Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the spiritual health scale

被引:1
|
作者
Cao, Meijuan [1 ]
Zou, Liyan [1 ]
Zhao, Binyu [1 ]
Qiu, Yijia [1 ]
Liu, Huiping [1 ]
Wei, Guofang [2 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Sch Nursing, 2318 Yuhang Tang Lane, Hangzhou 311100, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Vocat & Tech Coll, Sch Nursing, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Nursing; spiritual health; assessment tool; CARE;
D O I
10.21037/apm-22-188
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In recent years, spiritual health became a focus of interest and nurses' spiritual health is crucial to the quality of their own lives and patients' health care. In China, high workloads, tense nurse-patient relationships, and low social status have been found to have negative impacts on the work attitude and nursing quality and spiritual health offers direction for solving this problem. This study assessed the spiritual health levels of nurses on the Chinese mainland using a revised Chinese version of the spiritual health scale (SHS-C). Methods: A total of 747 nurses were recruited in Zhejiang Province, China. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the revised SHS-C were performed using convenience sampling, with 291 and 456 nurses used for each analysis type, respectively. Items on the SHS-C were screened using the discrete trend method, the extreme group approach, correlation analysis, and EFA to create a revised mental health questionnaire for nurses. An internal consistency test and CFA were then performed to verify the spiritual health questionnaire for nurses. A self-reporting questionnaire consisting of demographic questions and the revised SHS-C items was used for this cross-sectional correlation study. Results: The revised SHS-C included 6 subscales comprising alpha total of 28 items. Cronbach's a and retest reliability for the revised questionnaire were 0.90 and 0.73, respectively. The fit of the model was analyzed by CFA [chi(2)/df =1.79; goodness of fit index (GFI) =0.83; adjusted GFI (AGFI) =0.79; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) =0.06; normed fit index (NFI) =0.86; comparative fit index (CFI) =0.93; non-NFI (NNFI) =0.92; incremental fit index (IFI) =0.93; parsimony NFI (PNFI) =0.76; parsimony CFI (PCFI) =0.83; and parsimony GFI (PGFI) =0.69; with each index score higher than those of the 5-subscale SHS short form previously developed by Hsiao et al.]. A reliability test showed that the overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.93, with alpha Cronbach's a of between 0.82 and 0.92 for each section. This study developed and validated a revised SHS-C. Conclusions: Our research will help policymakers, administrators, nursing leaders, and educators to identify areas for improvement regarding nurses' spiritual health, which could translate into significant improvements in patients' health care.
引用
收藏
页码:1058 / 1067
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the stroke upper limb capacity scale
    Xia, Minqi
    Ye, Jingjing
    Dong, Yewen
    Yang, Lingdi
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2025,
  • [42] Validity and reliability of Chinese version of Spiegel scale in the population of Primary Insomnia
    Yu, Chang-He
    Yan, Shiyan
    Bai, Wen-Jing
    Liu, Yan
    Sun, Ya-Nan
    Zhang, Runshun
    Zhang, Yanhong
    Liu, Jia
    He, Li-Yun
    Liu, Bao-Yan
    Wang, Xi-you
    Liu, Chang-Xin
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (01) : 122 - 123
  • [43] Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale
    Yang, Qian-Qian
    Liu, Hua-Xia
    Yang, Chun-Ling
    Ji, Shu-Yu
    Li, Lei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2014, 1 (01) : 23 - 27
  • [44] An Adapted Chinese Version of Neck Pain and Disability Scale Validity and Reliability
    Chen, Ziqiang
    Zhao, Yingchuan
    Wang, ChuanFeng
    Li, Ming
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    SPINE, 2011, 36 (20) : E1322 - E1327
  • [45] A Chinese Version of the Meaning in Caregiving Scale: An Assessment of Its Reliability and Validity
    Yen, Wen-Jiuan
    Huang, Xuan-Yi
    Ma, Wei-Fen
    Lee, Sheuan
    Lee, Chiu-Hsiang
    PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2009, 45 (02) : 140 - 150
  • [46] The Chinese version of personal and social performance scale (PSP): Validity and reliability
    Si, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 11 : 167 - 168
  • [47] The Chinese version of attitudes towards guidelines scale: validity and reliability assessment
    Yan, Wen
    Chen, Qian
    Zhang, Xuemei
    Elovainio, Marko
    Huang, Yan
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [48] Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale
    Hou, Wen-Hsuan
    Yeh, Tian-Shin
    Liang, Huey-Wen
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 113 (05) : 313 - 320
  • [49] Reliability and validity validation of the Chinese version of the family vitiligo impact scale
    Sun, Jian
    Li, Linna
    Tian, Xue
    Fu, Yuping
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [50] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the COVID-19 Phobia Scale
    Xie, Yuntian
    Arpaci, Ibrahim
    Xiao, Yahui
    Meng, Fanfei
    Xie, Ruotong
    BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 10 (01)