Relation of Operator Volume and Access Site to Short-Term Mortality in Radial Versus Femoral Access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Hannan, Edward L. [1 ]
Zhong, Ye [1 ]
Ling, Frederick S. K. [2 ]
LeMay, Michel [3 ]
Jacobs, Alice K. [4 ]
King, Spencer B., III [5 ]
Berger, Peter B.
Venditti, Ferdinand J. [6 ]
Walford, Gary [7 ]
Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline [8 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[3] Univ Ottawa, Heart Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Boston Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[5] Emory Hlth Syst, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Albany Med Ctr, Albany, NY USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Med Ctr, XXX, New York, NY USA
[8] Mt Sinai St Lukes Hosp, New York, NY USA
来源
关键词
ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ARTERY ACCESS; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; ANGIOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; PREDICT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.04.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The relation between operator volume and mortality of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) procedures for ST-elevation myocardial infarction has not been studied comprehensively. This study included patients who underwent PPCI between 2010 and 2017 in all nonfederal hospitals approved to perform PCI in New York State. We compared risk-adjusted in-hospital/30-day mortality for radial access (RA) and femoral access (FA) and the relation between risk-adjusted mortality and procedure volume for each access site. In 44,540 patients in the study period, the use of RA rose from 8% in 2,010% to 43% in 2017 (p <0.0001). There was no significant change in PPCI risk-adjusted mortality during the period (p=0.27 for trend). RA was associated with lower mortality when imposing operator exclusion criteria used in recent trials. There was a significant operator inverse volume-mortality relation for FA procedures but not for RA procedures. FA procedures performed by lower volume FA operators (lowest quartile) were associated with higher risk-adjusted mortality compared with RA procedures (3.71% vs 3.06%, p = 0.01) or compared with FA procedures performed by higher volume FA operators (3.71% vs 3.16% , p = 0.01). In conclusion, in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction referred for primary PCI in New York State, there was a significant uptake in the use of RA along with relatively constant in-hospital/30-day mortality. There was a significant inverse operator volume-mortality relation for FA procedures accompanied by higher mortality for FA procedures performed by low volume FA operators than for all other primary PCI procedures. In conclusion, this information underscores the need for operators to remain vigilant in maintaining FA skills and monitoring FA outcomes. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Balanced Adoption of Radial Artery Access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Anderson, H. Vernon
    Faxon, David P.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 2 (10) : 1059 - 1060
  • [32] Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography
    Calabro, Paolo
    Golia, Enrica
    Crisci, Mario
    ANGIOLOGY, 2018, 69 (04) : 286 - 287
  • [33] Association between operator volume and mortality in primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Krishnamurthy, Arvindra
    Keeble, Claire M.
    Anderson, Michelle
    Burton-Wood, Natalie
    Somers, Kathryn
    Harland, Charlotte
    Baxter, Paul D.
    McLenachan, Jim M.
    Blaxill, Jonathan M.
    Blackman, Daniel J.
    Malkin, Christopher J.
    Wheatcroft, Stephen B.
    Greenwood, John P.
    OPEN HEART, 2022, 9 (02):
  • [34] Radial versus femoral access site for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients suffering acute myocardial infarctionA randomized prospective multicenter trial
    Christiana Schernthaner
    Matthias Hammerer
    Stefan Harb
    Matthias Heigert
    Kurt Hoellinger
    Elisabeth Lassnig
    Edwin Maurer
    Jochen Schuler
    Peter Siostrzonek
    Hanno Ulmer
    Andreas Winter
    Johann Altenberger
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2018, 130 : 182 - 189
  • [35] Radial versus femoral access site for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients suffering acute myocardial infarction A randomized prospective multicenter trial
    Schernthaner, Christiana
    Hammerer, Matthias
    Harb, Stefan
    Heigert, Matthias
    Hoellinger, Kurt
    Lassnig, Elisabeth
    Maurer, Edwin
    Schuler, Jochen
    Siostrzonek, Peter
    Ulmer, Hanno
    Winter, Andreas
    Altenberger, Johann
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2018, 130 (5-6) : 182 - 189
  • [36] Comparison of radial access versus femoral access with the use of vascular closure device for the prevention of vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention
    Teblick, A.
    Vanderbruggen, W.
    Vandendriessche, T.
    Bosmans, J.
    Haine, S.
    Miljoen, H.
    Segers, V.
    Vrints, C.
    Claeys, M. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 1269 - 1269
  • [37] Analysis of safety outcomes for radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention from a large clinical registry
    Dobies, David R.
    Barber, Kimberly R.
    Cohoon, Amanda L.
    OPEN HEART, 2016, 3 (02):
  • [38] Radial versus femoral access for rescue percutaneous coronary intervention with adjuvant glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use
    Kassam, S
    Cantor, WJ
    Patel, D
    Gilchrist, IC
    Winegard, LD
    Rea, ME
    Bowman, KA
    Chisholm, RJ
    Strauss, BH
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 20 (14) : 1439 - 1442
  • [39] COMPARING THE SAFETY & EFFICACY OF RADIAL VERSUS FEMORAL ARTERIAL ACCESS IN CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
    Tudor, Lloyd
    Mozid, Abdul
    HEART, 2022, 108 : A47 - A48
  • [40] RADIAL VS. FEMORAL ACCESS IN PATIENTS REFERRED FOR PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION: CHARACTERISTICS AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES
    Mansour, S.
    Bertrand, M. J.
    Stevens, L. M.
    Noiseux, N.
    Kokis, A.
    Masson, J. B.
    Gobeil, F.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 27 (05) : S326 - S326