Transmembrane potential changes caused by monophasic and biphasic shocks

被引:7
|
作者
Zhou, XH [1 ]
Smith, WM [1 ]
Justice, RK [1 ]
Wayland, JL [1 ]
Ideker, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Med, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
depolarization; hyperpolarization; action potential duration; defibrillation;
D O I
10.1152/ajpheart.1998.275.5.H1798
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Transmembrane potential change (Delta V-m) during shocks was recorded by a double-barrel microelectrode in 12 isolated guinea pig papillary muscles. After 10 S1 stimuli, square-wave S2 shocks of both polarities were given consisting of 10-ms monophasic and 10/10-ms and 5/5-ms biphasic waveforms that created potential gradients from 1.1 +/- 0.3 to 11.9 +/- 0.4 V/cm. S2 shocks were applied with 30, 60- to 70-, and 90- to 130-ms S1-S2 coupling intervals so that they occurred during the plateau, late portion of the plateau, and phase 3 of the action potential, respectively. Some shocks were given across as well as along the fiber orientation. The shocks caused hyperpolarization with one polarity and depolarization with the opposite polarity. The ratio of the magnitude of hyperpolarization to that of depolarization at the three S1-S2 coupling intervals was 1.5 +/- 0.3, 1.1 +/- 0.2, and 0.5 +/- 0.2, respectively. Delta V-m, during the shock was significantly greater for the monophasic than for the two biphasic shocks. The prolongation of total repolarizing time (TRT) was significantly greater for monophasic (119.8 +/- 19.1%) and 10/10-ms biphasic (120.5 +/- 18.2%) than for 5/5-ms biphasic (113.0 +/- 12.9%) waveforms. The dispersion of the normalized TRT between instances of hyperpolarization and depolarization caused by the two shock polarities was 7.4 +/- 7.1% for monophasic, 3.0 +/- 4.1% for 10/10-ms biphasic, and 2.8 +/- 3.1% for 5/5-ms biphasic shocks (P < 0.05 for monophasic vs. biphasic), Shock fields along fibers produced a larger Delta V-m and prolongation of TRT than those across fibers. We conclude that 1) a change in shock polarity causes an asymmetrical change in membrane polarization depending on shock timing; 2) the 5/5-ms biphasic waveform causes the smallest Delta V-m, prolongs repolarization the least, and causes the smallest polarity-dependent dispersion; and 3) the changes in transmembrane potential and repolarization are influenced by fiber orientation.
引用
收藏
页码:H1798 / H1807
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reduced arrhythmogenicity of biphasic versus monophasic T-wave shocks - Implications for defibrillation efficacy
    Behrens, S
    Li, CL
    Kirchhof, P
    Fabritz, FL
    Franz, MR
    CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (08) : 1974 - 1980
  • [42] Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: Implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold
    Behrens, S
    Li, CL
    Franz, MR
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (09): : 2179 - 2187
  • [43] Epicardial sock mapping following monophasic and biphasic shocks of equal voltage with an endocardial lead system
    Usui, M
    Callihan, RL
    Walker, RG
    Walcott, GP
    Rollins, DL
    Wolf, PD
    Smith, WM
    Ideker, RE
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 7 (04) : 322 - 334
  • [44] EFFECTS OF MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC SHOCKS ON ACTION-POTENTIALS DURING VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION IN DOGS
    ZHOU, XH
    WOLF, PD
    ROLLINS, DL
    AFEWORK, Y
    SMITH, WM
    IDEKER, RE
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1993, 73 (02) : 325 - 334
  • [45] PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF BIPHASIC AND MONOPHASIC SHOCKS FOR IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS USING ENDOCARDIAL LEADS
    SAKSENA, S
    AN, HL
    MEHRA, R
    DEGROOT, P
    KROL, RB
    BURKHARDT, E
    MEHTA, D
    JOHN, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1992, 70 (03): : 304 - 310
  • [46] Effect of coupling interval in failed defibrillation with long postshock responses using monophasic and biphasic shocks
    Tovar, OH
    Jones, JL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (02) : 372A - 372A
  • [47] Monophasic versus biphasic waveform shocks for atrial fibrillation cardioversion in patients with concomitant amiodarone therapy
    Kawabata, Vitor S.
    Vianna, Caio B.
    Moretti, Miguel A.
    Gonzalez, Maria M.
    Ferreira, Joao F.
    Timerman, Sergio
    Cesar, Luiz A.
    EUROPACE, 2007, 9 (02): : 143 - 146
  • [48] Superiority of biphasic over monophasic defibrillation shocks is attributable to less intracellular calcium transient heterogeneity
    Hwang, Gyo-Seung
    Tang, Liang
    Joung, Boyoung
    Morita, Norishige
    Hayashi, Hideki
    Karagueuzian, Hrayr S.
    Weiss, James N.
    Lin, Shien-Fong
    Chen, Peng-Sheng
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 52 (10) : 828 - 835
  • [50] Attenuated adult biphasic shocks compared with weight-based monophasic shocks in a swine model of prolonged pediatric ventricular fibrillation
    Berg, RA
    Chapman, FW
    Berg, MD
    Hilwig, RW
    Banville, I
    Walker, RG
    Nova, RC
    Sherrill, D
    Kern, KB
    RESUSCITATION, 2004, 61 (02) : 189 - 197