The influence of expansion rates on mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A computational analysis

被引:46
|
作者
Boccaccio, A.
Pappalettere, C.
Kelly, D. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Trinity Ctr Bioengn, Sch Engn, Dublin 2, Ireland
[2] Politecn Bari, Dipartimento Ingn Meccan & Gest, I-70126 Bari, Italy
关键词
mechanobiology; mandibular distraction osteogenesis; osteotomized human mandible; tissue differentiation; finite element analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s10439-007-9367-x
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Mandibular distraction osteogenesis is a clinical procedure used for modifying the mandibular geometry when problems of dental overcrowding and arch shrinkage occur. The objective of this study is to use a computational model of tissue differentiation to examine the influence of the rate of distraction on bone re-growth within the fracture callus of a human mandible submitted to symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. A 3D model of the mandible is reconstructed from CT scan data and meshed into finite elements. Two different mastication loadings have been investigated: a 'full' mastication load and a 'reduced' mastication load where the action of each muscle was reduced by 70%. Four different distraction rates were analyzed: 0.6, 1.2, 2, and 3 mm/day, allowing a total displacement of 6 mm. In the early stages of the distraction process it is predicted that there is a decrease in the amount of bone tissue forming within the center of the fracture gap for all distraction rates. After the initial phases of expansion, the bone tissue within the callus increases for the slower rate of distraction or continues to decrease at the faster rates of distraction. At the end of the simulated maturation period, 47% of the distracted callus was predicted to consist of bone tissue for a distraction rate of 0.6 mm/day, decreasing to 22% for a distraction rate of 3 mm/day. Significantly higher amounts of bone formation were predicted for all distraction rates for the case of reduced mastication loading. Disparities between the model predictions and what is observed in vivo were found. For instance, during the latency period, the distraction period and beyond, the model is predicting larger than expected amounts of cartilage tissue formation within the callus. This and other limitations of the proposed model are discussed and possible specific explanations for these disparities are provided in the paper. The model predicts a distraction rate of around 1.2 mm/day to be optimal as higher rates produce less bone tissue while the risk of a premature bone union is greater at slower rates of distraction because in the latter stages of the distraction process bone tissue is predicted to form between the left and right side of the bone callus.
引用
收藏
页码:1940 / 1960
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomechanical Analysis of the Effect of Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Aykan, Andac
    Ozturk, Serdar
    Sahin, Ismail
    Gurses, Senih
    Ural, Ali Ugur
    Oren, Nisa Cem
    Isik, Selcuk
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (02) : E169 - E175
  • [42] Analysis of the performance of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis
    Boccaccio, A.
    Cozzani, M.
    Pappalettere, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 33 (02) : 113 - 120
  • [43] DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF MANDIBULAR SYMPHYSEAL DEFECTS
    ANNINO, DJ
    GOGUEN, LA
    KARMODY, CS
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1994, 120 (09) : 911 - 916
  • [44] Pediatric mandibular distraction osteogenesis: The present and the future
    Rhee, ST
    Buchman, SR
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 14 (05) : 803 - 808
  • [45] Endoscopically assisted intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Hierl, T
    Hemprich, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 30 (04) : 339 - 341
  • [46] Outcomes Analysis of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis for the Treatment of Pierre Robin Sequence
    Murage, Kariuki P.
    Tholpady, Sunil S.
    Friel, Michael
    Havlik, Robert J.
    Flores, Roberto L.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (02) : 419 - 421
  • [47] Microscopic evaluation of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis
    Duran, I
    Malkoc, S
    Iseri, H
    Tunali, M
    Tosun, M
    Küçükkolbasi, H
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2006, 76 (03) : 369 - 374
  • [48] Proximal segment displacement in mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Padwa, BL
    Zaragoza, SM
    Sonis, AL
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 13 (02) : 293 - 296
  • [49] Predictors of Failure in Infant Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A.
    Fahradyan, Artur
    Brady, Colin
    Tsuha, Michaela
    Azadgoli, Beina
    Ward, Sally
    Urata, Mark M.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 76 (09) : 1955 - 1965
  • [50] Sequential histomorphometric analysis of regenerate osteogenesis following mandibular distraction in the rat
    Williams, BE
    King, GJ
    Liu, ZJ
    Rafferty, KL
    ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (05) : 497 - 506