Mechanical Ventilation During Resuscitation: How Manual Chest Compressions Affect a Ventilator's Function

被引:13
|
作者
Speer, Tillmann [1 ]
Dersch, Wolfgang [1 ]
Kleine, Bjoern [1 ]
Neuhaus, Christian [2 ]
Kill, Clemens [1 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ, Fac Med, Dept Emergency Med, Marburg, Germany
[2] WEINMANN Emergency Med Technol GmbH Co KG, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; CCSV; Chest compressions; Chest compression synchronized ventilation; Pulmonary; Respiratory; Simulation model; Ventilation; POSITIVE-PRESSURE VENTILATION; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; PORCINE MODEL; HYPERVENTILATION; SURVIVAL; DEPTH; CPR;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-017-0615-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Guidelines for resuscitation recommend positive-pressure ventilation with a fixed ventilation rate as provided by an automated transport ventilator during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with a secured airway. We investigated the influence of manual chest compressions (CC) on the accuracy of ventilator presets and the quality of CC with intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV), bilevel ventilation (BiLevel), and the novel ventilation mode chest compression synchronized ventilation (CCSV) in a simulation model. Ninety paramedics performed continuous CC for 2 min on a modified advanced life support mannequin with a realistic lung model. IPPV, BiLevel, and CCSV were applied in a randomized order. CCSV is a novel type of pressure-controlled ventilation with short insufflations synchronized with CC, which are stopped before decompression begins. The ventilator presets (tolerance range) were IPPV Vt = 450 (400-500) ml, PEEP = 0 hPa, f = 10/min; BiLevel Pinsp = 19 (17.1-20.9) hPa, PEEP = 5 hPa, f = 10/min; CCSV Pinsp = 60 (54-66) hPa, PEEP = 0 hPa, Tinsp = 205 ms, f = CC rate. Preset values were compared with the measured results. Values were defined as correct within a tolerance range. Quality of CC was evaluated using ERC guidelines (depth > 50 mm, CC rate 100-120/min). Median (25th/75th percentiles) IPPV V (t) = 399 (386/411) ml, BiLevel Pinsp = 22.0 (19.7/25.6) hPa, and CCSV Pinsp = 55.2 (52.6/56.7) hPa. Relative frequency of delivering correct ventilation parameters according to ventilation mode: IPPV = 40 (0/100)% vs. BiLevel = 20 (0/100)%, p = 0.37 and vs. CCSV = 71 (50/83)%, p < 0.02. Pinsp was too high in BiLevel = 80 (0/100)% vs. CCSV = 0(0/0)%, p < 0.001. CC depth: IPPV 56 (48/63) mm, BiLevel 57 (48/63) mm, CCSV 60 (52/67) mm; CC rate: IPPV 117 (105/124)/min, BiLevel 116 (107/123)/min, CCSV 117 (107/125)/min. When compared to IPPV and BiLevel, CCSV works best with preset values, without exceeding the upper pressure preset during simulated CPR. Quality of CC is not negatively affected by any of the ventilation patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:2333 / 2344
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest
    Wang, Peter L.
    Brooks, Steven C.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (08):
  • [22] Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest
    Brooks, Steven C.
    Hassan, Nizar
    Bigham, Blair L.
    Morrison, Laurie J.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (02):
  • [23] Chest compressions during ventilation in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation cause fragmentation of the airflow
    Van Den Daele, Cel
    Vanwulpen, Maxim
    Hachimi-Idrissi, Said
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 50 : 455 - 458
  • [24] VENTILATION AND CHEST COMPRESSIONS DURING CARDIO PULMONARY RESUSCITATION: SIMULATION WITH A SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED LUNG MODEL
    Cordioli, R. L.
    Rey, N.
    Suppan, L.
    Granier, J. M.
    Hengy, B.
    Akoumianaki, E.
    Niquille, M.
    Savary, D.
    Lyazidi, A.
    Brochard, L.
    Richard, J. C.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 39 : S314 - S315
  • [25] Automatic mechanical chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: What is the evidence for its use?
    Wik, Lars
    Rubertsson, Sten
    RESUSCITATION, 2015, 94 : A8 - A8
  • [26] CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION BY CHEST COMPRESSIONS VERSUS VENTILATION PLUS CHEST COMPRESSIONS IN A PEDIATRIC ASPHYXIAL CARDIAC ARREST ANIMAL MODEL
    Botran, M.
    Urbano, J.
    Solana, M. J.
    Ballestero, Y.
    Lopez-Herce, J.
    Vinciguerra, D.
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 : 31 - 31
  • [27] Limiting interruptions of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Kern, KB
    RESUSCITATION, 2003, 58 (03) : 273 - 274
  • [28] Lay rescuers' characteristics affect quality of chest compressions during cardiac-only resuscitation
    Nishiyama, Chika
    Iwami, Taku
    Kawamura, Takashi
    Ando, Masahiko
    Berg, Robert A.
    Yonemoto, Naohiro
    Fukuda, Risa
    Yuasa, Haruyuki
    Kada, Akiko
    Yokoyama, Hiroyuki
    Nonogi, Hiroshi
    CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (16) : 581 - 581
  • [29] Ultrasound guided chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Zanatta, Mirko
    Benato, Piero
    Cianci, Vito
    RESUSCITATION, 2015, 87 : E13 - E14
  • [30] Quality of chest compressions during pediatric resuscitation with 15:2 and 30:2 compressions-to-ventilation ratio in a simulated scenario
    Gema Manrique
    Araceli González
    Maitane Iguiñiz
    Ana Grau
    Blanca Toledo
    Miriam García
    Jesús López-Herce
    Scientific Reports, 10