CSAR Scoring Challenge Reveals the Need for New Concepts in Estimating Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity

被引:21
|
作者
Novikov, Fedor N. [1 ]
Zeifman, Alexey A. [2 ]
Stroganov, Oleg V. [1 ,2 ]
Stroylov, Viktor S. [1 ]
Kulkov, Val [3 ]
Chilov, Ghermes G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] MolTech Ltd, Moscow 119992, Russia
[2] ND Zelinskii Inst Organ Chem, Moscow 119991, Russia
[3] BioMolTech Corp, Toronto, ON M2L 1L1, Canada
关键词
PDBBIND DATABASE; COMPLEXES; DOCKING;
D O I
10.1021/ci200034y
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The dG prediction accuracy by the Lead Finder docking software on the CSAR test set was characterized by R-2=0.62 and rmsd=1.93 kcal/mol, and the method of preparation of the full-atom structures of the test set did not significantly affect the resulting accuracy of predictions. The primary factors determining the correlation between the predicted and experimental values were the van der Waals interactions and solvation effects. Those two factors alone accounted for R-2=0.50. The other factors that affected the accuracy of predictions, listed in the order of decreasing importance, were the change of ligand's internal energy upon binding with protein, the electrostatic interactions, and the hydrogen bonds. It appears that those latter factors contributed to the independence of the prediction results from the method of full-atom structure preparation. Then, we turned our attention to the other factors that could potentially improve the scoring function in order to raise the accuracy of the dG prediction. It turned out that the ligand-centric factors, including Mw, cLogP, PSA, etc. or protein-centric factors, such as the functional class of protein, did not improve the prediction accuracy. Following that, we explored if the weak molecular interactions such as X-H center dot center dot center dot Ar, X-H center dot center dot center dot Hal, CO center dot center dot center dot Hal, C-H center dot center dot center dot X, stacking and pi-cationic interactions (where X is N or O), that are generally of interest to the medicinal chemists despite their lack of proper molecular mechanical parametrization, could improve dG prediction. Our analysis revealed that out of these new interactions only CO...Hal is statistically significant for dG predictions using Lead Finder scoring function. Accounting for the CO...Hal interaction resulted in the reduction of the rmsd from 2.19 to 0.69 kcal/mol for the corresponding structures. The other weak interaction factors were not statistically significant and therefore irrelevant to the accuracy of dG prediction. On the basis of our findings from our participation in the CSAR scoring challenge we conclude that a significant increase of accuracy predictions necessitates breakthrough scoring approaches. We anticipate that the explicit accounting for water molecules, protein flexibility, and a more thermodynamically accurate method of dG calculation rather than single point energy calculation may lead to such breakthroughs.
引用
收藏
页码:2090 / 2096
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Wscore: integration of active site water structure into an empirical scoring function for calculating protein-ligand binding affinity
    Friesner, Richard
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 250
  • [32] A Comparative Assessment of Predictive Accuracies of Conventional and Machine Learning Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction
    Ashtawy, Hossam M.
    Mahapatra, Nihar R.
    [J]. IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 12 (02) : 335 - 347
  • [33] Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using Structure-based Deep Learning: A Review
    Meli, Rocco
    Morris, Garrett M.
    Biggin, Philip C.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 2
  • [34] Information Theory-Based Scoring Function for the Structure-Based Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity
    Kulharia, Mahesh
    Goody, Rooer S.
    Jackson, Richard N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2008, 48 (10) : 1990 - 1998
  • [35] A NEW MEASURE OF COOPERATIVITY IN PROTEIN-LIGAND BINDING
    BRIGGS, WE
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1983, 18 (01) : 67 - 71
  • [36] A new concept for multidimensional selection of ligand conformations (MultiSelect) and multidimensional scoring (MultiScore) of protein-ligand binding affinities
    Terp, GE
    Johansen, BN
    Christensen, IT
    Jorgensen, FS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 44 (14) : 2333 - 2343
  • [37] Development of an empirical scoring function for calculating protein-ligand binding affinities
    Friesner, Richard A.
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 243
  • [38] ANYL 104-Estimating protein-ligand binding affinity using high-throughput screening by NMR
    Shortridge, Matthew D.
    Mercier, Kelly A.
    Hage, David S.
    Harbison, Gerard S.
    Powers, Robert
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 235
  • [39] Surface-based multimodal protein-ligand binding affinity prediction
    Xu, Shiyu
    Shen, Lian
    Zhang, Menglong
    Jiang, Changzhi
    Zhang, Xinyi
    Xu, Yanni
    Liu, Juan
    Liu, Xiangrong
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2024, 40 (07)
  • [40] Deep Learning in Drug Design: Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction
    Rezaei, Mohammad A.
    Li, Yanjun
    Wu, Dapeng
    Li, Xiaolin
    Li, Chenglong
    [J]. IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 19 (01) : 407 - 417