Relation of Operator Volume and Access Site to Short-Term Mortality in Radial Versus Femoral Access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Hannan, Edward L. [1 ]
Zhong, Ye [1 ]
Ling, Frederick S. K. [2 ]
LeMay, Michel [3 ]
Jacobs, Alice K. [4 ]
King, Spencer B., III [5 ]
Berger, Peter B.
Venditti, Ferdinand J. [6 ]
Walford, Gary [7 ]
Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline [8 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[3] Univ Ottawa, Heart Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Boston Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[5] Emory Hlth Syst, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Albany Med Ctr, Albany, NY USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Med Ctr, XXX, New York, NY USA
[8] Mt Sinai St Lukes Hosp, New York, NY USA
来源
关键词
ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ARTERY ACCESS; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; ANGIOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; PREDICT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.04.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The relation between operator volume and mortality of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) procedures for ST-elevation myocardial infarction has not been studied comprehensively. This study included patients who underwent PPCI between 2010 and 2017 in all nonfederal hospitals approved to perform PCI in New York State. We compared risk-adjusted in-hospital/30-day mortality for radial access (RA) and femoral access (FA) and the relation between risk-adjusted mortality and procedure volume for each access site. In 44,540 patients in the study period, the use of RA rose from 8% in 2,010% to 43% in 2017 (p <0.0001). There was no significant change in PPCI risk-adjusted mortality during the period (p=0.27 for trend). RA was associated with lower mortality when imposing operator exclusion criteria used in recent trials. There was a significant operator inverse volume-mortality relation for FA procedures but not for RA procedures. FA procedures performed by lower volume FA operators (lowest quartile) were associated with higher risk-adjusted mortality compared with RA procedures (3.71% vs 3.06%, p = 0.01) or compared with FA procedures performed by higher volume FA operators (3.71% vs 3.16% , p = 0.01). In conclusion, in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction referred for primary PCI in New York State, there was a significant uptake in the use of RA along with relatively constant in-hospital/30-day mortality. There was a significant inverse operator volume-mortality relation for FA procedures accompanied by higher mortality for FA procedures performed by low volume FA operators than for all other primary PCI procedures. In conclusion, this information underscores the need for operators to remain vigilant in maintaining FA skills and monitoring FA outcomes. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Radial vs Femoral Access in Primary Percutaneous Intervention in STEMI Patients
    Ng, Y. P.
    Yap, S. H.
    Nazrul, M.
    Kumara, G.
    Shahzeb, M.
    Imran, M.
    Rahal, M. Y.
    Mahathar, A. W.
    Alzamani, M.
    Intan, S.
    Omar, A. F.
    Rosli, M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 249 : S39 - S40
  • [22] Procedural Volume and Outcomes With Radial or Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention
    Jolly, Sanjit S.
    Cairns, John
    Yusuf, Salim
    Niemela, Kari
    Steg, Philippe Gabriel
    Worthley, Matthew
    Ferrari, Emile
    Cantor, Warren J.
    Fung, Anthony
    Valettas, Nicholas
    Rokoss, Michael
    Olivecrona, Goran K.
    Widimsky, Petr
    Cheema, Asim N.
    Gao, Peggy
    Mehta, Shamir R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (10) : 954 - 963
  • [23] Reasons for Not Using Radial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Era of Experienced Radial Operator
    Mumtaz, Tayebah
    Riangwiwat, Tanawan
    Blankenship, James
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (13) : B775 - B775
  • [24] Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention)
    Pandie, Shaheen
    Mehta, Shamir R.
    Cantor, Warren J.
    Cheema, Asim N.
    Gao, Peggy
    Madan, Mina
    Niemela, Kari
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Schwalm, Jon David
    Valentin, Vicent
    Velianou, James L.
    Jolly, Sanjit S.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (04) : 505 - 512
  • [25] Comment: Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention
    Deora, Surender
    Choudhary, Rahul
    Kaushik, Atul
    INDIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 73 (04) : 525 - 526
  • [26] RADIAL ACCESS FOR PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION - DOES ACCESS SITE CHOICE TRANSLATE INTO CLINICAL BENEFIT?
    Rajani, Nikil K.
    Brown, Adam J.
    McCormick, Liam M.
    Parwaiz, Hammad
    Hoole, Stephen P.
    West, Nick
    HEART, 2014, 100 : A44 - A45
  • [27] Comparison of Radial Access, Guided Femoral Access, and Non-Guided Femoral Access Among Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Koshy, Linda M.
    Aberle, Laura H.
    Krucoff, Mitchell W.
    Hess, Connie N.
    Mazzaferri, Ernest, Jr.
    Jolly, Sanjit S.
    Jacobs, Alice
    Gibson, C. Michael
    Mehran, Roxana
    Gilchrist, Ian C.
    Rao, Sunil V.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 30 (01): : 18 - 22
  • [28] Radial-to-femoral access crossover is not associated with adverse outcomes in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Azzalini, Lorenzo
    Khan, Razi
    Al-Hawwas, Malek
    Hatem, Raja
    Fortier, Annik
    L'Allier, Philippe L.
    Ly, Hung Q.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (11) : B246 - B246
  • [29] Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Crossover From Radial to Femoral Access During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Sahinkus, Salih
    Aksoy, Muhammet Necati Murat
    Aydin, Ercan
    ANGIOLOGY, 2020, 71 (09) : 847 - 852
  • [30] In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy radial access is safer and as efficient as femoral access
    Kubler, Piotr
    Zimoch, Wojciech
    Kosowski, Michal
    Tomasiewicz, Brunon
    Telichowski, Artur
    Reczuch, Krzysztof
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 31 (04) : 471 - 477