The influence of expansion rates on mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A computational analysis

被引:46
|
作者
Boccaccio, A.
Pappalettere, C.
Kelly, D. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Trinity Ctr Bioengn, Sch Engn, Dublin 2, Ireland
[2] Politecn Bari, Dipartimento Ingn Meccan & Gest, I-70126 Bari, Italy
关键词
mechanobiology; mandibular distraction osteogenesis; osteotomized human mandible; tissue differentiation; finite element analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s10439-007-9367-x
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Mandibular distraction osteogenesis is a clinical procedure used for modifying the mandibular geometry when problems of dental overcrowding and arch shrinkage occur. The objective of this study is to use a computational model of tissue differentiation to examine the influence of the rate of distraction on bone re-growth within the fracture callus of a human mandible submitted to symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. A 3D model of the mandible is reconstructed from CT scan data and meshed into finite elements. Two different mastication loadings have been investigated: a 'full' mastication load and a 'reduced' mastication load where the action of each muscle was reduced by 70%. Four different distraction rates were analyzed: 0.6, 1.2, 2, and 3 mm/day, allowing a total displacement of 6 mm. In the early stages of the distraction process it is predicted that there is a decrease in the amount of bone tissue forming within the center of the fracture gap for all distraction rates. After the initial phases of expansion, the bone tissue within the callus increases for the slower rate of distraction or continues to decrease at the faster rates of distraction. At the end of the simulated maturation period, 47% of the distracted callus was predicted to consist of bone tissue for a distraction rate of 0.6 mm/day, decreasing to 22% for a distraction rate of 3 mm/day. Significantly higher amounts of bone formation were predicted for all distraction rates for the case of reduced mastication loading. Disparities between the model predictions and what is observed in vivo were found. For instance, during the latency period, the distraction period and beyond, the model is predicting larger than expected amounts of cartilage tissue formation within the callus. This and other limitations of the proposed model are discussed and possible specific explanations for these disparities are provided in the paper. The model predicts a distraction rate of around 1.2 mm/day to be optimal as higher rates produce less bone tissue while the risk of a premature bone union is greater at slower rates of distraction because in the latter stages of the distraction process bone tissue is predicted to form between the left and right side of the bone callus.
引用
收藏
页码:1940 / 1960
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mandibular distraction osteogenesis to treat OSAS
    Gritti, Bruno B. A.
    XVII CONGRESSO NAZIONALE DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA CHIRURGIA MAXILLO-FACCIALE (SICMF), 2011, : 137 - 142
  • [32] A mouse model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Fang, TD
    Nacamuli, RP
    Song, HM
    Thomas, R
    Fong, KD
    Aalami, OO
    Longaker, MT
    CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 10, 2003, : 397 - 398
  • [33] Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the pediatric patient
    Tibesar, Robert J.
    Sidman, James D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2008, 16 (06): : 548 - 554
  • [34] Mandibular overgrowth after distraction osteogenesis
    Rahman, M. M.
    Stewart, D. A.
    Gianoutsos, M. P.
    CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY: PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, : 335 - 337
  • [35] Mandibular widening by intraoral distraction osteogenesis
    Guerrero, CA
    Bell, WH
    Contasti, GI
    Rodriguez, AM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 35 (06): : 383 - 392
  • [36] Influence of distraction osteogenesis in mandibular hypoplasia on the facial development in the growing age
    Klein, C
    CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 10, 2003, : 151 - 153
  • [37] Fractal analysis of regeneration in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rats.
    Connors, N. A.
    Liu, Z. J.
    Bollen, A. -M.
    King, G. J.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B164 - B164
  • [38] Stress Distribution on the Mandibular Condyle and the Distraction Area in Distraction Osteogenesis by Finite Element Analysis
    Li, Peng
    Long, Jie
    Tang, Wei
    Li, Jia
    Liang, Rui
    Tian, Dong Wei
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (03) : 1031 - 1037
  • [39] Denervation During Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Results in Impaired Osteogenesis
    Tevlin, Ruth
    Januszyk, Michael
    Griffin, Michelle
    Salhotra, Ankit
    Wan, Derrick C.
    Chan, Charles K. F.
    Longaker, Michael T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 233 (05) : S196 - S197
  • [40] Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects by distraction osteogenesis for mandibular reconstruction
    Kuriakose, MA
    Shnayder, Y
    DeLacure, MD
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2003, 25 (10): : 816 - 824