Effects of institutional history and leniency on collusive corruption and tax evasion

被引:12
|
作者
Buckenmaier, Johannes [1 ]
Dimant, Eugen [2 ,3 ]
Mittone, Luigi [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Econ, Blumlisalpstr 10, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Penn, Behav Eth Lab, 249 South 36th St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Nottingham, Ctr Decis Res & Expt Econ CeDEx, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[4] Univ Trento, Dept Econ, Cognit & Expt Econ Lab, ViaInama 5, I-38122 Trento, Italy
关键词
Collusive bribery; Institutions; Tax compliance; Leniency; Spillover; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; BRIBERY; AVERSION; WHISTLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2018.04.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate the effects of an institutional mechanism that incentivizes taxpayers to blow the whistle on collusive corruption and tax compliance. We explore this through a formal leniency program. In our experiment, we nest collusive corruption within a tax evasion framework. We not only study the effect of the presence of such a mechanism on behavior, but also the dynamic effect caused by the introduction and the removal of leniency. We find that in the presence of a leniency mechanism, subjects collude and accept bribes less often while paying more taxes, but there is no increase in bribe offers. Our results show that the introduction of the opportunity to blow the whistle decreases the collusion and bribe acceptance rate, and increases the collected tax yield. It also does not encourage bribe offers. In contrast, the removal of the institutional mechanism does not induce negative effects, suggesting a positive spillover effect of leniency that persists even after the mechanism has been removed. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 313
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing tax collection efficiency of G20 countries: an analysis of tax potential, tax evasion and anti-corruption efforts
    Alqalawi, Usama
    Alwaked, Ahmad
    Al Qudah, Anas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONEY LAUNDERING CONTROL, 2024, 27 (03): : 489 - 504
  • [42] Tax efforts and tax evasion-economic development Nexus. Does institutional quality matter?
    Amoh, John Kwaku
    Ofori-Boateng, Kenneth
    Nsor-Ambala, Randolph
    Bugri Anarfo, Ebenezer
    [J]. COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 11 (02):
  • [43] The introduction of anti-tax evasion legislation in Thailand: an institutional theoretical perspective
    Natpraypant, Vorakanlaya
    Arshed, Norin
    Power, David
    [J]. ACCOUNTING FORUM, 2024, 48 (01) : 121 - 147
  • [44] The ghost of institutions past: History as an obstacle to fighting tax evasion?
    Kamm, Aaron
    Koch, Christian
    Nikiforakis, Nikos
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 132
  • [45] Importing corruption culture from overseas: Evidence from corporate tax evasion in the United States
    DeBacker, Jason
    Heim, Bradley T.
    Anh Tran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 117 (01) : 122 - 138
  • [46] The Effects of a Shared Interest and Regret Salience on Tax Evasion
    Hageman, Amy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN TAXATION ASSOCIATION, 2015, 37 (02): : 137 - 140
  • [47] Redistribution through the income tax: The vertical and horizontal effects of noncompliance and tax evasion
    Bishop, JA
    Formby, JP
    Lambert, P
    [J]. PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW, 2000, 28 (04): : 335 - 350
  • [48] Does government institutional reform deter corporate tax evasion? Evidence from China
    Xu, Junbing
    Zhu, Minling
    Song, Shengying
    Wu, Yunxi
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [49] Tax evasion in transition:: Outcome of an institutional clash?: Testing Feige's conjecture in Albania
    Gërxhani, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 48 (04) : 729 - 745
  • [50] Corruption and Firm Tax Evasion in Transition Economies: Results from Censored Quantile Instrumental Variables Estimation
    Payne, James E.
    Saunoris, James W.
    [J]. ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2020, 48 (02) : 195 - 206