Organic milk preference: is it a matter of information?

被引:33
|
作者
Scozzafava, Gabriele [1 ]
Gerini, Francesca [1 ]
Boncinelli, Fabio [1 ]
Contini, Caterina [1 ]
Marone, Enrico [1 ]
Casini, Leonardo [1 ]
机构
[1] DAGRI Univ Florence, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry DAGRI, Piazzale Cascine 18, I-50144 Florence, Italy
关键词
WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; ANIMAL-WELFARE; CONSUMERS PREFERENCES; MIXED LOGIT; FOOD; CHOICES; DEMAND; BEHAVIOR; MARKET; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.appet.2019.104477
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study evaluates how textual information treatments (no information, animal welfare, quality, sustainability, and production cost) applied to organic production affect consumer preferences and willingness to pay for organic milk. We performed a choice experiment on 1250 Italian consumers, using a between-subject design. Our results show that without information, consumers on the average do not show a preference for organic milk. The impact of the information provided on the organic milk preference is mixed. Treatments on quality and production costs have no effect on consumer preferences for organic milk. On the contrary, consumers who received information on animal welfare or about environmental sustainability in organic farming showed a greater willingness to pay for organic milk than for conventional milk. Our results are in line with other studies that have observed that providing information about the ethical features of organic farming, such as animal welfare and environmental sustainability, has the greatest positive effect on consumer willingness to pay. These results are important for the possible strategies that stakeholders of the supply chain may enact to promote organic milk consumption.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Positional information and preference aggregation
    Powers, RC
    [J]. SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2005, 24 (03) : 575 - 583
  • [32] EFFECTS OF INFORMATION ON PREFERENCE FOR AN OCCUPATION
    SPOKANE, AR
    HERZOGSPOKANE, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPLOYMENT COUNSELING, 1981, 18 (02) : 64 - 72
  • [33] ON MEASURES OF RELATIVE INFORMATION WITH PREFERENCE
    SINGHAL, LC
    TUTEJA, RK
    JAIN, P
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 1988, 17 (05) : 1449 - 1464
  • [34] The collective preference for shared information
    Wittenbaum, GM
    Park, ES
    [J]. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 10 (02) : 70 - 73
  • [35] Positional information and preference aggregation
    Robert C. Powers
    [J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 2005, 24 : 575 - 583
  • [36] Affect or information? Labeling policy and consumer valuation of rBST free and organic characteristics of milk
    Kolodinsky, Jane
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2008, 33 (06) : 616 - 623
  • [37] Preliminary Analysis of Voluntary Information on Organic Milk Labels in Four European Union Countries
    Wos, Karolina
    Borghoff, Lisa Marie
    Horvat, Andrijana
    Paoletti, Flavio
    Civitelli, Eleonora Saggia
    Rembialkowska, Ewa
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [38] Preference for Information and Dynamic Consistency
    Simon Grant
    Atsushi Kajii
    Ben Polak
    [J]. Theory and Decision, 2000, 48 : 263 - 286
  • [39] Information and preference reversals in lotteries
    Bakir, Niyazi Onur
    Klutke, Georgia-Ann
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 210 (03) : 752 - 756
  • [40] Correction to: ‘Information and preference aggregation’
    Donald E. Campbell
    Jerry S. Kelly
    [J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 2005, 24 : 395 - 396