An empirical analysis of risk in conventional and organic arable farming in The Netherlands

被引:8
|
作者
Berentsen, P. B. M. [1 ]
van Asseldonk, M. A. P. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Business Econ Grp, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Agr Econ Res Inst, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Arable farming; Organic farming; Risk assessment; Error component implicit detrending method; YIELD; CROP; CONVERSION; ATTITUDES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2016.06.002
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This paper assesses and compares risk in conventional and organic arable farming in The Netherlands with respect to family farm income and underlying price and production variables. To investigate the risk factors the farm accountancy data network was used containing unbalanced panel data from 196 conventional and 29 organic representative Dutch arable farms (for the period 2002 up to and including 2011). Variables with regard to price and production risk were identified using a family farm income analysis scheme. Price risk variables are input and output prices, while yield volatility of different crops is the main production risk variable. To assess risk, an error components implicit detrending method was applied and the resulting detrended standard deviations were compared between conventional and organic farms. Results indicate that the risk at the level of family farm income is higher in organic farming. The underlying variables show higher risk for organic farms in crop yields, crop prices and variable input costs per crop. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 106
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in organic and conventional farming systems in the Netherlands
    Bos, Jules F. F. P.
    de Haan, Janjo
    Sukkel, Wijnand
    Schils, Rene L. M.
    [J]. NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2014, 68 : 61 - 70
  • [22] The future of farming: The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach
    Sandhu, Harpinder S.
    Wratten, Stephen D.
    Cullen, Ross
    Case, Brad
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 64 (04) : 835 - 848
  • [23] Long-term impacts of organic and conventional farming on the soil microbiome in boreal arable soil
    Peltoniemi, Krista
    Velmala, Sannakajsa
    Fritze, Hannu
    Lemola, Riitta
    Pennanen, Taina
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY, 2021, 104
  • [24] Organic versus conventional arable farming systems: Functional grouping helps understand staphylinid response
    Clough, Yann
    Kruess, Andreas
    Tscharntke, Teja
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 118 (1-4) : 285 - 290
  • [25] THE SIGNIFICANCE OF VA-MYCORRHIZA TO FUTURE ARABLE FARMING IN THE NETHERLANDS
    LIMONARD, T
    RUISSEN, MA
    [J]. NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 1989, 95 : 129 - 135
  • [26] Impact changes of climatic extremes on arable farming in the north of the Netherlands
    Ben F. Schaap
    Margaretha Blom-Zandstra
    Christiane M. L. Hermans
    Bastiaan G. Meerburg
    Jan Verhagen
    [J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2011, 11 : 731 - 741
  • [27] Impact changes of climatic extremes on arable farming in the north of the Netherlands
    Schaap, Ben F.
    Blom-Zandstra, Margaretha
    Hermans, Christiane M. L.
    Meerburg, Bastiaan G.
    Verhagen, Jan
    [J]. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2011, 11 (03) : 731 - 741
  • [28] Introduction of earthworms into an organic arable farming system
    van der Werff, PA
    Noordhuis, R
    Dekkers, TBM
    [J]. APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 1998, 9 (1-3) : 311 - 317
  • [29] Comparative Cost Analysis of Organic and Conventional Farming in Hungary
    Urfi, Peter
    Koch, Krisztina Kormosne
    Hoffmann, Andras
    Sardi, Katalin
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2013, 44 (1-4) : 703 - 710
  • [30] The Comparative Cost and Profit Analysis of Organic and Conventional Farming
    Urfi, Peter
    Hoffmann, Andras
    Koch, Kormosne Krisztina
    [J]. STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 113 (01): : 67 - 84