Effects of institutional history and leniency on collusive corruption and tax evasion

被引:12
|
作者
Buckenmaier, Johannes [1 ]
Dimant, Eugen [2 ,3 ]
Mittone, Luigi [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Econ, Blumlisalpstr 10, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Penn, Behav Eth Lab, 249 South 36th St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Nottingham, Ctr Decis Res & Expt Econ CeDEx, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[4] Univ Trento, Dept Econ, Cognit & Expt Econ Lab, ViaInama 5, I-38122 Trento, Italy
关键词
Collusive bribery; Institutions; Tax compliance; Leniency; Spillover; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; BRIBERY; AVERSION; WHISTLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2018.04.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate the effects of an institutional mechanism that incentivizes taxpayers to blow the whistle on collusive corruption and tax compliance. We explore this through a formal leniency program. In our experiment, we nest collusive corruption within a tax evasion framework. We not only study the effect of the presence of such a mechanism on behavior, but also the dynamic effect caused by the introduction and the removal of leniency. We find that in the presence of a leniency mechanism, subjects collude and accept bribes less often while paying more taxes, but there is no increase in bribe offers. Our results show that the introduction of the opportunity to blow the whistle decreases the collusion and bribe acceptance rate, and increases the collected tax yield. It also does not encourage bribe offers. In contrast, the removal of the institutional mechanism does not induce negative effects, suggesting a positive spillover effect of leniency that persists even after the mechanism has been removed. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 313
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perceptions of institutional quality and justification of tax evasion
    Forteza, Alvaro
    Noboa, Cecilia
    [J]. CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2019, 30 (04) : 367 - 382
  • [22] Perceptions of institutional quality and justification of tax evasion
    Alvaro Forteza
    Cecilia Noboa
    [J]. Constitutional Political Economy, 2019, 30 : 367 - 382
  • [23] Corruption, tax evasion, and seigniorage in a monetary endogenous growth model
    Marakbi, Reda
    Villieu, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMIC THEORY, 2020, 22 (06) : 2019 - 2050
  • [24] A cointegration analysis of tax evasion, corruption and entrepreneurship in OECD countries
    Khyareh, Mohsen Mohammadi
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2019, 32 (01): : 3627 - 3646
  • [25] Does corruption cause tax evasion? Evidence from an emerging economy
    Amoh, John Kwaku
    Ali-Nakyea, Abdallah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONEY LAUNDERING CONTROL, 2019, 22 (02): : 217 - 232
  • [26] CORRUPTION, TAX EVASION AND THE ROLE OF WAGE INCENTIVES WITH ENDOGENOUS MONITORING TECHNOLOGY
    Wadho, Waqar Ahmed
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2016, 54 (01) : 391 - 407
  • [27] Tax evasion; public and political corruption and international trade: a global perspective
    Kurauone, Ophias
    Kong, Yusheng
    Sun, Huaping
    Famba, Takuriramunashe
    Muzamhindo, Simbarashe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMIC POLICY, 2021, 13 (06) : 698 - 729
  • [28] Financial crime, corruption and tax evasion: a cross-country investigation
    Amara, Ines
    Khlif, Hichem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONEY LAUNDERING CONTROL, 2018, 21 (04): : 545 - 554
  • [29] Corruption and Effects on Tax Structure
    Giray, Filiz
    [J]. ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCES-SIYASAL BILGILER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2005, (32): : 111 - 137
  • [30] Issues, Challenges and Problems with Tax Evasion: The Institutional Factors Approach
    Palil, Molid Rizal
    Malek, Marlin Marissa
    Jaguli, Abdu Rahim
    [J]. GADJAH MADA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2016, 18 (02) : 187 - 206