro, Luiz F.
    Castro, Sara
    Carvalho, Nelsilene
    Bahamondes, Luis
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2020, 149 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [7] Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg Versus Dulaglutide 1.5 mg in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-11)
    Frias, Juan P.
    Bonora, Enzo
    Nevarez Ruiz, Luis
    Li, Ying G.
    Yu, Zhuoxin
    Milicevic, Zvonko
    Malik, Raleigh
    Bethel, M. Angelyn
    Cox, David A.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2021, 44 (03) : 765 - 773
  • [8] Ovulation rates after oral administration of the 1.5-mg levonorgestrel emergency contraception regimen among normal-weight and obese women
    Natavio, M.
    Nelson, A.
    Segall-Gutierrez, P.
    Stanczyk, F.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 98 (04) : 359 - 360
  • [9] The effects on ovarian activity of delaying versus immediately restarting combined oral contraception after missing three pills and taking ulipristal acetate 30 mg
    Banh, Camille
    Rautenberg, Tanja
    Duijkers, Ingrid
    Borenzstein, Pascale
    Monteil, Catherine
    Levy-Gompel, Delphine
    Klipping, Christine
    Scherrer, Bruno
    Glasier, Anna
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2020, 102 (03) : 145 - 151
  • [10] Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of two intravenous morphine dosages (0.10 mg/kg and 0.15 mg/kg) in emergency department patients with moderate to severe acute pain
    Birnbaum, Adrienne
    Esses, David
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Holden, Lynne
    Gallagher, E. John
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 49 (04) : 445 - 453