Learning to act: qualitative learning of deterministic action models

被引:4
|
作者
Bolander, Thomas [1 ]
Gierasimczuk, Nina [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Appl Math & Comp Sci, Richard Petersens Plads, Bldg 324, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
Action model learning; dynamic epistemic logic; action types; formal learning theory; computational complexity;
D O I
10.1093/logcom/exx036
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In this article we study learnability of fully observable, universally applicable action models of dynamic epistemic logic. We introduce a framework for actions seen as sets of transitions between propositional states and we relate them to their dynamic epistemic logic representations as action models. We introduce and discuss a wide range of properties of actions and action models and relate them via correspondence results. We check two basic learnability criteria for action models: finite identifiability (conclusively inferring the appropriate action model in finite time) and identifiability in the limit (inconclusive convergence to the right action model). We show that deterministic actions are finitely identifiable, while arbitrary (non-deterministic) actions require more learning power-they are identifiable in the limit. We then move on to a particular learning method, i.e. learning via update, which proceeds via restriction of a space of events within a learning-specific action model. We show how this method can be adapted to learn conditional and unconditional deterministic action models. We propose update learning mechanisms for the afore mentioned classes of actions and analyse their computational complexity. Finally, we study a parametrized learning method which makes use of the upper bound on the number of propositions relevant for a given learning scenario. We conclude with describing related work and numerous directions of further work.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 365
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Learning Partially Observable Deterministic Action Models
    Amir, Eyal
    19TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI-05), 2005, : 1433 - 1439
  • [2] Learning Partially Observable Deterministic Action Models
    Amir, Eyal
    Chang, Allen
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2008, 33 : 349 - 402
  • [3] Learning partially observable deterministic action models
    Amir, Eyal
    Chang, Allen
    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2008, 33 : 349 - 402
  • [4] Learning partially observable non-deterministic action models
    Rao, Dong-Ning
    Jiang, Zhi-Hua
    Jiang, Yun-Fei
    Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software, 2014, 25 (01): : 51 - 63
  • [5] Learning linguistic constructions grounded in qualitative action models
    Panzner, Maximilian
    Gaspers, Judith
    Cimiano, Philipp
    2015 24TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (RO-MAN), 2015, : 121 - 127
  • [6] Instance-Based Online Learning of Deterministic Relational Action Models
    Xu, Joseph Z.
    Laird, John E.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FOURTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AAAI-10), 2010, : 1574 - 1579
  • [7] Learning qualitative models
    Bratko, I
    Suc, D
    AI MAGAZINE, 2003, 24 (04) : 107 - 119
  • [8] Learning qualitative metabolic models
    Coghill, GM
    Garrett, SM
    King, RD
    ECAI 2004: 16TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 110 : 445 - 449
  • [9] Stochastic versus deterministic features in learning models
    Stamatescu, IO
    ALTERNATIVE LOGICS: DO SCIENCES NEED THEM?, 2004, : 205 - 213
  • [10] To act and learn: a Bakhtinian exploration of action learning
    Gold, Jeff
    Anderson, Lisa
    Clarke, Jean
    Thorpe, Richard
    ACTION LEARNING, 2009, 6 (02): : 121 - 130