Personality and leader effectiveness: A moderated mediation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy

被引:215
|
作者
Ng, Kok-Yee [1 ]
Ang, Soon
Chan, Kim-Yin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Business Sch, Div Strategy Management & Org, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore Armed Forces, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Div Strategy Management & Org, Singapore 639798, Singapore
关键词
self-efficacy; personality; job demands; job autonomy; moderated mediation;
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.733
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The trait theory of leadership is advanced by a joint investigation of the mediating role of (a) leadership self-efficacy (LSE = leader's perceived capabilities to perform leader roles) in linking neuroticism, extraversion, and conscientiousness with leader effectiveness and (b) the moderating role of job demands and job autonomy in influencing the mediation. Using K. J. Preacher, D. D. Rucker, and A. F. Hayes' (2007) moderated mediation framework, the authors tested the model (over a 2-year period) with matched data from 394 military leaders and their supervisors. Results showed that LSE mediated the relationships for neuroticism, extraversion, and conscientiousness with leader effectiveness. Moderated mediation analyses further revealed that LSE mediated the relationships for (a) all 3 personality variables for only those leaders with low job demands; (b) neuroticism and conscientiousness for only those leaders with high job autonomy; and (c) extraversion, regardless of a leader's level of job autonomy, Results underscore the importance of accounting for leaders' situational contexts when examining the relationships between personality, LSE, and effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 743
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Academic Self-Efficacy and Postgraduate Procrastination: A Moderated Mediation Model
    Liu, Guoqing
    Cheng, Gang
    Hu, Juan
    Pan, Yun
    Zhao, Shouying
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [32] Job demands and coping behaviour:: the moderating role of professional self-efficacy
    Salanova, M
    Grau, RM
    Martínez, IM
    [J]. PSICOTHEMA, 2005, 17 (03) : 390 - 395
  • [33] Exploring the Role of Shared Leadership on Job Performance in IT Industries: Testing the Moderated Mediation Model
    Wang, Yu
    Jin, Xiu
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [34] Sense of calling, job crafting, spiritual leadership and work meaningfulness: a moderated mediation model
    Chang, Po-Chien
    Gao, Xiaoxiao
    Wu, Ting
    [J]. LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 42 (05) : 690 - 704
  • [35] Workplace ostracism and turnover intention: A moderated mediation model of job insecurity and coaching leadership
    Zhang, Rui
    Niu, Xiongying
    Zhang, Baofang
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L ADMINISTRATION, 2024, 41 (01): : 109 - 122
  • [36] DO JOB AUTONOMY AND NEGOTIATION SELF-EFFICACY IMPROVE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIPS?
    Oeij, Peter R. A.
    [J]. SA JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 32 (02) : 74 - 79
  • [37] Contribution of Personality, Job Strain, and Occupational Self-Efficacy to Job Satisfaction in Different Occupational Contexts
    Maggiori, Christian
    Johnston, Claire S.
    Rossier, Jerome
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 43 (03) : 244 - 259
  • [38] Green leadership and pro-environmental behaviour: a moderated mediation model with rewards, self-efficacy and training
    Ahuja, Jaya
    Yadav, Mohit
    Sergio, Rommel D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS AND SYSTEMS, 2023, 39 (02) : 481 - 501
  • [39] Supervisor-subordinate fit need for autonomy and subordinate job crafting: a moderated mediation model
    Dutta, Koushikee
    Fuller, Bryan
    Bajaba, Saleh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023,
  • [40] The roles of OCB and automation in the relationship between job autonomy and organizational performance: a moderated mediation model
    Park, Rhokeun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 29 (06): : 1139 - 1156