Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the spiritual health scale

被引:1
|
作者
Cao, Meijuan [1 ]
Zou, Liyan [1 ]
Zhao, Binyu [1 ]
Qiu, Yijia [1 ]
Liu, Huiping [1 ]
Wei, Guofang [2 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Sch Nursing, 2318 Yuhang Tang Lane, Hangzhou 311100, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Vocat & Tech Coll, Sch Nursing, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Nursing; spiritual health; assessment tool; CARE;
D O I
10.21037/apm-22-188
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In recent years, spiritual health became a focus of interest and nurses' spiritual health is crucial to the quality of their own lives and patients' health care. In China, high workloads, tense nurse-patient relationships, and low social status have been found to have negative impacts on the work attitude and nursing quality and spiritual health offers direction for solving this problem. This study assessed the spiritual health levels of nurses on the Chinese mainland using a revised Chinese version of the spiritual health scale (SHS-C). Methods: A total of 747 nurses were recruited in Zhejiang Province, China. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the revised SHS-C were performed using convenience sampling, with 291 and 456 nurses used for each analysis type, respectively. Items on the SHS-C were screened using the discrete trend method, the extreme group approach, correlation analysis, and EFA to create a revised mental health questionnaire for nurses. An internal consistency test and CFA were then performed to verify the spiritual health questionnaire for nurses. A self-reporting questionnaire consisting of demographic questions and the revised SHS-C items was used for this cross-sectional correlation study. Results: The revised SHS-C included 6 subscales comprising alpha total of 28 items. Cronbach's a and retest reliability for the revised questionnaire were 0.90 and 0.73, respectively. The fit of the model was analyzed by CFA [chi(2)/df =1.79; goodness of fit index (GFI) =0.83; adjusted GFI (AGFI) =0.79; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) =0.06; normed fit index (NFI) =0.86; comparative fit index (CFI) =0.93; non-NFI (NNFI) =0.92; incremental fit index (IFI) =0.93; parsimony NFI (PNFI) =0.76; parsimony CFI (PCFI) =0.83; and parsimony GFI (PGFI) =0.69; with each index score higher than those of the 5-subscale SHS short form previously developed by Hsiao et al.]. A reliability test showed that the overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.93, with alpha Cronbach's a of between 0.82 and 0.92 for each section. This study developed and validated a revised SHS-C. Conclusions: Our research will help policymakers, administrators, nursing leaders, and educators to identify areas for improvement regarding nurses' spiritual health, which could translate into significant improvements in patients' health care.
引用
收藏
页码:1058 / 1067
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the nurse spiritual care therapeutics scale (NSCTS)
    Merati-Fashi, Fatemeh
    Khaledi-Paveh, Behnam
    Mosafer, Hadis
    Ebadi, Abbas
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [32] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of adult disorganized attachment scale in Chinese adults
    Li, Angyang
    Wang, Shuo
    Paetzold, Ramona L.
    Liu, Xiangping
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (09) : 7618 - 7628
  • [33] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of adult disorganized attachment scale in Chinese adults
    Angyang Li
    Shuo Wang
    Ramona L. Paetzold
    Xiangping Liu
    Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 7618 - 7628
  • [34] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of traumatic childbirth perception scale in Chinese women
    Caifeng Chen
    Xiaoying Wang
    Han Xu
    Xuejie Liu
    Yuhong Li
    Current Psychology, 2024, 43 : 7205 - 7216
  • [35] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of traumatic childbirth perception scale in Chinese women
    Chen, Caifeng
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Xu, Han
    Liu, Xuejie
    Li, Yuhong
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 43 (08) : 7205 - 7216
  • [36] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF HEALTH PROTECTIVE BEHAVIOR SCALE
    Odek, Omer
    Savas, Mumin
    Zincir, Handan
    JOURNAL OF BASIC AND CLINICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 6 (01): : 95 - 104
  • [37] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Environmental Health Literacy Scale
    Gundogdu, Nurcan Akguel
    Tosun, Alime Selcuk
    Gunal, Buesra Dagci
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2025, 31 (01)
  • [38] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the COVID-19 Phobia Scale
    Yuntian Xie
    Ibrahim Arpaci
    Yahui Xiao
    Fanfei Meng
    Ruotong Xie
    BMC Psychology, 10
  • [39] The Chinese version of the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP): Validity and reliability
    Si Tianmei
    Shu Liang
    Su Yun'ai
    Tian Chenghua
    Yan Jun
    Cheng Jia
    Li Xueni
    Liu Qi
    Ma Yantao
    Zhang Weihua
    Zhang Hongyan
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2011, 185 (1-2) : 275 - 279
  • [40] The Chinese version of the facts on aging quiz scale: Reliability and validity assessment
    Wang, Cheng-Ching
    Liao, Wen-Chun
    Kuo, Pi-Chao
    Yuan, Su-Chuan
    Chuang, Hsiao-Ling
    Lo, Hao-Chang
    Liao, Hui-Yen
    Elaine, Miller
    Lee, Meng-Chih
    Yen, Chi-Hua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2010, 47 (06) : 742 - 752