Mechanical Ventilation During Resuscitation: How Manual Chest Compressions Affect a Ventilator's Function

被引:13
|
作者
Speer, Tillmann [1 ]
Dersch, Wolfgang [1 ]
Kleine, Bjoern [1 ]
Neuhaus, Christian [2 ]
Kill, Clemens [1 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ, Fac Med, Dept Emergency Med, Marburg, Germany
[2] WEINMANN Emergency Med Technol GmbH Co KG, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; CCSV; Chest compressions; Chest compression synchronized ventilation; Pulmonary; Respiratory; Simulation model; Ventilation; POSITIVE-PRESSURE VENTILATION; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; PORCINE MODEL; HYPERVENTILATION; SURVIVAL; DEPTH; CPR;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-017-0615-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Guidelines for resuscitation recommend positive-pressure ventilation with a fixed ventilation rate as provided by an automated transport ventilator during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with a secured airway. We investigated the influence of manual chest compressions (CC) on the accuracy of ventilator presets and the quality of CC with intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV), bilevel ventilation (BiLevel), and the novel ventilation mode chest compression synchronized ventilation (CCSV) in a simulation model. Ninety paramedics performed continuous CC for 2 min on a modified advanced life support mannequin with a realistic lung model. IPPV, BiLevel, and CCSV were applied in a randomized order. CCSV is a novel type of pressure-controlled ventilation with short insufflations synchronized with CC, which are stopped before decompression begins. The ventilator presets (tolerance range) were IPPV Vt = 450 (400-500) ml, PEEP = 0 hPa, f = 10/min; BiLevel Pinsp = 19 (17.1-20.9) hPa, PEEP = 5 hPa, f = 10/min; CCSV Pinsp = 60 (54-66) hPa, PEEP = 0 hPa, Tinsp = 205 ms, f = CC rate. Preset values were compared with the measured results. Values were defined as correct within a tolerance range. Quality of CC was evaluated using ERC guidelines (depth > 50 mm, CC rate 100-120/min). Median (25th/75th percentiles) IPPV V (t) = 399 (386/411) ml, BiLevel Pinsp = 22.0 (19.7/25.6) hPa, and CCSV Pinsp = 55.2 (52.6/56.7) hPa. Relative frequency of delivering correct ventilation parameters according to ventilation mode: IPPV = 40 (0/100)% vs. BiLevel = 20 (0/100)%, p = 0.37 and vs. CCSV = 71 (50/83)%, p < 0.02. Pinsp was too high in BiLevel = 80 (0/100)% vs. CCSV = 0(0/0)%, p < 0.001. CC depth: IPPV 56 (48/63) mm, BiLevel 57 (48/63) mm, CCSV 60 (52/67) mm; CC rate: IPPV 117 (105/124)/min, BiLevel 116 (107/123)/min, CCSV 117 (107/125)/min. When compared to IPPV and BiLevel, CCSV works best with preset values, without exceeding the upper pressure preset during simulated CPR. Quality of CC is not negatively affected by any of the ventilation patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:2333 / 2344
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ultrasound guided chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    P Benato
    M Zanatta
    V Cianci
    Critical Ultrasound Journal, 7 (Suppl 1)
  • [32] Quality of chest compressions during pediatric resuscitation with 15:2 and 30:2 compressions-to-ventilation ratio in a simulated scenario
    Manrique, Gema
    Gonzalez, Araceli
    Iguiniz, Maitane
    Grau, Ana
    Toledo, Blanca
    Garcia, Miriam
    Lopez-Herce, Jesus
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [33] Do mechanical chest compressions give better pulmonary resuscitation?
    Vangsnes, Liv-Ellen
    TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2015, 135 (18) : 1636 - 1636
  • [34] Synchronized Bag-valve-mask Ventilation With Continuous Chest Compressions Provides Adequate Ventilation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
    Sell, Rebecca E.
    Wilkes, Nathan
    Sarno, Renee
    Lawrence, Brenna
    Fisher, Roger
    Clyons, Jeff
    Dunford, James V.
    Davis, Daniel P.
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (18) : S1455 - S1455
  • [35] Assessment of Area Duty Cycle in Manual Chest Compressions During Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
    Ruiz de Gauna, Sofia
    Ruiz, Jesus M.
    Gonzalez-Otero, Digna M.
    Leturiondo, Mikel
    Gutierrez, Jose J.
    Arana, Iker
    Russell, James K.
    Daya, Mohamud
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138
  • [36] Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation With Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation Reply
    Rubertsson, Sten
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (21): : 2234 - 2235
  • [37] Effectiveness of mechanical versus manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A pilot study
    Dickinson, ET
    Verdile, VP
    Schneider, RM
    Salluzzo, RF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 16 (03): : 289 - 292
  • [38] Mechanical vs. Manual Chest Compressions for Cardiac Arrest
    Porritt, Kylie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2019, 119 (05) : 21 - 21
  • [39] Manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest - With or without mechanical CPR?
    Soar, Jasmeet
    Nolan, Jerry P.
    RESUSCITATION, 2014, 85 (06) : 705 - 706
  • [40] Metrics of impulsiveness of manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Uriguen, Jose Antonio
    de Gauna, Sofia Ruiz
    Gutierrez, Jose Julio
    Azcarate, Izaskun
    Leturiondo, Mikel
    Redondo, Koldo
    Russell, James Knox
    Daya, Mohamud Ramzan
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (07)