Transmembrane potential changes caused by monophasic and biphasic shocks

被引:7
|
作者
Zhou, XH [1 ]
Smith, WM [1 ]
Justice, RK [1 ]
Wayland, JL [1 ]
Ideker, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Med, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
depolarization; hyperpolarization; action potential duration; defibrillation;
D O I
10.1152/ajpheart.1998.275.5.H1798
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Transmembrane potential change (Delta V-m) during shocks was recorded by a double-barrel microelectrode in 12 isolated guinea pig papillary muscles. After 10 S1 stimuli, square-wave S2 shocks of both polarities were given consisting of 10-ms monophasic and 10/10-ms and 5/5-ms biphasic waveforms that created potential gradients from 1.1 +/- 0.3 to 11.9 +/- 0.4 V/cm. S2 shocks were applied with 30, 60- to 70-, and 90- to 130-ms S1-S2 coupling intervals so that they occurred during the plateau, late portion of the plateau, and phase 3 of the action potential, respectively. Some shocks were given across as well as along the fiber orientation. The shocks caused hyperpolarization with one polarity and depolarization with the opposite polarity. The ratio of the magnitude of hyperpolarization to that of depolarization at the three S1-S2 coupling intervals was 1.5 +/- 0.3, 1.1 +/- 0.2, and 0.5 +/- 0.2, respectively. Delta V-m, during the shock was significantly greater for the monophasic than for the two biphasic shocks. The prolongation of total repolarizing time (TRT) was significantly greater for monophasic (119.8 +/- 19.1%) and 10/10-ms biphasic (120.5 +/- 18.2%) than for 5/5-ms biphasic (113.0 +/- 12.9%) waveforms. The dispersion of the normalized TRT between instances of hyperpolarization and depolarization caused by the two shock polarities was 7.4 +/- 7.1% for monophasic, 3.0 +/- 4.1% for 10/10-ms biphasic, and 2.8 +/- 3.1% for 5/5-ms biphasic shocks (P < 0.05 for monophasic vs. biphasic), Shock fields along fibers produced a larger Delta V-m and prolongation of TRT than those across fibers. We conclude that 1) a change in shock polarity causes an asymmetrical change in membrane polarization depending on shock timing; 2) the 5/5-ms biphasic waveform causes the smallest Delta V-m, prolongs repolarization the least, and causes the smallest polarity-dependent dispersion; and 3) the changes in transmembrane potential and repolarization are influenced by fiber orientation.
引用
收藏
页码:H1798 / H1807
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of polarity for monophasic and biphasic shocks on defibrillation efficacy with an endocardial system
    Usui, M
    Walcott, GP
    Strickberger, SA
    Rollins, DL
    Smith, WM
    Ideker, RE
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 19 (01): : 65 - 71
  • [22] Membrane refractoriness and excitation induced in cardiac fibers by monophasic and biphasic shocks
    Trayanova, N
    Bray, MA
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 8 (07) : 745 - 757
  • [23] Disparate effects of biphasic and monophasic shocks on postshock refractory period dispersion
    Sims, JJ
    Miller, AW
    Ujhelyi, MR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 274 (06): : H1943 - H1949
  • [24] Prospective randomized comparison of anodal monophasic shocks versus biphasic cathodal shocks on defibrillation energy requirements
    Strickberger, SA
    Daoud, E
    Goyal, R
    Chan, KK
    Bogun, F
    Castellani, M
    Harvey, M
    Horwood, LE
    Niebauer, M
    Man, KC
    Morady, F
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1996, 131 (05) : 961 - 965
  • [25] FACTORS WHICH MAY EXPLAIN DIFFERENT DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLDS FOR MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC SHOCKS
    DILLON, SM
    WANG, T
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 64 (02) : A206 - A206
  • [26] Comparison of serial monophasic and biphasic shocks in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Mueller, Dirk
    Flaschar, Daniel
    Schnitzer, Luise
    Arntz, Hans-Richard
    CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (18) : 1199 - 1199
  • [27] External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation:: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks
    Ricard, P
    Lévy, S
    Boccara, G
    Lakhal, E
    Bardy, G
    EUROPACE, 2001, 3 (02): : 96 - 99
  • [28] Comparison of serial monophasic and biphasic shocks in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Mueller, D.
    Flaschar, D.
    Schnitzer, L.
    Arntz, H. -R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 468 - 468
  • [29] Biphasic and monophasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a meta analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Faddy, SC
    Powell, J
    Craig, JC
    RESUSCITATION, 2003, 58 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [30] Multicenter comparison of truncated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation
    Bardy, GH
    Marchlinski, FE
    Sharma, AD
    Worley, SJ
    Luceri, RM
    Yee, R
    Halperin, BD
    Fellows, CL
    Ahern, TS
    Chilson, DA
    Packer, DL
    Wilber, DJ
    Mattioni, TA
    Reddy, R
    Kronmal, RA
    Lazzara, R
    CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (10) : 2507 - 2514