Does R&D intensity promote the adoption of circular supply chain management? Evidence from China

被引:22
|
作者
Chen, Xiaohong [1 ]
Chen, Lujie [2 ]
Jiang, Mengqi [2 ]
Yan, Ji [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Technol & Business, Changsha 410205, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Int Business Sch Suzhou, 8 Chongwen Rd, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Durham, Ctr Innovat & Technol Management, Business Sch, Durham DH1 3LB, England
关键词
CSCM; Circular economy; Innovation; Institutional theory; WASTE-TO-ENERGY; FIRM ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; MODERATING ROLE; INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES; DEVELOPMENT SPILLOVERS; INNOVATION ACTIVITIES; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; STATE OWNERSHIP; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.10.015
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the relationship between research and development (R&D) intensity and circular supply chain management (CSCM) adoption of high-tech manufacturing companies in China to deepen our understanding of how to improve CSCM adoption in emerging economies. In particular, we examine the moderating effect of three kinds of institutional pressures (i.e., regulatory pressure from governmental regulations, mimetic pressure from industry competition, and normative pressure from overseas customer demand) from the perspective of institutional theory. Based on the panel data of 310 Chinese listed companies from 2006 to 2019, we find that R&D intensity positively affects firms' CSCM adoption. We further observe that this positive effect is strengthened when the ratio of state-owned shares or the degree of industry competition is higher. However, overseas operating income does not affect the impact of R&D intensity on CSCM adoption. Our study contributes to the literature on the innovation - circular economy debate, confirming the positive effect of R&D intensity on firms' CSCM adoption, and provides insights into moderating effects on this relationship in an emerging economy context.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 166
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Financial constraints, R&D investment and uncertainty: new evidence from the Italian automotive supply chain
    Calabrese, G. G.
    Falavigna, G.
    Ippoliti, R.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2023,
  • [22] How does R&D intensity influence firm explorativeness? Evidence of R&D active firms in four advanced countries
    Lee, Cheng-Yu
    Wu, Hsueh-Liang
    Pao, Huei-Wen
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2014, 34 (10) : 582 - 593
  • [23] Does R&D intensity influence leverage? Evidence from Indian firm-level data
    Saibal Ghosh
    [J]. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2012, 10 (2) : 158 - 175
  • [24] Does Environmental Regulation Repress the International R&D Spillover Effect? Evidence from China
    Liu, Chengliang
    Wang, Tao
    Guo, Qingbin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (16)
  • [25] How does multidimensional R&D investment affect green innovation? Evidence from China
    Shi, Yang
    Yang, Can
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [26] Does R&D intensity influence leverage? Evidence from Indian firm-level data
    Ghosh, Saibal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2012, 10 (02) : 158 - 175
  • [27] Does the annual report readability improve corporate R&D investment? Evidence from China
    Du, Ya-Guang
    Li, Shu
    Kuo, Nan-Ting
    Li, Dan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISCLOSURE AND GOVERNANCE, 2024,
  • [28] How does leverage affect R&D intensity and how does R&D intensity impact on firm value in South Korea?
    Min, Byung S.
    Smyth, Russell
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2016, 48 (58) : 5667 - 5675
  • [29] Management for R&D in Pharmaceutical Supply Chains
    Huang Yin
    Li Xiamiao
    Liu Dapeng
    [J]. MOT2009: PROCEEDINGS OF ZHENGZHOU CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 638 - 644
  • [30] China reworks R&D management
    Brainard, Jeffrey
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2023, 379 (6637)