An empirical analysis of risk in conventional and organic arable farming in The Netherlands

被引:8
|
作者
Berentsen, P. B. M. [1 ]
van Asseldonk, M. A. P. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Business Econ Grp, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Agr Econ Res Inst, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Arable farming; Organic farming; Risk assessment; Error component implicit detrending method; YIELD; CROP; CONVERSION; ATTITUDES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2016.06.002
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This paper assesses and compares risk in conventional and organic arable farming in The Netherlands with respect to family farm income and underlying price and production variables. To investigate the risk factors the farm accountancy data network was used containing unbalanced panel data from 196 conventional and 29 organic representative Dutch arable farms (for the period 2002 up to and including 2011). Variables with regard to price and production risk were identified using a family farm income analysis scheme. Price risk variables are input and output prices, while yield volatility of different crops is the main production risk variable. To assess risk, an error components implicit detrending method was applied and the resulting detrended standard deviations were compared between conventional and organic farms. Results indicate that the risk at the level of family farm income is higher in organic farming. The underlying variables show higher risk for organic farms in crop yields, crop prices and variable input costs per crop. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 106
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Responses of birds to organic arable farming: Mechanisms and evidence
    Fuller, RJ
    [J]. 1997 BRIGHTON CROP PROTECTION CONFERENCE - WEEDS, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS VOLS 1-3, 1997, : 897 - 906
  • [42] DGGE-fingerprinting of arable soils shows differences in microbial community structure of conventional and organic farming systems
    Kuffner, Melanie
    Pinar, Guadalupe
    Hace, Karin
    Handschur, Michael
    Haslberger, Alexander G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 2 (3-4): : 260 - 268
  • [43] A comparative assessment of the performance of organic and conventional arable farming systems on high-quality soils in Northern Germany
    Taube, F
    Loges, R
    Kelm, M
    Latacz-Lohmann, U
    [J]. BERICHTE UBER LANDWIRTSCHAFT, 2005, 83 (02): : 165 - 176
  • [44] Effect of yield and price risk on conversion from conventional to organic farming
    Acs, Szvetlana
    Berentsen, Paul
    Huirne, Ruud
    van Asseldonk, Marcel
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2009, 53 (03) : 393 - 411
  • [45] Food from conventional or organic farming - a question of sensory analysis?
    Lehmann, Iris
    [J]. ERNAHRUNGS-UMSCHAU, 2007, 54 (11): : 647 - 651
  • [46] Comparative economic analysis of conventional and organic hazelnut farming in Turkey
    Bülbül, M
    Tanrivermis, H
    [J]. BERICHTE UBER LANDWIRTSCHAFT, 2002, 80 (02): : 304 - 320
  • [47] Comparing the Profitability of Organic and Conventional Production in Family Farming: Empirical Evidence From Brazil
    Froehlich, Anderson G.
    Melo, Andrea S. S. A.
    Sampaio, Breno
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 150 : 307 - 314
  • [48] Understanding resilience of farming systems: Insights from system dynamics modelling for an arable farming system in the Netherlands
    Herrera, H.
    Schutz, L.
    Paas, W.
    Reidsma, P.
    Kopainsky, B.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2022, 464
  • [49] Production Risk and Technical Efficiency in Organic and Conventional Agriculture - The Case of Arable Farms in Germany
    Tiedemann, Torben
    Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 64 (01) : 73 - 96
  • [50] A comparison of energy use in conventional and integrated arable farming systems in the UK
    Bailey, AP
    Basford, WD
    Penlington, N
    Park, JR
    Keatinge, JDH
    Rehman, T
    Tranter, RB
    Yates, CM
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 97 (1-3) : 241 - 253