Comparison of equipment management and cleaning protocols for rigid sigmoidoscopy

被引:2
|
作者
Simpson, Paul J. B. [1 ]
McMurrick, Paul J. [1 ]
Polglase, Adrian L. [1 ]
Koh, Cherry E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Sigmoidoscopy; Proctoscopy; Sterilisation; Enzymatic cleaning; Insufflation bellows; Cleaning protocol;
D O I
10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05279.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To provide outcome data relating to cleaning of rigid sigmoidoscopy equipment comparing commonly used techniques, allowing a framework for general guidelines for use in clinical practice. Methods: A total of 104 rigid sigmoidoscopies were performed in the rooms of two colorectal surgeons using standard techniques. A three-way randomization was performed adopting the following variables: enzymatic washing versus steam sterilization of the light head, disposable versus reusable bellows and use with versus without an air filter. Aerosol from each system was collected on agar plates, and review of colony count numbers was performed. Results: Gross faecal contamination of the rigid sigmoidoscope light head did not occur during any of the procedures. One plate grew a single-gram negative colony; all other contaminated plates showed environmental flora only. Reusable bellows in combination with an air filter showed lower mean colony counts (environmental flora) from the pre-procedure cultures as well as from the bellows' cultures. Conclusion: Enteric flora in this study was rarely aerosolized, and the use of an air filter may decrease this likelihood even further. There is no advantage in using disposable insufflation bellows when compared with the reusable type, allowing considerable cost saving. Washing the light head between procedures with enzymatic solution is a safe cheap and effective method of decontamination.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 731
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] FLEXIBLE VERSUS RIGID SIGMOIDOSCOPY - A COMPARISON USING AN INEXPENSIVE 35-CM FLEXIBLE PROCTOSIGMOIDOSCOPE
    GROBE, JL
    KOZAREK, RA
    SANOWSKI, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1983, 78 (09): : 569 - 571
  • [32] FLEXIBLE VERSUS RIGID SIGMOIDOSCOPY - A COMPARISON USING AN INEXPENSIVE 35CM FLEXIBLE PROCTOSIGMOIDOSCOPE
    GROBE, JL
    KOZAREK, RA
    SANOWSKI, RA
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1982, 28 (02) : 132 - 132
  • [33] Comparison of PES membrane chemical cleaning efficiency using different protocols
    Skorvan, O.
    Holba, M.
    Bodik, I.
    Mikulasek, P.
    EUROMEMBRANE CONFERENCE 2012, 2012, 44 : 1860 - 1863
  • [34] Evaluation of cleaning and disinfection protocols for commercial farm equipment following a foreign animal disease outbreak
    Boe, Timothy
    Calfee, Worth
    Lemieux, Paul
    Serre, Shannon
    Abdel-Hady, Ahmed
    Monge, Mariela
    Aslett, Denise
    Akers, Bruce
    Howard, John
    REMEDIATION-THE JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP COSTS TECHNOLOGIES & TECHNIQUES, 2023, 33 (04): : 379 - 387
  • [35] Cleaning rigid containers
    Chambers, Kerrie
    AORN JOURNAL, 2016, 103 (06) : 645 - 645
  • [36] Vacuum cleaning equipment
    Anon
    Powder and Bulk Engineering, 2002, 16 (07):
  • [37] Equipment for biological cleaning
    Haydu, Juan
    Norman, Mikael
    Metal Finishing, 2002, 100 (10) : 35 - 37
  • [38] Air cleaning equipment
    Anon
    Pollution Equipment News, 2001, 34 (03):
  • [39] EQUIPMENT CLEANING PROCEDURES
    PATTERSON, RS
    SUGAR JOURNAL, 1975, 38 (01): : 28 - 34
  • [40] Cleaning equipment and supplies
    Anon
    Assembly, 2001, 44 (07):