Effects of institutional history and leniency on collusive corruption and tax evasion

被引:12
|
作者
Buckenmaier, Johannes [1 ]
Dimant, Eugen [2 ,3 ]
Mittone, Luigi [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Econ, Blumlisalpstr 10, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Penn, Behav Eth Lab, 249 South 36th St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Nottingham, Ctr Decis Res & Expt Econ CeDEx, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[4] Univ Trento, Dept Econ, Cognit & Expt Econ Lab, ViaInama 5, I-38122 Trento, Italy
关键词
Collusive bribery; Institutions; Tax compliance; Leniency; Spillover; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; BRIBERY; AVERSION; WHISTLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2018.04.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate the effects of an institutional mechanism that incentivizes taxpayers to blow the whistle on collusive corruption and tax compliance. We explore this through a formal leniency program. In our experiment, we nest collusive corruption within a tax evasion framework. We not only study the effect of the presence of such a mechanism on behavior, but also the dynamic effect caused by the introduction and the removal of leniency. We find that in the presence of a leniency mechanism, subjects collude and accept bribes less often while paying more taxes, but there is no increase in bribe offers. Our results show that the introduction of the opportunity to blow the whistle decreases the collusion and bribe acceptance rate, and increases the collected tax yield. It also does not encourage bribe offers. In contrast, the removal of the institutional mechanism does not induce negative effects, suggesting a positive spillover effect of leniency that persists even after the mechanism has been removed. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 313
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Collusive tax evasion and social norms
    Abraham, Martin
    Lorek, Kerstin
    Richter, Friedemann
    Wrede, Matthias
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2017, 24 (02) : 179 - 197
  • [2] Corruption and Tax Evasion in Croatia Institutional Settings and Practical Experiences
    Bejakovic, Predrag
    [J]. MIDDLE EAST LAW AND GOVERNANCE, 2014, 6 (02) : 141 - 165
  • [3] Tax Evasion, Corruption and Tax Loopholes
    Marjit, Sugata
    Seidel, Andre
    Thum, Marcel
    [J]. GERMAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 18 (03) : 283 - 301
  • [4] Corruption and firm tax evasion
    Alm, James
    Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge
    McClellan, Chandler
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2016, 124 : 146 - 163
  • [5] CORRUPTION, COMPLEXITY AND TAX EVASION
    Tanzi, Vito
    [J]. EKONOMICHESKAYA POLITIKA, 2018, 13 (06): : 36 - 53
  • [6] TAX EVASION, CORRUPTION AND TAX ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT
    Polo, Orlando Carmelo Castellanos
    Ochoa, Jose Alexander Velasquez
    Sanmartin, Andres Felipe Sanmartin
    Arango, David Alberto Garcia
    [J]. RUSSIAN LAW JOURNAL, 2023, 11 (02) : 44 - 53
  • [7] Tax evasion, tax corruption and stochastic growth
    Celimene, Fred
    Dufrenot, Gilles
    Mophou, Gisele
    N'Guerekata, Gaston
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2016, 52 : 251 - 258
  • [8] TAX EVASION, CORRUPTION AND MARKET ENTRY
    Seidel, Andre
    Thum, Marcel
    [J]. SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 63 (04) : 377 - 398
  • [9] Corruption, tax evasion and social values
    Litina, Anastasia
    Palivos, Theodore
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2016, 124 : 164 - 177
  • [10] Bureaucratic corruption and profit tax evasion
    Goerke L.
    [J]. Economics of Governance, 2008, 9 (2) : 177 - 196