Does R&D intensity promote the adoption of circular supply chain management? Evidence from China

被引:22
|
作者
Chen, Xiaohong [1 ]
Chen, Lujie [2 ]
Jiang, Mengqi [2 ]
Yan, Ji [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Technol & Business, Changsha 410205, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Int Business Sch Suzhou, 8 Chongwen Rd, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Durham, Ctr Innovat & Technol Management, Business Sch, Durham DH1 3LB, England
关键词
CSCM; Circular economy; Innovation; Institutional theory; WASTE-TO-ENERGY; FIRM ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; MODERATING ROLE; INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES; DEVELOPMENT SPILLOVERS; INNOVATION ACTIVITIES; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; STATE OWNERSHIP; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.10.015
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the relationship between research and development (R&D) intensity and circular supply chain management (CSCM) adoption of high-tech manufacturing companies in China to deepen our understanding of how to improve CSCM adoption in emerging economies. In particular, we examine the moderating effect of three kinds of institutional pressures (i.e., regulatory pressure from governmental regulations, mimetic pressure from industry competition, and normative pressure from overseas customer demand) from the perspective of institutional theory. Based on the panel data of 310 Chinese listed companies from 2006 to 2019, we find that R&D intensity positively affects firms' CSCM adoption. We further observe that this positive effect is strengthened when the ratio of state-owned shares or the degree of industry competition is higher. However, overseas operating income does not affect the impact of R&D intensity on CSCM adoption. Our study contributes to the literature on the innovation - circular economy debate, confirming the positive effect of R&D intensity on firms' CSCM adoption, and provides insights into moderating effects on this relationship in an emerging economy context.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 166
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does supply chain concentration promote or inhibit corporate R&D investment?
    Zhao, Shukuan
    Fan, Xueyuan
    Shao, Dong
    Wang, Shuang
    [J]. CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2024,
  • [2] Robot adoption and enterprise R&D manipulation: Evidence from China
    Zhou, Zhongsheng
    Li, Zhuo
    Du, Shanzhong
    Cao, June
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2024, 200
  • [3] Does digital transformation promote supply chain efficiency? Evidence from China
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Chi, Guodong
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [4] Does anti-corruption campaign promote corporate R&D investment? Evidence from China
    Gan Weiyu
    Xu Xixiong
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 30 : 292 - 296
  • [5] Can R&D Intensity Reduce Carbon Emissions Intensity? Evidence from China
    Zhao, Yan
    Sun, Hui
    Xia, Xuechao
    Ma, Dianyuan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [6] Does an oil boom promote firms' R&D expenditure? Evidence from Ecuador
    Grijalva, Diego F.
    Ponsetto, Mary Lou
    Ponton, Yelitza
    [J]. MANAGEMENT RESEARCH-THE JOURNAL OF THE IBEROAMERICAN ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 18 (02) : 171 - 199
  • [7] Does financialization affect firm' R&D investment? Evidence from China
    Liu, Li
    He, Jun
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 58
  • [8] Does state ownership affect R&D investments? Evidence from China
    Azzam, Ala'a
    Alhababsah, Salem
    [J]. COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [9] R&D Intensity and Auditor Choice: Evidence from China's Capital Markets
    Chen Shenglan
    [J]. STATISTIC APPLICATION IN SCIENTIFIC AND SOCIAL REFORMATION, 2010, : 853 - 861
  • [10] The impacts of family involvement on R&D investment intensity in firms: Evidence from China
    Wang, Minglin
    Xu, Mengna
    He, Qiuqin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2022, 18 (01) : 277 - 294