Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Targeted Biopsy to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Hoffmann, Manuela A. [1 ,2 ]
Taymoorian, Kasra
Ruf, Christian [3 ]
Gerhards, Arnd [4 ]
Leyendecker, Karlheinz
Stein, Thomas
Jakobs, Frank M. [5 ]
Schreckenberger, Mathias [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Nucl Med, Langenbeckstr 1, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
[2] Bundeswehr Med Serv Headquarters, Supervisory Ctr Med Radiat Protect, Von Kuhl Str 50, D-56070 Koblenz, Germany
[3] Bundeswehr Cent Hosp, Dept Urol, Koblenz, Germany
[4] Radiol Inst Dr von Essen, Koblenz, Germany
[5] German Air Force Ctr Aerosp Med, Dept Epidemiol, Furstenfeldbruck, Germany
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; prostatic neoplasms; diagnostic imaging; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; ULTRASOUND FUSION; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SYSTEMATIC BIOPSY; SCORING SYSTEM; INITIAL BIOPSY; GUIDED BIOPSY; MEN; GUIDELINES; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.21873/anticanres.12149
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/Aim: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with ultrasound-fusion-targeted biopsy of the prostate intends to increase diagnostic precision, which has to be clarified. Patients and Methods: We performed multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by ultrasound-fusion-guided perineal biopsy in 99 male patients with elevated prostate-specific-antigen and previous negative standard biopsy-procedures. Results: In 33/99 patients (33%) no malignancy could be confirmed by histopathology. Low-grade carcinomas (Gleason-Score 6+7a) were found in 42/66 (64%) and high-grade carcinomas (Gleason-Score >= 7b) in 24/66 (36%) men. A high-grade carcinoma corresponded to PI-RADS 4 or 5 (suspected malignancy) in 21/24 cases, which accounted for a sensitivity of 88% and negative-predictive-value of 85% (p= 0.002). Differentiation between high-/low-grade carcinomas (Gleason-Score <= 7a vs. >= 7b) by means of PI-RADS related to a sensitivity of 88% and a negative-predictive-value of 70% (p= 0.74). Conclusion: The results support the view that multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion-guided biopsy promotes considerably higher detection rates of clinically relevant prostate malignancies than do conventional diagnostic procedures. With regard to differentiation between high-and low-grade carcinomas, no significant difference was demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页码:6871 / 6877
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Opportunities and Challenges in the Era of Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (04): : 1072 - 1073
  • [22] PTEN and ERG detection in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy compared to systematic biopsy
    Baumgartner, Erin
    Pena, Maria del Carmen Rodriguez
    Eich, Marie-Lisa
    Porter, Kristin K.
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Gordetsky, Jennifer
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 90 : 20 - 26
  • [23] Multiple Regions of Interest on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging are Not Associated with Increased Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Fusion Biopsy
    Patel, Neal
    Halpern, Joshua A.
    Kasabwala, Khushabu
    Cricco-Lizza, Eliza
    Herman, Michael
    Margolis, Daniel
    Xu, Chris
    Robinson, Brian D.
    Wang, Yi
    McClure, Timothy
    Hu, Jim C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (03): : 559 - 563
  • [24] COMPARISON OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-FUSION BIOPSY AND STANDARD TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND BIOPSY : CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION RATE
    Byun, Hye Jin
    Jung, Wonho
    Ha, Ji Yong
    Kim, Byung Hoon
    Park, Chol Hee
    Kim, Chun Il
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E516 - E516
  • [25] Visibility of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasound during fusion with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for biopsy
    van de Ven, Wendy J. M.
    Sedelaar, J. P. Michiel
    van der Leest, Marloes M. G.
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Huisman, Henkjan J.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2016, 40 (04) : 745 - 750
  • [26] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with targeted fusion biopsy: is the time now?
    Laviana, Aaron A.
    Penson, David F.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [27] Clinical Outcome Following Low Suspicion Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Benign Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy to Detect Prostate Cancer
    Boesen, Lars
    Norgaard, Nis
    Logager, Vibeke
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (02): : 310 - 315
  • [28] Reasons for missing clinically significant prostate cancer by targeted magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy
    Klingebiel, M.
    Arsov, C.
    Ullrich, T.
    Quentin, M.
    Al-Monajjed, R.
    Mally, D.
    Sawicki, L. M.
    Hiester, A.
    Esposito, I
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 137
  • [29] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Ingole, Sarang M.
    Mehta, Rajeev U.
    Kazi, Zubair N.
    Bhuyar, Rutuja, V
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2021, 31 (01): : 65 - 77
  • [30] Prostate Cancer: Targeted Fusion Biopsy with multiparametric MRI
    von Hardenberg, Jost
    Westhoff, Niklas
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2019, 50 (05) : 473 - 474