Learning to act: qualitative learning of deterministic action models

被引:4
|
作者
Bolander, Thomas [1 ]
Gierasimczuk, Nina [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Appl Math & Comp Sci, Richard Petersens Plads, Bldg 324, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
Action model learning; dynamic epistemic logic; action types; formal learning theory; computational complexity;
D O I
10.1093/logcom/exx036
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In this article we study learnability of fully observable, universally applicable action models of dynamic epistemic logic. We introduce a framework for actions seen as sets of transitions between propositional states and we relate them to their dynamic epistemic logic representations as action models. We introduce and discuss a wide range of properties of actions and action models and relate them via correspondence results. We check two basic learnability criteria for action models: finite identifiability (conclusively inferring the appropriate action model in finite time) and identifiability in the limit (inconclusive convergence to the right action model). We show that deterministic actions are finitely identifiable, while arbitrary (non-deterministic) actions require more learning power-they are identifiable in the limit. We then move on to a particular learning method, i.e. learning via update, which proceeds via restriction of a space of events within a learning-specific action model. We show how this method can be adapted to learn conditional and unconditional deterministic action models. We propose update learning mechanisms for the afore mentioned classes of actions and analyse their computational complexity. Finally, we study a parametrized learning method which makes use of the upper bound on the number of propositions relevant for a given learning scenario. We conclude with describing related work and numerous directions of further work.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 365
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Incremental Learning of Relational Action Models in Noisy Environments
    Rodrigues, Christophe
    Gerard, Pierre
    Rouveirol, Celine
    INDUCTIVE LOGIC PROGRAMMING, ILP 2010, 2011, 6489 : 206 - 213
  • [42] Lifted action models learning from partial traces
    Lamanna, Leonardo
    Serafini, Luciano
    Saetti, Alessandro
    Gerevini, Alfonso Emilio
    Traverso, Paolo
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2025, 339
  • [43] Learning Temporal Action Models via Constraint Programming
    Garrido, Antonio
    Jimenez, Sergio
    ECAI 2020: 24TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 325 : 2362 - 2369
  • [44] LEARNING DETERMINISTIC CAUSAL RELATIONS
    Feng, Dingcheng
    Chen, Feng
    Xu, Wenli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS, 2013, 22 (03)
  • [45] Learning action models for the improved execution of navigation plans
    Belker, T
    Beetz, M
    Cremers, AB
    ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2002, 38 (3-4) : 137 - 148
  • [46] Action learning and critical thinking: a synthesis of two models
    Soffe, Stephen M.
    Marquardt, Michael J.
    Hale, Enoch
    ACTION LEARNING, 2011, 8 (03): : 211 - 230
  • [47] Coupled Learning of Action Parameters and Forward Models for Manipulation
    Hoefer, Sebastian
    Brock, Oliver
    2016 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS 2016), 2016, : 3893 - 3899
  • [48] Learning complex action models with quantifiers and logical implications
    Zhuo, Hankz Hankui
    Yang, Qiang
    Hu, Derek Hao
    Li, Lei
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2010, 174 (18) : 1540 - 1569
  • [49] Learning to see and act
    Bernhard Schölkopf
    Nature, 2015, 518 : 486 - 487
  • [50] Learning to act on objects
    Natale, L
    Rao, S
    Sandini, G
    BIOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED COMPUTER VISION, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 2525 : 567 - 575