Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the spiritual health scale

被引:1
|
作者
Cao, Meijuan [1 ]
Zou, Liyan [1 ]
Zhao, Binyu [1 ]
Qiu, Yijia [1 ]
Liu, Huiping [1 ]
Wei, Guofang [2 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Sch Nursing, 2318 Yuhang Tang Lane, Hangzhou 311100, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Vocat & Tech Coll, Sch Nursing, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Nursing; spiritual health; assessment tool; CARE;
D O I
10.21037/apm-22-188
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In recent years, spiritual health became a focus of interest and nurses' spiritual health is crucial to the quality of their own lives and patients' health care. In China, high workloads, tense nurse-patient relationships, and low social status have been found to have negative impacts on the work attitude and nursing quality and spiritual health offers direction for solving this problem. This study assessed the spiritual health levels of nurses on the Chinese mainland using a revised Chinese version of the spiritual health scale (SHS-C). Methods: A total of 747 nurses were recruited in Zhejiang Province, China. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the revised SHS-C were performed using convenience sampling, with 291 and 456 nurses used for each analysis type, respectively. Items on the SHS-C were screened using the discrete trend method, the extreme group approach, correlation analysis, and EFA to create a revised mental health questionnaire for nurses. An internal consistency test and CFA were then performed to verify the spiritual health questionnaire for nurses. A self-reporting questionnaire consisting of demographic questions and the revised SHS-C items was used for this cross-sectional correlation study. Results: The revised SHS-C included 6 subscales comprising alpha total of 28 items. Cronbach's a and retest reliability for the revised questionnaire were 0.90 and 0.73, respectively. The fit of the model was analyzed by CFA [chi(2)/df =1.79; goodness of fit index (GFI) =0.83; adjusted GFI (AGFI) =0.79; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) =0.06; normed fit index (NFI) =0.86; comparative fit index (CFI) =0.93; non-NFI (NNFI) =0.92; incremental fit index (IFI) =0.93; parsimony NFI (PNFI) =0.76; parsimony CFI (PCFI) =0.83; and parsimony GFI (PGFI) =0.69; with each index score higher than those of the 5-subscale SHS short form previously developed by Hsiao et al.]. A reliability test showed that the overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.93, with alpha Cronbach's a of between 0.82 and 0.92 for each section. This study developed and validated a revised SHS-C. Conclusions: Our research will help policymakers, administrators, nursing leaders, and educators to identify areas for improvement regarding nurses' spiritual health, which could translate into significant improvements in patients' health care.
引用
收藏
页码:1058 / 1067
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of a short form of the family health scale
    Fei Wang
    Yunchou Wu
    Xiaonan Sun
    Dong Wang
    Wai-Kit Ming
    Xinying Sun
    Yibo Wu
    [J]. BMC Primary Care, 23
  • [2] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of a short form of the family health scale
    Wang, Fei
    Wu, Yunchou
    Sun, Xiaonan
    Wang, Dong
    Ming, Wai-Kit
    Sun, Xinying
    Wu, Yibo
    [J]. BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2022, 23 (01):
  • [3] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Worry Scale
    Shiu, ATY
    Wong, RYM
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2004, 21 (03) : 257 - 265
  • [4] Validity and Reliability of Korean Version of the Spiritual Care Competence Scale
    Chung, Mi Ja
    Park, Youngrye
    Eun, Young
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN ACADEMY OF NURSING, 2016, 46 (06) : 871 - 880
  • [5] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the epilepsy stigma scale
    Huang, Kailing
    Wu, Yuanxia
    He, Qiang
    Yang, Haojun
    Du, Yangsa
    Xiao, Bo
    Feng, Li
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2022, 127
  • [6] Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of Digital Hoarding Scale
    Mu, Wenlong
    Cui, Shiyang
    Deng, FengFeng
    Liu, Tianyuan
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2024,
  • [7] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Health Literacy Scale Short-Form in the Chinese population
    Xiaonan Sun
    Ke Lv
    Fei Wang
    Pu Ge
    Yuyao Niu
    Wenli Yu
    Xinying Sun
    Wai-Kit Ming
    Miao He
    Yibo Wu
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 23
  • [8] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Health Literacy Scale Short-Form in the Chinese population
    Sun, Xiaonan
    Lv, Ke
    Wang, Fei
    Ge, Pu
    Niu, Yuyao
    Yu, Wenli
    Sun, Xinying
    Ming, Wai-Kit
    He, Miao
    Wu, Yibo
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [9] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Nurse Spiritual Care Therapeutics Scale
    Aslan, Hakime
    Akturk, Ummuhan
    Erci, Behice
    [J]. PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2020, 18 (06) : 707 - 712
  • [10] Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of Robot Anxiety Scale in Chinese Adults
    Cai, Jie
    Sun, Yuxuan
    Niu, Chunling
    Qi, Wei
    Fu, Xurong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2024, 40 (13) : 3355 - 3364