Trust and Consumer Preferences for Pig Production Attributes in Canada

被引:14
|
作者
Muringai, Violet [1 ]
Goddard, Ellen [1 ]
Bruce, Heather [2 ]
Plastow, Graham [3 ]
Ma, Lifen [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, 515 Gen Serv Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, 3-18E Agr Forestry Ctr, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, 1416 Coll Plaza, Edmonton, AB T6G 2C8, Canada
[4] Alberta Publ Serv Commiss, 7th Floor Peace Hills Trust Tower,10011-109 St, Edmonton, AB T5J 3S8, Canada
关键词
WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; LATENT-CLASS MODEL; MIXED LOGIT; FOOD; QUALITY; PORK; PERCEPTIONS; SAFETY; BEEF; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1111/cjag.12138
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Consumers' trust in general and specifically in food system agents may reduce uncertainties when they make choices among credence attributes such as production methods. In this study, we assess the linkages between consumers' trust (generalized and institutional trust) and their preferences for traditionally raised pork. Data were collected through an online survey including a stated preference experiment in Canada in 2011. Results suggest that both low and high trusting consumers are willing to pay significant premiums for traditionally raised pork over conventional pork. Willingness to pay values are higher for the high trust group as compared to the low trust group. Respondents with higher levels of trust rated traditionally raised pork more positively (in comparison to conventional pork) in terms of taste, freshness, safety, healthiness, and not containing hormones and antibiotics as compared to those respondents who have lower levels of trust. Government certification of traditionally raised pork is important for both consumers with low and high trust. The fact that high trust respondents were more in favor of this production credence attribute suggests that providing it in the market may require additional efforts to convince more of the lower trust individuals that this attribute is worth additional expenditure.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 514
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploring consumer preferences for hedonic and utilitarian food attributes
    Maehle, Natalia
    Iversen, Nina
    Hem, Leif
    Otnes, Cele
    [J]. BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2015, 117 (12): : 3039 - 3063
  • [22] Willingness to pay and preferences for healthy home attributes in Canada
    Spetic, W
    Kozak, R
    Cohen, D
    [J]. FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2005, 55 (10) : 19 - 24
  • [23] ON THE CONJOINT ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER'S PREFERENCES ON QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF RICE
    Agbas, Nikka S.
    Ceballos, Roel F.
    [J]. ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS IN STATISTICS, 2019, 58 (01) : 45 - 55
  • [24] Analysis of the consumer preferences of attributes of Rajini Modest Fashion Products
    Jannah, Irfianti Nur
    Kodrat, David Sukardi
    [J]. 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP (7TH ICOEN), 2021, : 93 - 103
  • [25] The Heterogeneity of Consumer Preferences for Meat Safety Attributes in Traditional Markets
    Nugraha, Widya Satya
    Yang, Shang-Ho
    Ujiie, Kiyokazu
    [J]. FOODS, 2021, 10 (03)
  • [26] Consumer preferences for GM food and other attributes of the food system
    James, S
    Burton, M
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 47 (04) : 501 - 518
  • [27] Public priorities and consumer preferences for selected attributes of automated vehicles
    Paulina Lustgarten
    Scott Le Vine
    [J]. Railway Engineering Science, 2018, 26 (01) : 72 - 79
  • [28] Public priorities and consumer preferences for selected attributes of automated vehicles
    Lustgarten, Paulina
    Le Vine, Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN TRANSPORTATION, 2018, 26 (01): : 72 - 79
  • [29] Consumer preferences for oyster trait attributes in China: A choice experiment
    Yuan, Bin
    Cui, Yuhu
    Liu, Wei
    Sheng, Wenqian
    Xu, Hanxiao
    Yang, Lin
    [J]. AQUACULTURE, 2023, 571
  • [30] Can blockchain technology strengthen consumer preferences for credence attributes?
    Caterina Contini
    Fabio Boncinelli
    Giovanna Piracci
    Gabriele Scozzafava
    Leonardo Casini
    [J]. Agricultural and Food Economics, 11