Seed treatment and N rate do not impact dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plant growth or grain yield in Ontario

被引:2
|
作者
Boersma, Stephen J. [1 ]
Gillard, Chris L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Plant Agr, Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada
关键词
dry bean; seed treatment; nitrogen rate; root rot; FUNGICIDES; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1139/cjps-2020-0116
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Application of nitrogen fertilizer and commercial seed treatments are two strategies dry bean growers in Ontario utilize to manage root rot and maximize yields. However, data solidifying these practices is absent or outdated. Experiments were conducted at the Huron Research Station, near Exeter, Ontario, from 2008 to 2010, to measure plant growth and yield responses for navy, kidney, and cranberry dry bean market classes (cv. T9905, Pink Panther, and Etna, respectively) to seed treatment (NST, no seed treatment; CMBD, Cruiser Maxx Bean + Dynasty) and N fertilizer rates of 0, 35, 70, 105, 140, and 175 kg N.ha(-1). Plant measurements taken included plant emergence, vigour, height and maturity, plant and seed mass, and grain moisture and yield. Over three years, plant growth and yield responses to seed treatment and nitrogen fertilizer were very scarce. Plant emergence and vigour either improved or were not affected by seed treatment or N rate, while increasing N rates increased plant height of only Pink Panther in 2008. Plant mass was unaffected by either factor while seed treatment decreased days to maturity and grain moisture of T9905 in 2008. Nitrogen fertilizer improved the grain yield of Etna, with the highest yields occurring with 70 kg N.ha(-1) or more, while other cultivar site-years did not respond. Overall, these results demonstrate dry beans rarely respond to N fertilizer or seed treatment at the Huron Research Station. Additional testing over multiple years and locations would assist in predicting these responses.
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 555
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Correlations in Leaf Chlorophyll and Yield Related Traits of Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Gueler, Semiha
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2009, 21 (03) : 1792 - 1796
  • [12] Determination of effective traits for seed yield in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm
    Karimi, Marzieh
    Golparvar, Ahmad Reza
    RESEARCH ON CROPS, 2011, 12 (03) : 789 - 791
  • [13] Path analysis of grain yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and its components
    Silva Cabral, Pablo Diego
    Bastos Soares, Tais Cristina
    Passos Lima, Andreia Barcelos
    Bastos Soares, Yaska Janaina
    da Silva, Josimar Aleixo
    REVISTA CIENCIA AGRONOMICA, 2011, 42 (01): : 132 - 138
  • [14] Response to selection for seed yield and nitrogen (N2) fixation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Barron, JE
    Pasini, RJ
    Davis, DW
    Stuthman, DD
    Graham, PH
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1999, 62 (2-3) : 119 - 128
  • [16] Drum priming in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seed
    Lopes, Higino Marcos
    Bennett, Mark Alan
    Brandao, Antonio de Amorim
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS AGRARIAS-AGRARIA, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [17] Interactions amongst grain variables in various dwarf dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars
    Önder, M
    Babaoglu, M
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ACKER UND PFLANZENBAU, 2001, 187 (01): : 19 - 23
  • [18] EFFECT OF SEED PRE-TREATMENT WITH GROWTH REGULATORS ON SEED YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF COMMON BEANS (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Mohtashami, Mona
    Naderi, Ahmad
    Ghanbari, Ali Akbar
    Alavifazel, Mojtaba
    Lak, Shahram
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF FIELD CROPS, 2016, 21 (02) : 313 - 317
  • [19] Yield stability in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes
    Mekbib, F
    EUPHYTICA, 2003, 130 (02) : 147 - 153
  • [20] Yield stability in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes
    Frew Mekbib
    Euphytica, 2003, 130 : 147 - 153