Does R&D intensity promote the adoption of circular supply chain management? Evidence from China

被引:22
|
作者
Chen, Xiaohong [1 ]
Chen, Lujie [2 ]
Jiang, Mengqi [2 ]
Yan, Ji [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Technol & Business, Changsha 410205, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Int Business Sch Suzhou, 8 Chongwen Rd, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Durham, Ctr Innovat & Technol Management, Business Sch, Durham DH1 3LB, England
关键词
CSCM; Circular economy; Innovation; Institutional theory; WASTE-TO-ENERGY; FIRM ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; MODERATING ROLE; INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES; DEVELOPMENT SPILLOVERS; INNOVATION ACTIVITIES; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; STATE OWNERSHIP; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.10.015
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the relationship between research and development (R&D) intensity and circular supply chain management (CSCM) adoption of high-tech manufacturing companies in China to deepen our understanding of how to improve CSCM adoption in emerging economies. In particular, we examine the moderating effect of three kinds of institutional pressures (i.e., regulatory pressure from governmental regulations, mimetic pressure from industry competition, and normative pressure from overseas customer demand) from the perspective of institutional theory. Based on the panel data of 310 Chinese listed companies from 2006 to 2019, we find that R&D intensity positively affects firms' CSCM adoption. We further observe that this positive effect is strengthened when the ratio of state-owned shares or the degree of industry competition is higher. However, overseas operating income does not affect the impact of R&D intensity on CSCM adoption. Our study contributes to the literature on the innovation - circular economy debate, confirming the positive effect of R&D intensity on firms' CSCM adoption, and provides insights into moderating effects on this relationship in an emerging economy context.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 166
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stability Analysis of R&D Cooperation in a Supply Chain
    Xu, Luyun
    Liang, Dong
    Duan, Zhenjie
    Xiao, Xu
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2015, 2015
  • [32] R&D for tomorrow’s casting supply chain
    [J]. Metal Casting Design and Purchasing, 2019, 21 (05): : 33 - 37
  • [33] Using a supply chain approach to guide R&D
    Hofman, P. J.
    Ledger, S. N.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IMPROVING THE PERFORMANCE OF SUPPLY CHAINS IN THE TRANSITIONAL ECONOMIES, 2006, (699): : 219 - +
  • [34] THE EFFECTS OF PUBLIC R&D SUBSIDIZED LOANS ON FIRMS' R&D OUTPUTS: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
    Gao, Yuchen
    Zhang, Si
    Hu, Yimei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 22 (06) : 1655 - 1678
  • [35] Indigenous R&D, Technology Imports and Energy Consumption Intensity: Evidence from Industrial Sectors in China
    Teng, Yuhua
    [J]. 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT, AND MATERIALS, PT C, 2012, 16 : 2019 - 2026
  • [36] R&D Intensity and Financing Decisions: Evidence from European Firms
    Elkemali, Taoufik
    Ben Rejeb, Aymen
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2015, 35 (02): : 1042 - 1055
  • [37] UK evidence for the determinants of R&D intensity from a panel fsQCA
    Guedes, Maria Joao
    Goncalves, Vitor da Conceicao
    Soares, Nuno
    Valente, Marieta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (11) : 5431 - 5436
  • [38] R&D capitalization and audit fees: Evidence from China
    Cheng, Jia-Chi
    Lu, Chia-Chi
    Kuo, Nan-Ting
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ACCOUNTING, 2016, 35 : 39 - 48
  • [39] R&D Investments and Firm Value: Evidence from China
    Kim, Woo Sung
    Park, Kunsu
    Lee, Sang Hoon
    Kim, Hongyoung
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (11):
  • [40] R&D expenditure and managerial ownership: evidence from firms of high-vs-low R&D intensity
    Hassanein, Ahmed
    Al-Khasawneh, Jamal Ali
    Elzahar, Hany
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2023, 21 (03) : 654 - 672