Relation of Operator Volume and Access Site to Short-Term Mortality in Radial Versus Femoral Access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Hannan, Edward L. [1 ]
Zhong, Ye [1 ]
Ling, Frederick S. K. [2 ]
LeMay, Michel [3 ]
Jacobs, Alice K. [4 ]
King, Spencer B., III [5 ]
Berger, Peter B.
Venditti, Ferdinand J. [6 ]
Walford, Gary [7 ]
Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline [8 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[3] Univ Ottawa, Heart Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Boston Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[5] Emory Hlth Syst, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Albany Med Ctr, Albany, NY USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Med Ctr, XXX, New York, NY USA
[8] Mt Sinai St Lukes Hosp, New York, NY USA
来源
关键词
ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ARTERY ACCESS; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; ANGIOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; PREDICT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.04.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The relation between operator volume and mortality of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) procedures for ST-elevation myocardial infarction has not been studied comprehensively. This study included patients who underwent PPCI between 2010 and 2017 in all nonfederal hospitals approved to perform PCI in New York State. We compared risk-adjusted in-hospital/30-day mortality for radial access (RA) and femoral access (FA) and the relation between risk-adjusted mortality and procedure volume for each access site. In 44,540 patients in the study period, the use of RA rose from 8% in 2,010% to 43% in 2017 (p <0.0001). There was no significant change in PPCI risk-adjusted mortality during the period (p=0.27 for trend). RA was associated with lower mortality when imposing operator exclusion criteria used in recent trials. There was a significant operator inverse volume-mortality relation for FA procedures but not for RA procedures. FA procedures performed by lower volume FA operators (lowest quartile) were associated with higher risk-adjusted mortality compared with RA procedures (3.71% vs 3.06%, p = 0.01) or compared with FA procedures performed by higher volume FA operators (3.71% vs 3.16% , p = 0.01). In conclusion, in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction referred for primary PCI in New York State, there was a significant uptake in the use of RA along with relatively constant in-hospital/30-day mortality. There was a significant inverse operator volume-mortality relation for FA procedures accompanied by higher mortality for FA procedures performed by low volume FA operators than for all other primary PCI procedures. In conclusion, this information underscores the need for operators to remain vigilant in maintaining FA skills and monitoring FA outcomes. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Association Between Radial Versus Femoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Long-Term Mortality
    Ng, Andrew Kei-Yan
    Ng, Pauline Yeung
    Ip, April
    Jim, Man-Hong
    Siu, Chung-Wah
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2021, 10 (15):
  • [2] Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: is there a preferred route to the heart?
    Meier, Pascal
    Windecker, Stephan
    Lansky, Alexandra J.
    HEART, 2012, 98 (04) : 269 - 270
  • [3] Radial versus femoral arterial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention
    Cruden, N. L. M.
    Khan, A.
    Bloomfield, P.
    Newby, D. E.
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 51 (04) : 44 - 44
  • [4] Radial versus Femoral Access for Octogenarians Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Koifman, Edward
    Steinvil, Arie
    Rogers, Toby
    Buchanan, Kyle
    Alraies, Chadi
    Torguson, Rebecca
    Gai, Jiaxiang
    Bernardo, Nelson
    Ben-Dor, Itsik
    Gallino, Robert
    Lager, Robert
    Pichard, Augusto
    Suddath, William
    Satler, Lowell
    Waksman, Ron
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (03) : S36 - S36
  • [5] Radial Versus Femoral Access in Primary Percutaneous Intervention in STEMI Patients
    Ng, Yau Piow
    Yap, Swee Hien
    Ali, Rosli Mohd
    Omar, Al Fazir
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (16) : S15 - S16
  • [6] Radial versus femoral access in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and rotational atherectomy
    Januszek, Rafal
    Siudak, Zbigniew
    Malinowski, Krzysztof P.
    Reczuch, Krzysztof
    Dobrzycki, Slawomir
    Lesiak, Maciej
    Hawranek, Michal
    Gil, Robert J.
    Witkowski, Adam
    Wojakowski, Wojciech
    Lekston, Andrzej
    Gasior, Mariusz
    Wanha, Wojciech
    Dudek, Dariusz
    Bartus, Stanislaw
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2020, 78 (06) : 529 - 536
  • [7] Radial Versus Femoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications for Vascular Complications and Bleeding
    Nathan, Sandeep
    Rao, Sunil V.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 14 (04) : 502 - 509
  • [8] Radial Versus Femoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications for Vascular Complications and Bleeding
    Sandeep Nathan
    Sunil V. Rao
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2012, 14 : 502 - 509
  • [9] Radial or femoral access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): Does the choice matters?
    Batra, Mahesh Kumar
    Rai, Lajpat
    Khan, Naveed Ullah
    Mengal, Muhammad Naeem
    Khowaja, Sanam
    Rizvi, Syed Nadeem Hassan
    Saghir, Tahir
    Qamar, Nadeem
    Sial, Jawaid Akbar
    Karim, Musa
    INDIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 72 (03) : 166 - 171
  • [10] Radial versus Femoral Access in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Matched_Pairs Analysis in an Asian Cohort
    Agahari, Fransisca
    Lee, Chi-Hang
    Xia, Hong Yan
    Tan, Huay-Cheem
    Yeo, Tiong Cheng
    Teo, Swee-Guan
    Low, Adrian
    Chan, Mark
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)