CSAR Scoring Challenge Reveals the Need for New Concepts in Estimating Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity

被引:21
|
作者
Novikov, Fedor N. [1 ]
Zeifman, Alexey A. [2 ]
Stroganov, Oleg V. [1 ,2 ]
Stroylov, Viktor S. [1 ]
Kulkov, Val [3 ]
Chilov, Ghermes G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] MolTech Ltd, Moscow 119992, Russia
[2] ND Zelinskii Inst Organ Chem, Moscow 119991, Russia
[3] BioMolTech Corp, Toronto, ON M2L 1L1, Canada
关键词
PDBBIND DATABASE; COMPLEXES; DOCKING;
D O I
10.1021/ci200034y
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The dG prediction accuracy by the Lead Finder docking software on the CSAR test set was characterized by R-2=0.62 and rmsd=1.93 kcal/mol, and the method of preparation of the full-atom structures of the test set did not significantly affect the resulting accuracy of predictions. The primary factors determining the correlation between the predicted and experimental values were the van der Waals interactions and solvation effects. Those two factors alone accounted for R-2=0.50. The other factors that affected the accuracy of predictions, listed in the order of decreasing importance, were the change of ligand's internal energy upon binding with protein, the electrostatic interactions, and the hydrogen bonds. It appears that those latter factors contributed to the independence of the prediction results from the method of full-atom structure preparation. Then, we turned our attention to the other factors that could potentially improve the scoring function in order to raise the accuracy of the dG prediction. It turned out that the ligand-centric factors, including Mw, cLogP, PSA, etc. or protein-centric factors, such as the functional class of protein, did not improve the prediction accuracy. Following that, we explored if the weak molecular interactions such as X-H center dot center dot center dot Ar, X-H center dot center dot center dot Hal, CO center dot center dot center dot Hal, C-H center dot center dot center dot X, stacking and pi-cationic interactions (where X is N or O), that are generally of interest to the medicinal chemists despite their lack of proper molecular mechanical parametrization, could improve dG prediction. Our analysis revealed that out of these new interactions only CO...Hal is statistically significant for dG predictions using Lead Finder scoring function. Accounting for the CO...Hal interaction resulted in the reduction of the rmsd from 2.19 to 0.69 kcal/mol for the corresponding structures. The other weak interaction factors were not statistically significant and therefore irrelevant to the accuracy of dG prediction. On the basis of our findings from our participation in the CSAR scoring challenge we conclude that a significant increase of accuracy predictions necessitates breakthrough scoring approaches. We anticipate that the explicit accounting for water molecules, protein flexibility, and a more thermodynamically accurate method of dG calculation rather than single point energy calculation may lead to such breakthroughs.
引用
收藏
页码:2090 / 2096
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SCORE: A new empirical method for estimating the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex
    Wang, RX
    Liu, L
    Lai, LH
    Tang, YQ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING, 1998, 4 (12) : 379 - 394
  • [2] SCORE: A New Empirical Method for Estimating the Binding Affinity of a Protein-Ligand Complex
    Renxiao Wang
    Liang Liu
    Luhua Lai
    Youqi Tang
    [J]. Molecular modeling annual, 1998, 4 : 379 - 394
  • [3] Improving the scoring of protein-ligand binding affinity by including the desolvation energy
    Li, Yan
    Wang, Renxiao
    Holloway, M.
    Gao, Ying-Duo
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [4] Information theory based scoring function for predicting protein-ligand binding affinity
    Mahesh Kulharia
    [J]. Chemistry Central Journal, 2 (Suppl 1)
  • [5] Graphlet signature-based scoring method to estimate protein-ligand binding affinity
    Singh, Omkar
    Sawariya, Kunal
    Aparoy, Polamarasetty
    [J]. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2014, 1 (04):
  • [6] Origin of high affinity protein-ligand binding
    Sharp, Kim A.
    Harpole, Kyle
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 244
  • [7] Predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with gnina
    Francoeur, Paul
    Koes, David
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [8] SFCscore: Scoring functions for affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes
    Sotriffer, Christoph A.
    Sanschagrin, Paul
    Matter, Hans
    Klebe, Gerhard
    [J]. PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 73 (02) : 395 - 419
  • [9] Solvated Interaction Energy (SIE) for Scoring Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities. 2. Benchmark in the CSAR-2010 Scoring Exercise
    Sulea, Traian
    Cui, Qizhi
    Purisima, Enrico O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2011, 51 (09) : 2066 - 2081
  • [10] Empirical Scoring Functions for Affinity Prediction of Protein-ligand Complexes
    Pason, Lukas P.
    Sotriffer, Christoph A.
    [J]. MOLECULAR INFORMATICS, 2016, 35 (11-12) : 541 - 548