Seed treatment and N rate do not impact dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plant growth or grain yield in Ontario

被引:2
|
作者
Boersma, Stephen J. [1 ]
Gillard, Chris L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Plant Agr, Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada
关键词
dry bean; seed treatment; nitrogen rate; root rot; FUNGICIDES; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1139/cjps-2020-0116
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Application of nitrogen fertilizer and commercial seed treatments are two strategies dry bean growers in Ontario utilize to manage root rot and maximize yields. However, data solidifying these practices is absent or outdated. Experiments were conducted at the Huron Research Station, near Exeter, Ontario, from 2008 to 2010, to measure plant growth and yield responses for navy, kidney, and cranberry dry bean market classes (cv. T9905, Pink Panther, and Etna, respectively) to seed treatment (NST, no seed treatment; CMBD, Cruiser Maxx Bean + Dynasty) and N fertilizer rates of 0, 35, 70, 105, 140, and 175 kg N.ha(-1). Plant measurements taken included plant emergence, vigour, height and maturity, plant and seed mass, and grain moisture and yield. Over three years, plant growth and yield responses to seed treatment and nitrogen fertilizer were very scarce. Plant emergence and vigour either improved or were not affected by seed treatment or N rate, while increasing N rates increased plant height of only Pink Panther in 2008. Plant mass was unaffected by either factor while seed treatment decreased days to maturity and grain moisture of T9905 in 2008. Nitrogen fertilizer improved the grain yield of Etna, with the highest yields occurring with 70 kg N.ha(-1) or more, while other cultivar site-years did not respond. Overall, these results demonstrate dry beans rarely respond to N fertilizer or seed treatment at the Huron Research Station. Additional testing over multiple years and locations would assist in predicting these responses.
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 555
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of different nitrogen sources on plant characteristics and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Fernandez-Luqueno, F.
    Reyes-Varela, V.
    Martinez-Suarez, C.
    Salomon-Hernandez, G.
    Yanez-Meneses, J.
    Ceballos-Ramirez, J. M.
    Dendooven, L.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (01) : 396 - 403
  • [32] EFFECT OF SEED AGE ON GERMINATION AND YIELD OF FIELD BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L)
    VIEIRA, C
    TURRIALBA, 1966, 16 (04): : 396 - &
  • [33] Impact of common bacterial blight on the yield, seed weight and seed discoloration of different market classes of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Boersma, J. G.
    Hou, A.
    Gillard, C. L.
    Mcrae, K. B.
    Conner, R. L.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2015, 95 (04) : 703 - 710
  • [34] EFFECT OF SALT STRESS ON THE GROWTH AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS RATE OF BEAN PLANTS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)
    Stoeva, Nevena
    Kaymakanova, Miroslava
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE, 2008, 9 (03): : 385 - 391
  • [35] Effect of sowing date on the growth and seed yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) in highland environments
    AcostaGallegos, JA
    VargasVazquez, P
    White, JW
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1996, 49 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [36] Effect of imazamox plus bentazon on dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Hekmat, Sharareh
    Soltani, Nader
    Shropshire, Christy
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CROP PROTECTION, 2008, 27 (12) : 1491 - 1494
  • [37] Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on growth and seed yield of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)
    Nandan, R
    Prasad, UK
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1998, 43 (03) : 550 - 554
  • [38] Characteristics of flavonol glycosides in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seed coats
    Pitura, Karen
    Arntfield, Susan D.
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2019, 272 : 26 - 32
  • [39] Mapping QTL for seed yield and canning quality following processing of black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Wright, E. M.
    Kelly, J. D.
    EUPHYTICA, 2011, 179 (03) : 471 - 484
  • [40] EFFECT OF SALINITY ON GERMINATION AND SEED PHYSIOLOGY IN BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)
    Kaymakanova, M.
    BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT, 2009, 23 : 326 - 329