Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial

被引:15
|
作者
Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rivero-Santana, Amado [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Torres-Castano, Alezandra [4 ]
Ramos-Garcia, Vanesa [4 ]
Alvarez-Perez, Yolanda [4 ]
Gonzalez-Hernandez, Nerea [2 ,5 ]
Buron, Andrea [2 ,6 ]
Pignone, Michael [7 ]
Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Canary Isl Hlth Serv SESCS, Evaluat Unit, S-N 38109 El Rosario, Tenerife, Spain
[2] Hlth Serv Res Chron Patients Network REDISSEC, Tenerife, Spain
[3] Ctr Biomed Res Canary Isl CIBICAN, Tenerife, Spain
[4] Canary Isl Fdn Hlth Res FUNCANIS, Tenerife, Spain
[5] Hosp Galdakao Usansolo, Res Unit, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
[6] Hosp Mar, Epidemiol & Evaluat Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Univ Texas Austin, Dell Med Sch, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Colorectal cancer screening; Decision aid; Patient involvement; Primary care; Randomized controlled trial; Shared decision-making; Spain; PREDICTORS; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-019-0739-6
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) screening has shown to reduce incidence and mortality rates, and therefore is widely recommended for people above 50years-old. However, despite the implementation of population-based screening programs in several countries, uptake rates are still low. Decision aids (DAs) may help patients to make informed decisions about CRC screening.MethodsWe performed a randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a DA developed to promote CRC screening, with patients from two primary care centers in Spain who never had underwent CRC screening. Contrary to center B (n=24), Center A (n=83) attended patients from an area where the population-based screening program was not implemented at that moment. Outcome measures were decisional conflict, knowledge of the disease and available screening options, intention to uptake the test, and concordance between patients' goals/concerns and intention.ResultsIn center A, there were significant differences favoring the DA in decisional conflict (p<0.001) and knowledge (p<0.001). The absolute differences favoring DA group in intention to undergo fecal occult blood test (10.5%) and colonoscopy (13.7%) were significant only before correction for attenuation. In center B the differences were significant only for knowledge (p<0.001). Patients' goals and concerns regarding the screening did not significantly predict their intention, and therefore we could not calculate a measure of concordance between the two constructs.ConclusionsA DA improved the decisional process of participants who had never been invited to participate in the Spanish public CRC screening program, replicating previous results in this field. Future research is needed to identify subgroups that could benefit more from these interventions.Trial registrationInternational Standard Registered Clinical/social Study Number: ISRCTN98108615 (Retrospectively registered on 27 December 2018).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Online Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Aid for At-Risk Men: A Randomized Trial
    Watts, Kaaren J.
    Meiser, Bettina
    Wakefield, Claire E.
    Barratt, Alexandra L.
    Howard, Kirsten
    Cheah, Benjamin C.
    Mann, Graham J.
    Lobb, Elizabeth A.
    Gaff, Clara L.
    Patel, Manish I.
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 33 (09) : 986 - 997
  • [22] Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening - A randomized, controlled trial
    Pignone, M
    Harris, R
    Kinsinger, L
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 133 (10) : 761 - 769
  • [23] A Multisite Randomized Trial of a Veteran-Centric Lung Cancer Screening Decision Aid
    Schapira, Marilyn M.
    Rebecca, Hubbard
    Jeffrey, Whittle
    Vachani, Anil
    Akers, Sdott
    Schrand, Susan
    Kaminstein, Dana
    Bastian, Lori A.
    Kravetz, Jeffrey D.
    Rodriguez, Keri L.
    Asan, Onur
    Chhatre, Sumedha
    Prigge, Jason
    Meline, Jessica
    Dye, Deborah
    Reider, Julie
    Ibarra, Jennifer V.
    Corn, Barbara
    Frempong, Jemimah
    Fraenkel, Liana
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2024, 44 (02) : NP11 - NP12
  • [24] A decision aid versus shared decision making for prostate cancer screening results of a randomized, controlled trial
    Stamm, Andrew W.
    Banerji, John S.
    Wolff, Erika M.
    Slee, April
    Akapame, Sydney
    Dahl, Kathryn
    Massman, John D., III
    Soung, Michael C.
    Pittenger, Kim R.
    Corman, John M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (04) : 8910 - 8917
  • [25] Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Older Adults A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Dalton, Alexandra F.
    Golin, Carol E.
    Morris, Carolyn
    Kistler, Christine E.
    Dolor, Rowena J.
    Bertin, Kaitlyn B.
    Suresh, Krithika
    Patel, Swati G.
    Lewis, Carmen L.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (12) : e2244982
  • [26] A randomized trial of a decision aid for breast cancer surgery
    Goel, V
    Sawka, C
    Thiel, E
    Gort, E
    O'Connor, A
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (04) : 482 - 482
  • [27] Risk Stratification and Shared Decision Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Schroy, Paul C., III
    Duhovic, Emir
    Chen, Clara A.
    Heeren, Timothy C.
    Lopez, William
    Apodaca, Danielle L.
    Wong, John B.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2016, 36 (04) : 526 - 535
  • [28] OUTCOMES OF COMPUTERIZED DECISION AID USE IN COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING
    Fernandez, Norma P.
    Jolly, Kevin W.
    Morera, Osvaldo F.
    Urquidi, Ulysses
    Kim, Leroy
    Dolan, James G.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2007, 33 : S213 - S213
  • [29] Supporting Treatment Decision Making in Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Trial of a Decision Aid for Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Considering Chemotherapy
    Leighl, Natasha B.
    Shepherd, Heather L.
    Butow, Phyllis N.
    Clarke, Stephen J.
    McJannett, Margaret
    Beale, Philip J.
    Wilcken, Nicholas R. C.
    Moore, Malcolm J.
    Chen, Eric X.
    Goldstein, David
    Horvath, Lisa
    Knox, Jennifer J.
    Krzyzanowska, Monika
    Oza, Amit M.
    Feld, Ronald
    Hedley, David
    Xu, Wei
    Tattersall, Martin H. N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15) : 2077 - 2084
  • [30] The LEAD trial - the effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Pernille Gabel
    Mette Bach Larsen
    Pia Kirkegaard
    Adrian Edwards
    Berit Andersen
    Trials, 19