On shared gamma-frailty conditional Markov model for semicompeting risks data

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Jing [1 ]
Zhang, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Bakoyannis, Giorgos [1 ]
Gao, Sujuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Richard M Fairbanks Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
dementia; EM-algorithm; frailty; illness-death model; Markov model; nonparametric; semicompeting risks; INTERVAL-CENSORED OBSERVATIONS; ILLNESS-DEATH PROCESS; NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION; MULTISTATE MODELS; AFRICAN-AMERICANS; SURVIVAL-DATA; SEMIPARAMETRIC ANALYSIS; ALZHEIMER-DISEASE; DEMENTIA; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1002/sim.8590
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Semicompeting risks data are a mixture of competing risks data and progressive state data. This type of data occurs when a nonterminal event is subject to truncation by a well-defined terminal event, but not vice versa. The shared gamma-frailty conditional Markov model (GFCMM) has been used to analyze semicompeting risks data because of its flexibility. There are two versions of this model: the restricted and the unrestricted model. Maximum likelihood estimation methodology has been proposed in the literature. However, we found through numerical experiments that the unrestricted model sometimes yields nonparametrically biased estimation. In this article, we provide a practical guideline for using the GFCMM in the analysis of semicompeting risk data that includes: (a) a score test to assess if the restricted model, which does not exhibit estimation problems, is reasonable under a proportional hazards assumption, and (b) a graphical illustration to justify whether the unrestricted model yields nonparametric estimation with substantial bias for cases where the test provides a statistical significant result against the restricted model. This guideline was applied to the Indianapolis-Ibadan Dementia Project data as an illustration to explore how dementia occurrence changes mortality risk.
引用
收藏
页码:3042 / 3058
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The correlated and shared gamma frailty model for bivariate current status data: An illustration for cross-sectional serological data
    Hens, N.
    Wienke, A.
    Aerts, M.
    Molenberghs, G.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (22) : 2785 - 2800
  • [22] A Mixture Shared Gamma Frailty Model Under Gompertz Baseline Distribution
    Pandey, Arvind
    Bhushan, Shashi
    Ralte, Lalpawimawha
    JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY FOR PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS, 2020, 21 (01) : 187 - 200
  • [23] A Mixture Shared Gamma Frailty Model Under Gompertz Baseline Distribution
    Arvind Pandey
    Shashi Bhushan
    Lalpawimawha Ralte
    Journal of the Indian Society for Probability and Statistics, 2020, 21 : 187 - 200
  • [24] A Joint Frailty Model for Competing Risks Survival Data
    Ha, Il Do
    Cho, Geon-Ho
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2015, 28 (06) : 1209 - 1216
  • [25] The Generalized Gamma Shared Frailty Model under Different Baseline Distributions
    Sidhu, Sukhmani
    Jain, Kanchan
    Sharma, Suresh K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2019, 4 (01) : 219 - 231
  • [26] A class of Bayesian shared gamma frailty models with multivariate failure time data
    Yin, GS
    Ibrahim, JG
    BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (01) : 208 - 216
  • [27] Shared frailty model for recurrent event data with multiple causes
    Sankaran, P. G.
    Anisha, P.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2011, 38 (12) : 2859 - 2868
  • [28] ANALYSIS OF BIVARIATE SURVIVAL DATA USING SHARED ADDITIVE HAZARD GAMMA FRAILTY MODELS
    Pandey, Arvind
    Lalpawimawha
    Misra, Praveen Kumar
    Lalawmpuii, R.
    JORDAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS, 2019, 12 (03): : 329 - 350
  • [29] The Shared Weighted Lindley Frailty Model for Clustered Failure Time Data
    Gallardo, Diego I.
    Bourguignon, Marcelo
    Santibanez, John L.
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2025, 67 (02)
  • [30] A serially correlated gamma frailty model for longitudinal count data
    Henderson, R
    Shimakura, S
    BIOMETRIKA, 2003, 90 (02) : 355 - 366