Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial

被引:15
|
作者
Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rivero-Santana, Amado [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Torres-Castano, Alezandra [4 ]
Ramos-Garcia, Vanesa [4 ]
Alvarez-Perez, Yolanda [4 ]
Gonzalez-Hernandez, Nerea [2 ,5 ]
Buron, Andrea [2 ,6 ]
Pignone, Michael [7 ]
Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Canary Isl Hlth Serv SESCS, Evaluat Unit, S-N 38109 El Rosario, Tenerife, Spain
[2] Hlth Serv Res Chron Patients Network REDISSEC, Tenerife, Spain
[3] Ctr Biomed Res Canary Isl CIBICAN, Tenerife, Spain
[4] Canary Isl Fdn Hlth Res FUNCANIS, Tenerife, Spain
[5] Hosp Galdakao Usansolo, Res Unit, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
[6] Hosp Mar, Epidemiol & Evaluat Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Univ Texas Austin, Dell Med Sch, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Colorectal cancer screening; Decision aid; Patient involvement; Primary care; Randomized controlled trial; Shared decision-making; Spain; PREDICTORS; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-019-0739-6
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) screening has shown to reduce incidence and mortality rates, and therefore is widely recommended for people above 50years-old. However, despite the implementation of population-based screening programs in several countries, uptake rates are still low. Decision aids (DAs) may help patients to make informed decisions about CRC screening.MethodsWe performed a randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a DA developed to promote CRC screening, with patients from two primary care centers in Spain who never had underwent CRC screening. Contrary to center B (n=24), Center A (n=83) attended patients from an area where the population-based screening program was not implemented at that moment. Outcome measures were decisional conflict, knowledge of the disease and available screening options, intention to uptake the test, and concordance between patients' goals/concerns and intention.ResultsIn center A, there were significant differences favoring the DA in decisional conflict (p<0.001) and knowledge (p<0.001). The absolute differences favoring DA group in intention to undergo fecal occult blood test (10.5%) and colonoscopy (13.7%) were significant only before correction for attenuation. In center B the differences were significant only for knowledge (p<0.001). Patients' goals and concerns regarding the screening did not significantly predict their intention, and therefore we could not calculate a measure of concordance between the two constructs.ConclusionsA DA improved the decisional process of participants who had never been invited to participate in the Spanish public CRC screening program, replicating previous results in this field. Future research is needed to identify subgroups that could benefit more from these interventions.Trial registrationInternational Standard Registered Clinical/social Study Number: ISRCTN98108615 (Retrospectively registered on 27 December 2018).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Based on Predicted Risk: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Plys, Ekaterina
    Bulliard, Jean-Luc
    Chaouch, Aziz
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    Duuren, Luuk A. van
    Braendle, Karen
    Auer, Reto
    Froehlich, Florian
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Corley, Douglas A.
    Selby, Kevin
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [42] Cost Effectiveness of Mailed Outreach Programs for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Analysis of a Pragmatic, Randomized Trial
    Kapinos, Kandice A.
    Halm, Ethan A.
    Murphy, Caitlin C.
    Santini, Noel O.
    Loewen, Adam C.
    Skinner, Celette Sugg
    Singal, Amit G.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 20 (10) : 2383 - +
  • [43] Long-term effectiveness of endoscopic screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: A randomized trial
    Thiis-Evensen, Espen
    Kalager, Mette
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Hoff, Geir
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 1 (03) : 162 - 168
  • [44] RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF COMPLIANCE WITH SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL-CANCER
    NICHOLS, S
    KOCH, E
    LALLEMAND, RC
    HEALD, RJ
    IZZARD, L
    MACHIN, D
    MULLEE, MA
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 293 (6539): : 107 - 110
  • [45] Effectiveness of the extended parallel process model in promoting colorectal cancer screening
    Birmingham, Wendy C.
    Hung, Man
    Boonyasiriwat, Watcharaporn
    Kohlmann, Wendy
    Walters, Scott T.
    Burt, Randall W.
    Stroup, Antoinette M.
    Edwards, Sandie L.
    Schwartz, Marc D.
    Lowery, Jan T.
    Hill, Deirdre A.
    Wiggins, Charles L.
    Higginbotham, John C.
    Tang, Philip
    Hon, Shirley D.
    Franklin, Jeremy D.
    Vernon, Sally
    Kinney, Anita Y.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 (10) : 1265 - 1278
  • [46] PROMOTING CANCER SCREENING - A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF 3 INTERVENTIONS
    MCPHEE, SJ
    BIRD, JA
    JENKINS, CNH
    FORDHAM, D
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 149 (08) : 1866 - 1872
  • [47] A targeted decision aid for the elderly to decide whether to undergo colorectal cancer screening: development and results of an uncontrolled trial
    Carmen L Lewis
    Carol E Golin
    Chris DeLeon
    Jennifer M Griffith
    Jena Ivey
    Lyndal Trevena
    Michael Pignone
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10
  • [48] A targeted decision aid for the elderly to decide whether to undergo colorectal cancer screening: development and results of an uncontrolled trial
    Lewis, Carmen L.
    Golin, Carol E.
    DeLeon, Chris
    Griffith, Jennifer M.
    Ivey, Jena
    Trevena, Lyndal
    Pignone, Michael
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2010, 10
  • [49] Use of a Computerized Decision Aid for Developmental Surveillance and Screening A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Carroll, Aaron E.
    Bauer, Nerissa S.
    Dugan, Tamara M.
    Anand, Vibha
    Saha, Chandan
    Downs, Stephen M.
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2014, 168 (09) : 815 - 821
  • [50] Use of a novel computerized decision aid for aneuploidy screening: a randomized controlled trial
    Carlson, Laura M.
    Harris, Sarah
    Hardisty, Emily E.
    Hocutt, Ginger
    Vargo, Diane
    Campbell, Erin
    Davis, Elysia
    Gilmore, Kelly
    Vora, Neeta L.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 21 (04) : 923 - 929