Mifepristone 5 mg versus 10 mg for emergency contraception: double-blind randomized clinical trial

被引:7
|
作者
Lluis Carbonell, Josep [1 ]
Garcia, Ramon [2 ]
Gonzalez, Adriana [2 ]
Breto, Andres [2 ]
Sanchez, Carlos [2 ]
机构
[1] Mediterranea Med Clin, Salvador Guinot 14, Valencia 46017, Spain
[2] Eusebio Hernandez Gynecol & Obstet Teaching Hosp, Havana, Cuba
关键词
mifepristone; emergency contraception;
D O I
10.2147/IJWH.S65793
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose: To estimate the efficacy and safety of 5 mg and 10 mg mifepristone for emergency contraception up to 144 hours after unprotected coitus. Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial was carried out at Eusebio Hernandez Hospital (Havana, Cuba). A total of 2,418 women who requested emergency contraception after unprotected coitus received either 5 mg or 10 mg mifepristone. The variables for assessing efficacy were the pregnancies that occurred and the fraction of pregnancies that were prevented. Other variables assessed were the side effects of mifepristone, vaginal bleeding, and changes in the date of the following menstruation. Results: There were 15/1,206 (1.2%) and 9/1,212 (0.7%) pregnancies in the 5 mg and 10 mg group, respectively (P=0.107). There were 88% and 93% prevented pregnancies in the 5 mg and 10 mg group, respectively. The side effect profiles were similar in both groups. Delayed menstruation >= 7 days was experienced by 4.9% and 11.0% of subjects in the 5 mg and 10 mg group, respectively (P=0.001). There was a significant high failure rate for women weighing >75 kg in the 5 mg group. Conclusion: It would be advisable to use the 10 mg dose of mifepristone for emergency contraception as there was a trend suggesting that the failure rate of the larger dose was lower.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 102
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Randomized trial of mifepristone (10 mg) and levonorgestrel for emergency contraception
    Hamoda, H
    Ashok, PW
    Stalder, C
    Flett, GMM
    Kennedy, E
    Templeton, A
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 104 (06): : 1307 - 1313
  • [2] Expanded clinical trial of emergency contraception with 10 mg mifepristone
    Xiao, BL
    Zhao, H
    Piaggio, G
    von Hertzen, H
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2003, 68 (06) : 431 - 437
  • [3] Emergency contraception in Cuba with 10 mg of mifepristone
    Esteve, J. L. Carbonell
    Garcia, R.
    Breto, A.
    Llorente, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2007, 12 (02): : 162 - 167
  • [4] Effectiveness and safety of levocetirizine 10 mg versus a combination of levocetirizine 5 mg and montelukast 10 mg in chronic urticaria resistant to levocetirizine 5 mg: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Sarkar, Tushar Kanti
    Sil, Amrita
    Pal, Santasmita
    Ghosh, Chinmoy
    Das, Nilay Kanti
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY VENEREOLOGY & LEPROLOGY, 2017, 83 (05): : 561 - 568
  • [5] A randomized double-blind comparison of two single doses of mifepristone for emergency contraception
    Xiao, BL
    von Hertzen, H
    Zhao, H
    Piaggio, G
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (12) : 3084 - 3089
  • [6] A randomized double-blind multicenter study on comparing levonorgestrel and mifepristone for emergency contraception
    吴尚纯
    王翠萍
    王幼劬
    程渭玉
    左诗慧
    李红
    徐晓
    汪蓉芬
    董敬
    [J]. 生殖医学杂志, 1999, (S1) : 43 - 46
  • [8] Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Carbonell Esteve, Josep Lluis
    Acosta, Rita
    Perez, Yasmirian
    Rodriguez, Barbara
    Seigler, Isabel
    Sanchez, Carlos
    Tomasi, Giuseppe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2013, 5 : 361 - 369
  • [9] Combined estimates of effectiveness of mifepristone 10 mg in emergency contraception
    Piaggio, G
    Heng, Z
    von Hertzen, H
    Xiao, BL
    Cheng, LN
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2003, 68 (06) : 439 - 446
  • [10] Comparison of omeprazole 20 mg and 10 mg versus cisapride 10 mg QID on the relief of heartburn: Results of a randomized double-blind study
    Galmiche, JP
    Barthelemy, P
    Barret, S
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 110 (04) : A113 - A113