Comparison of equipment management and cleaning protocols for rigid sigmoidoscopy

被引:2
|
作者
Simpson, Paul J. B. [1 ]
McMurrick, Paul J. [1 ]
Polglase, Adrian L. [1 ]
Koh, Cherry E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Sigmoidoscopy; Proctoscopy; Sterilisation; Enzymatic cleaning; Insufflation bellows; Cleaning protocol;
D O I
10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05279.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To provide outcome data relating to cleaning of rigid sigmoidoscopy equipment comparing commonly used techniques, allowing a framework for general guidelines for use in clinical practice. Methods: A total of 104 rigid sigmoidoscopies were performed in the rooms of two colorectal surgeons using standard techniques. A three-way randomization was performed adopting the following variables: enzymatic washing versus steam sterilization of the light head, disposable versus reusable bellows and use with versus without an air filter. Aerosol from each system was collected on agar plates, and review of colony count numbers was performed. Results: Gross faecal contamination of the rigid sigmoidoscope light head did not occur during any of the procedures. One plate grew a single-gram negative colony; all other contaminated plates showed environmental flora only. Reusable bellows in combination with an air filter showed lower mean colony counts (environmental flora) from the pre-procedure cultures as well as from the bellows' cultures. Conclusion: Enteric flora in this study was rarely aerosolized, and the use of an air filter may decrease this likelihood even further. There is no advantage in using disposable insufflation bellows when compared with the reusable type, allowing considerable cost saving. Washing the light head between procedures with enzymatic solution is a safe cheap and effective method of decontamination.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 731
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] COMPARISON OF RIGID AND FLEXIBLE FIBEROPTIC SIGMOIDOSCOPY WITH DOUBLE CONTRAST BARIUM ENEMAS
    VELLACOTT, KD
    AMAR, SS
    HARDCASTLE, JD
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (07) : 399 - 400
  • [12] FLEXIBLE VERSUS RIGID SIGMOIDOSCOPY - A COMPARISON OF FINDINGS AND TOLERANCE IN ASYMPTOMATIC VETERANS
    CHATTERJI, AN
    GOPALSWAMY, N
    TRULZSCH, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1984, 79 (10): : 810 - 810
  • [13] THE EXTENT OF EXAMINATION BY RIGID SIGMOIDOSCOPY
    NICHOLLS, RJ
    DUBE, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (07) : 438 - 438
  • [14] Comparison of rigid vs flexible sigmoidoscopy in detection of significant anorectal lesions
    Rao, VSR
    Ahmad, N
    Al-Mukhtar, A
    Stojkovic, S
    Moore, PJ
    Ahmad, SM
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2005, 7 (01) : 61 - 64
  • [15] Comparison of different cleaning systems for milking equipment
    Wolters, G
    Boerekamp, J
    SYMPOSIUM ON BACTERIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF RAW MILK, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 175 - 176
  • [16] RECTOSCOPY AND SIGMOIDOSCOPY - NEW EQUIPMENT
    PHILLIP, J
    CLASSEN, M
    INTERNIST, 1985, 26 (01): : 6 - 8
  • [17] SHORT COLONOSCOPE - PRELIMINARY-ANALYSIS OF A COMPARISON WITH RIGID SIGMOIDOSCOPY AND HEMOCCULT TESTING
    PROTELL, RL
    BUENGER, N
    GILBERT, DA
    SILVERSTEIN, FE
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1978, 24 (04) : 208 - 208
  • [18] INTRAOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSES: A COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE ENDOSCOPY VERSUS RIGID SIGMOIDOSCOPY
    Paraoan, Marius
    Loganathan, Santosh
    Kumar, Gautam
    Singh, Amital
    GUT, 2021, 70 : A202 - A202
  • [19] The Role of Routine Rigid Sigmoidoscopy in the Colorectal Outpatient Clinic: Does it alter management?
    Hassen, Y.
    Iqbal, Q.
    Prabhudesai, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 : 55 - 55
  • [20] Rigid sigmoidoscopy: An obsolete diagnostic tool?
    Modi, A
    Gokul, K
    Artioukh, DY
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (06) : 974 - 974