Learning to act: qualitative learning of deterministic action models

被引:4
|
作者
Bolander, Thomas [1 ]
Gierasimczuk, Nina [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Appl Math & Comp Sci, Richard Petersens Plads, Bldg 324, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
Action model learning; dynamic epistemic logic; action types; formal learning theory; computational complexity;
D O I
10.1093/logcom/exx036
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In this article we study learnability of fully observable, universally applicable action models of dynamic epistemic logic. We introduce a framework for actions seen as sets of transitions between propositional states and we relate them to their dynamic epistemic logic representations as action models. We introduce and discuss a wide range of properties of actions and action models and relate them via correspondence results. We check two basic learnability criteria for action models: finite identifiability (conclusively inferring the appropriate action model in finite time) and identifiability in the limit (inconclusive convergence to the right action model). We show that deterministic actions are finitely identifiable, while arbitrary (non-deterministic) actions require more learning power-they are identifiable in the limit. We then move on to a particular learning method, i.e. learning via update, which proceeds via restriction of a space of events within a learning-specific action model. We show how this method can be adapted to learn conditional and unconditional deterministic action models. We propose update learning mechanisms for the afore mentioned classes of actions and analyse their computational complexity. Finally, we study a parametrized learning method which makes use of the upper bound on the number of propositions relevant for a given learning scenario. We conclude with describing related work and numerous directions of further work.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 365
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Learning qualitative models from numerical data
    Zabkar, Jure
    Mozina, Martin
    Bratko, Ivan
    Demsar, Janez
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 175 (9-10) : 1604 - 1619
  • [22] A REINFORCEMENT LEARNING MODEL USING DETERMINISTIC STATE-ACTION SEQUENCES
    Murata, Makoto
    Ozawa, Seiichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2010, 6 (02): : 577 - 590
  • [23] The Act of learning
    Gervais, Colette
    REVUE DES SCIENCES DE L EDUCATION, 2008, 34 (01): : 223 - 224
  • [24] Learning Safe Action Models with Partial Observability
    Le, Hai S.
    Juba, Brendan
    Stern, Roni
    THIRTY-EIGHTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 38 NO 18, 2024, : 20159 - 20167
  • [25] Multi Agent Learning of Relational Action Models
    Rodrigues, Christophe
    Soldano, Henry
    Bourgne, Gauvain
    Rouveirol, Celine
    21ST EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ECAI 2014), 2014, 263 : 1087 - +
  • [26] Learning STRIPS Action Models with Classical Planning
    Aineto, Diego
    Jimenez, Sergio
    Onaindia, Eva
    TWENTY-EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATED PLANNING AND SCHEDULING (ICAPS 2018), 2018, : 399 - 407
  • [27] A Comprehensive Framework for Learning Declarative Action Models
    Aineto D.
    Jiménez S.
    Onaindia E.
    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2022, 74 : 1091 - 1123
  • [28] Bayesian Learning Models of Pain: A Call to Action
    Tabor, Abby
    Burr, Christopher
    CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2019, 26 : 54 - 61
  • [29] Online Learning of Action Models for PDDL Planning
    Lamanna, Leonardo
    Saetti, Alessandro
    Serafini, Luciano
    Gerevini, Alfonso E.
    Traverso, Paolo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTIETH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, IJCAI 2021, 2021, : 4112 - 4118
  • [30] A Comprehensive Framework for Learning Declarative Action Models
    Aineto, Diego
    Jimenez, Sergio
    Onaindia, Eva
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2022, 74 : 1091 - 1123