Transvalvular Flow Rate Determines Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis

被引:66
|
作者
Namasivayam, Mayooran [1 ]
He, Wei [1 ]
Churchill, Timothy W. [1 ]
Capoulade, Romain [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Shiying [1 ]
Lee, Hang [1 ]
Danik, Jacqueline S. [1 ]
Picard, Michael H. [1 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [3 ]
Levine, Robert A. [1 ]
Hung, Judy [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Nantes, CHU Nantes, CNRS, INSERM,Inst Thorax, F-44000 Nantes, France
[3] Laval Univ, Quebec Heart & Lung Inst, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
aortic stenosis; flow rate; low flow; low gradient; outcome; prognosis; SYSTOLIC-TIME INTERVALS; EXERCISE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.046
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Aortic valve area (AVA) <= 1.0 cm(2) is a defining characteristic of severe aortic stenosis (AS). AVA can be underestimated at low transvalvular flow rate. Yet, the impact of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) is unknown and is not incorporated into AS assessment. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the effect of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA in AS. METHODS In total, 1,131 patients with moderate or severe AS and complete clinical follow-up were included as part of a longitudinal database. The effect of flow rate (ratio of stroke volume to ejection time) on prognostic value of AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) for time to death was evaluated, adjusting for confounders. Sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff for prognostic threshold of AVA. The findings were validated in a separate external longitudinal cohort of 939 patients. RESULTS Flow rate had a significant effect on prognostic value of AVA. AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) was not prognostic for mortality (p = 0.15) if AVA was measured at flow rates below median (<= 242 ml/s). In contrast, AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) was highly prognostic for mortality (p = 0.003) if AVA was measured at flow rates above median (>242 ml/s). Findings were irrespective of multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and surgical/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (as time-dependent covariates); comorbidities; medications; and echocardiographic features. AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) was also not an independent predictor of mortality below median flow rate in the validation cohort. The optimal flow rate cutoff for prognostic threshold was 210 ml/s. CONCLUSIONS Transvalvular flow rate determines prognostic value of AVA in AS. AVA measured at low flow rate is not a good prognostic marker and therefore not a good diagnostic marker for truly severe AS. Flow rate assessment should be incorporated into clinical diagnosis, classification, and prognosis of AS. (C) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1758 / 1769
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic value of projected aortic valve area in patients with paradoxical low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis: Japanese Multicenter Aortic Stenosis (JUST) Study
    Izumo, M.
    Takeuchi, M.
    Seo, Y.
    Yamashita, E.
    Suzuki, K.
    Ishizu, T.
    Sato, K.
    Aonuma, K.
    Otsuji, Y.
    Akashi, Y. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 372 - 372
  • [22] Low Transvalvular Flow Rate, Not Low Stroke Volume Index, Predicts Mortality in Patients With Low-Gradient, Low-Valve Area Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Aortic Valve Intervention
    Vamvakidou, Anastasia
    Jin, Wenying
    Danylenko, Oleksandr
    Chahal, Navtej
    Papsozomenos, George
    Whiteside, David
    Banfield, Ann
    West, Catherine
    Khattar, Rajdeep
    Senior, Roxy
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [23] Results of aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with relatively low transvalvular pressure gradients
    Blitz, LR
    Gorman, M
    Herrmann, HC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 81 (03): : 358 - 362
  • [24] Goes valve morphology affect flow dependence of aortic valve area in valvular aortic stenosis?
    Burwash, IG
    Hay, KM
    Chan, KL
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 786 - 786
  • [25] Prognostic Value of Energy Loss Coefficient for Predicting Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis Outcomes: Direct Comparison With Aortic Valve Area
    Yoshida, Hirokazu
    Seo, Yoshihiro
    Ishizu, Tomoko
    Izumo, Masaki
    Akashi, Yoshihiro J.
    Yamashita, Eiji
    Otsuji, Yutaka
    Negishi, Kazuaki
    Takeuchi, Masaaki
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2019, 32 (03) : 351 - +
  • [26] Prognostic Value of Hemodynamic Parameters in Asymptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis
    Mathieu, Tiffany
    Nguyen, Virginia
    Cimadevilla, Claire
    Melissopoulou, Maria
    Arangalage, Dimitri
    Codogno, Isabelle
    Duval, Xavier
    Huart, Virginie
    Vahanian, Alec
    Messika-Zeitoun, David
    CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 134 (02) : 223 - 223
  • [27] The prognostic value of fQRSTa in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement
    Erturk, Mehmet
    Avci, Yalcin
    Agus, Hicaz Zencirkiran
    Guner, Ahmet
    Demir, Ali Riza
    Tasbulak, Omer
    Aslan, Serkan
    Yildirim, Ceren
    Can, Cemil
    Oz, Kursad
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (10) : 2627 - 2632
  • [28] Atrial fibrillation in severe aortic stenosis: Prognostic value and results of aortic valve replacement
    Kubala, Maciej
    Bohbot, Yohann
    Rusinaru, Dan
    Marechaux, Sylvestre
    Diouf, Momar
    Tribouilloy, Christophe
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 166 (03): : 771 - 779
  • [29] Flow dependence of valve area in aortic stenosis: Relation to valve morphology
    Shively, BK
    Charlton, GA
    Crawford, MH
    Chaney, RK
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (03) : 654 - 660
  • [30] Assessment of Aortic Stenosis Beyond the Aortic Valve Area
    Ito, Saki
    Miranda, William R.
    Oh, Jae K.
    STRUCTURAL HEART-THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM, 2019, 3 (04): : 268 - 279