Transvalvular Flow Rate Determines Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis

被引:66
|
作者
Namasivayam, Mayooran [1 ]
He, Wei [1 ]
Churchill, Timothy W. [1 ]
Capoulade, Romain [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Shiying [1 ]
Lee, Hang [1 ]
Danik, Jacqueline S. [1 ]
Picard, Michael H. [1 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [3 ]
Levine, Robert A. [1 ]
Hung, Judy [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Nantes, CHU Nantes, CNRS, INSERM,Inst Thorax, F-44000 Nantes, France
[3] Laval Univ, Quebec Heart & Lung Inst, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
aortic stenosis; flow rate; low flow; low gradient; outcome; prognosis; SYSTOLIC-TIME INTERVALS; EXERCISE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.046
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Aortic valve area (AVA) <= 1.0 cm(2) is a defining characteristic of severe aortic stenosis (AS). AVA can be underestimated at low transvalvular flow rate. Yet, the impact of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) is unknown and is not incorporated into AS assessment. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the effect of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA in AS. METHODS In total, 1,131 patients with moderate or severe AS and complete clinical follow-up were included as part of a longitudinal database. The effect of flow rate (ratio of stroke volume to ejection time) on prognostic value of AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) for time to death was evaluated, adjusting for confounders. Sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff for prognostic threshold of AVA. The findings were validated in a separate external longitudinal cohort of 939 patients. RESULTS Flow rate had a significant effect on prognostic value of AVA. AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) was not prognostic for mortality (p = 0.15) if AVA was measured at flow rates below median (<= 242 ml/s). In contrast, AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) was highly prognostic for mortality (p = 0.003) if AVA was measured at flow rates above median (>242 ml/s). Findings were irrespective of multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and surgical/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (as time-dependent covariates); comorbidities; medications; and echocardiographic features. AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) was also not an independent predictor of mortality below median flow rate in the validation cohort. The optimal flow rate cutoff for prognostic threshold was 210 ml/s. CONCLUSIONS Transvalvular flow rate determines prognostic value of AVA in AS. AVA measured at low flow rate is not a good prognostic marker and therefore not a good diagnostic marker for truly severe AS. Flow rate assessment should be incorporated into clinical diagnosis, classification, and prognosis of AS. (C) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1758 / 1769
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Resting Aortic Valve Area at Normal Transaortic Flow Rate Reflects True Valve Area in Suspected Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Chahal, Navtej S.
    Drakopoulou, Maria
    Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ana M.
    Manivarmane, Ramasamy
    Khattar, Rajdeep
    Senior, Roxy
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2015, 8 (10) : 1133 - 1139
  • [32] OUTCOMES OF AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN AORTIC STENOSIS WITH IMPAIRED LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION: HAS THE TRANSVALVULAR GRADIENT A DETERMINANT VALUE IN THESE RESULTS?
    Bakkali, A.
    Lyazidi, S.
    Sayah, R.
    Houssa, M. Ait
    Laaroussi, M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 5 (03): : 592 - 598
  • [33] Transvalvular Flow, Sex, and Survival After Valve Replacement Surgery in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Guzzetti, Ezequiel
    Poulin, Anthony
    Annabi, Mohamed-Salah
    Zhang, Bin
    Kalavrouziotis, Dimitri
    Couture, Christian
    Dagenais, Francois
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (16) : 1897 - 1909
  • [34] Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Calcification in Asymptomatic Patients With NonSevere Aortic Valve Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Ye, Zi
    Foley, Thomas A.
    Gajjar, Rohan
    Sarano, Maurice E. Enriquez
    Michelena, Hector I.
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [35] Prognostic Value of Improved Kidney Function After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis
    Nijenhuis, Vincent Johan
    Peper, Joyce
    Vorselaars, Veronique M. M.
    Swaans, Martin J.
    De Kroon, Thom
    Van der Heyden, Jan A. S.
    Rensing, Benno J. W. M.
    Heijmen, Robin
    Bos, Willem-Jan W.
    ten Berg, Jurrien M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 121 (10): : 1239 - 1245
  • [36] Role of transvalvular gradient in outcome from valve replacement for aortic stenosis
    Weerasinghe, A
    Yusuf, M
    Athanasiou, T
    Wood, A
    Magee, P
    Uppal, R
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 77 (04): : 1266 - 1271
  • [37] Incremental prognostic value of electrocardiographic strain after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis
    Heger, J.
    Marchandot, B.
    Kibler, M.
    Peillex, M.
    Trimaille, A.
    Carmona, A.
    Matsushita, K.
    Trinh, A.
    Reydel, A.
    Zeyons, F.
    Petit-Eisenmann, H.
    Jesel, L.
    Ohlmann, P.
    Morel, O.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 4081 - 4081
  • [38] Prognostic Value of Renal Function in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Treated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Meneguz-Moreno, Rafael A.
    Ramos, Auristela Io
    Siqueira, Dimytri
    de Castro-Filho, Antonio
    Jatene, Tannas
    Jeronimo, Andreia Dias
    Le Bihan, David
    Moreira, Adriana
    Arrais, Magaly
    Abizaid, Alexandre
    Sousa, Amanda
    Sousa, J. Eduardo
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 89 (03) : 452 - 459
  • [40] Prognostic Implications of Small Aortic Root in Aortic Valve Stenosis
    Bahlmann, Edda
    Cramariuc, Dana
    Minners, Jan
    Lonnebakken, Mai Tone
    Ray, Simon
    Gohlke-Baerwolf, Christa
    Nienaber, Christoph A.
    Jander, Nikolaus
    Chambers, John B.
    Kuck, Karl Heinz
    Gerdts, Eva
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 130