Transmembrane potential changes caused by monophasic and biphasic shocks

被引:7
|
作者
Zhou, XH [1 ]
Smith, WM [1 ]
Justice, RK [1 ]
Wayland, JL [1 ]
Ideker, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Med, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
depolarization; hyperpolarization; action potential duration; defibrillation;
D O I
10.1152/ajpheart.1998.275.5.H1798
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Transmembrane potential change (Delta V-m) during shocks was recorded by a double-barrel microelectrode in 12 isolated guinea pig papillary muscles. After 10 S1 stimuli, square-wave S2 shocks of both polarities were given consisting of 10-ms monophasic and 10/10-ms and 5/5-ms biphasic waveforms that created potential gradients from 1.1 +/- 0.3 to 11.9 +/- 0.4 V/cm. S2 shocks were applied with 30, 60- to 70-, and 90- to 130-ms S1-S2 coupling intervals so that they occurred during the plateau, late portion of the plateau, and phase 3 of the action potential, respectively. Some shocks were given across as well as along the fiber orientation. The shocks caused hyperpolarization with one polarity and depolarization with the opposite polarity. The ratio of the magnitude of hyperpolarization to that of depolarization at the three S1-S2 coupling intervals was 1.5 +/- 0.3, 1.1 +/- 0.2, and 0.5 +/- 0.2, respectively. Delta V-m, during the shock was significantly greater for the monophasic than for the two biphasic shocks. The prolongation of total repolarizing time (TRT) was significantly greater for monophasic (119.8 +/- 19.1%) and 10/10-ms biphasic (120.5 +/- 18.2%) than for 5/5-ms biphasic (113.0 +/- 12.9%) waveforms. The dispersion of the normalized TRT between instances of hyperpolarization and depolarization caused by the two shock polarities was 7.4 +/- 7.1% for monophasic, 3.0 +/- 4.1% for 10/10-ms biphasic, and 2.8 +/- 3.1% for 5/5-ms biphasic shocks (P < 0.05 for monophasic vs. biphasic), Shock fields along fibers produced a larger Delta V-m and prolongation of TRT than those across fibers. We conclude that 1) a change in shock polarity causes an asymmetrical change in membrane polarization depending on shock timing; 2) the 5/5-ms biphasic waveform causes the smallest Delta V-m, prolongs repolarization the least, and causes the smallest polarity-dependent dispersion; and 3) the changes in transmembrane potential and repolarization are influenced by fiber orientation.
引用
收藏
页码:H1798 / H1807
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transmembrane potential changes and action potential prolongation during monophasic and biphasic shocks
    Zhou, X
    Smith, WM
    Justice, RK
    Ideker, RE
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 29 (02) : 46127 - 46127
  • [2] Transmembrane potential changes caused by shocks in guinea pig papillary muscle
    Zhou, XH
    Smith, WM
    Rollins, DL
    Ideker, RE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 271 (06): : H2536 - H2546
  • [3] Effects of biphasic shocks on the spatial distribution of the transmembrane potential
    Gillis, AM
    Fast, VG
    Rohr, S
    Kleber, AG
    CIRCULATION, 1997, 96 (08) : 688 - 688
  • [4] Transmembrane potential change caused by a biphasic shock
    Zhou, X
    Smith, WM
    Justice, RK
    Ideker, RE
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (02) : 121A - 121A
  • [5] TRANSMEMBRANE POTENTIAL CHANGES INDUCED BY SHOCKS
    ZHOU, XH
    BLITCHINGTON, TF
    SMITH, WM
    IDEKER, RE
    KNISLEY, SB
    CIRCULATION, 1993, 88 (04) : 625 - 625
  • [6] Nonlinear changes of transmembrane potential caused by defibrillation shocks in strands of cultured myocytes
    Fast, VG
    Rohr, S
    Ideker, RE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 278 (03): : H688 - H697
  • [7] A comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for external defibrillation of humans
    Herre, JM
    Higgins, SL
    Epstein, AE
    Greer, S
    Friedman, PL
    Gleva, MJ
    Porterfield, JG
    Chapman, FW
    Finkel, ES
    Schmitt, PW
    Nova, RC
    Greene, HL
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 173 - 173
  • [8] REFRACTORY PERIOD EXTENSION FOR MONOPHASIC VERSUS BIPHASIC SHOCKS
    SWEENEY, RJ
    GILL, RM
    REID, PR
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1994, : A422 - A422
  • [9] Lidocaine increases the proarrhythmic effects of monophasic but not biphasic shocks
    Sims, JJ
    Miller, AW
    Ujhelyi, MR
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (12) : 1363 - 1368
  • [10] Wavefront termination with monophasic and biphasic shocks: A simulation study
    Trayanova, N
    Bray, MA
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 18, PTS 1-5, 1997, 18 : 1289 - 1290