CSAR Scoring Challenge Reveals the Need for New Concepts in Estimating Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity

被引:21
|
作者
Novikov, Fedor N. [1 ]
Zeifman, Alexey A. [2 ]
Stroganov, Oleg V. [1 ,2 ]
Stroylov, Viktor S. [1 ]
Kulkov, Val [3 ]
Chilov, Ghermes G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] MolTech Ltd, Moscow 119992, Russia
[2] ND Zelinskii Inst Organ Chem, Moscow 119991, Russia
[3] BioMolTech Corp, Toronto, ON M2L 1L1, Canada
关键词
PDBBIND DATABASE; COMPLEXES; DOCKING;
D O I
10.1021/ci200034y
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The dG prediction accuracy by the Lead Finder docking software on the CSAR test set was characterized by R-2=0.62 and rmsd=1.93 kcal/mol, and the method of preparation of the full-atom structures of the test set did not significantly affect the resulting accuracy of predictions. The primary factors determining the correlation between the predicted and experimental values were the van der Waals interactions and solvation effects. Those two factors alone accounted for R-2=0.50. The other factors that affected the accuracy of predictions, listed in the order of decreasing importance, were the change of ligand's internal energy upon binding with protein, the electrostatic interactions, and the hydrogen bonds. It appears that those latter factors contributed to the independence of the prediction results from the method of full-atom structure preparation. Then, we turned our attention to the other factors that could potentially improve the scoring function in order to raise the accuracy of the dG prediction. It turned out that the ligand-centric factors, including Mw, cLogP, PSA, etc. or protein-centric factors, such as the functional class of protein, did not improve the prediction accuracy. Following that, we explored if the weak molecular interactions such as X-H center dot center dot center dot Ar, X-H center dot center dot center dot Hal, CO center dot center dot center dot Hal, C-H center dot center dot center dot X, stacking and pi-cationic interactions (where X is N or O), that are generally of interest to the medicinal chemists despite their lack of proper molecular mechanical parametrization, could improve dG prediction. Our analysis revealed that out of these new interactions only CO...Hal is statistically significant for dG predictions using Lead Finder scoring function. Accounting for the CO...Hal interaction resulted in the reduction of the rmsd from 2.19 to 0.69 kcal/mol for the corresponding structures. The other weak interaction factors were not statistically significant and therefore irrelevant to the accuracy of dG prediction. On the basis of our findings from our participation in the CSAR scoring challenge we conclude that a significant increase of accuracy predictions necessitates breakthrough scoring approaches. We anticipate that the explicit accounting for water molecules, protein flexibility, and a more thermodynamically accurate method of dG calculation rather than single point energy calculation may lead to such breakthroughs.
引用
收藏
页码:2090 / 2096
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction based on profiles of intermolecular contacts
    Wang, Debby D.
    Chan, Moon-Tong
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 20 : 1088 - 1096
  • [42] Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity via deep learning models
    Wang, Huiwen
    [J]. BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2024, 25 (02)
  • [43] DeepDTAF: a deep learning method to predict protein-ligand binding affinity
    Wang, Kaili
    Zhou, Renyi
    Li, Yaohang
    Li, Min
    [J]. BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2021, 22 (05)
  • [44] Ensemble of local and global information for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction
    Li, Gaili
    Yuan, Yongna
    Zhang, Ruisheng
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2023, 107
  • [45] Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction with edge awareness and supervised attention
    Gu, Yuliang
    Zhang, Xiangzhou
    Xu, Anqi
    Chen, Weiqi
    Liu, Kang
    Wu, Lijuan
    Mo, Shenglong
    Hu, Yong
    Liu, Mei
    Luo, Qichao
    [J]. ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (01)
  • [46] Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction exploiting sequence constituent homology
    Abdel-Rehim, Abbi
    Orhobor, Oghenejokpeme
    Hang, Lou
    Ni, Hao
    King, Ross D.
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 39 (08)
  • [47] Energetic and entropic factors determining binding affinity in protein-ligand complexes
    Klebe, G
    Bohm, HJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RECEPTOR AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION RESEARCH, 1997, 17 (1-3): : 459 - 473
  • [48] Factors altering the affinity of protein-ligand binding in an external electrostatic field
    Kuo, Shyh-Ming
    Yang, Pei-Kun
    [J]. BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY, 2015, 104 : 17 - 25
  • [49] A Cascade Graph Convolutional Network for Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity
    Shen, Huimin
    Zhang, Youzhi
    Zheng, Chunhou
    Wang, Bing
    Chen, Peng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2021, 22 (08)
  • [50] Energetic and entropic factors determining binding affinity in protein-ligand complexes
    Klebe, G
    Böhm, HJ
    [J]. PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM, 1998, 100 : 77 - 83